Auto-RSS-Content VS Paid Articles

Discussion in 'General Business' started by Proficient, Feb 23, 2009.

0
  1. #1
    Which is better? I'm quite confused atm. lol.
     
    Proficient, Feb 23, 2009 IP
  2. mentos

    mentos Prominent Member

    Messages:
    15,280
    Likes Received:
    473
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    330
    #2
    Vote for paid article coz it is more unique and worth for every single cent spend.
    While rss feed is useless coz it copy the content without modified it and it will make google ban your site due to having duplicated content.
     
    mentos, Feb 23, 2009 IP
  3. cigadung07

    cigadung07 Banned

    Messages:
    52
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    I also vote for paid article because Auto-RSS-Content could be detect as duplicate content
     
    cigadung07, Feb 23, 2009 IP
  4. contentboss

    contentboss Peon

    Messages:
    3,241
    Likes Received:
    54
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    it's the dupes that will kill you. There's no incentive for any search engine to rank a 'me too' site just stuffed with duplicate content. Why should they, when they can show the same article / post on 'yahoo.com' or somewhere else that's PR 9.

    And if you really REALLY R E A L L Y want to say 'bit I know of lots of sites in top positions with nothing but duplicate content' I'd say try using your brain
     
    contentboss, Feb 24, 2009 IP