ask.com restricting certain search terms... hello communist USA!!

Discussion in 'All Other Search Engines' started by IanVelvet, Jun 23, 2006.

  1. #1
    check out this post on www.searchengineoptimizationmarketingnow.com

    looks like ask.com thinks we are china. Who the hell are they to restrict our searches..

    and just when I was starting to like ask they go and do this crap.

    Where is the excersice of our fisrst amendment.
     
    IanVelvet, Jun 23, 2006 IP
    redhits likes this.
  2. NoobieDoobieDo

    NoobieDoobieDo Peon

    Messages:
    1,456
    Likes Received:
    53
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    Ask.com is a private company, you have no first amendment on their hardware.

    Just like you can't demand to be able to give speeches from my front yard.

    it doesn't apply.
     
    NoobieDoobieDo, Jun 23, 2006 IP
    lorien1973 likes this.
  3. lorien1973

    lorien1973 Notable Member

    Messages:
    12,206
    Likes Received:
    601
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    260
    #3
    I agree. First amendment does not apply. You ability to say "pedophile" is not impeded by not being able to search for it there. There's a difference between the right to free speech and the right to be heard (or in this case, appear in Ask's database).
     
    lorien1973, Jun 23, 2006 IP
  4. boxer126

    boxer126 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    878
    Likes Received:
    25
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    145
    #4
    I think a good analogy might be moderating a forum. If your forum does not allow people to say the word "Hell", and someone uses that term, you ban them. I'm pretty sure any search engine can "ban" certain search terms. After all, it's their site. And, why not? They don't want perverts searching for "pedophilia". I happen to agree. Start your own search engine if you don't like it. And here's the best part, you can limit search terms to only "controversial" terms.....hmmmm, I might be onto some freaky niche there.

    -boxer126
     
    boxer126, Jun 23, 2006 IP
  5. EGS

    EGS Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,078
    Likes Received:
    438
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    290
    #5
    This is an interesting find - at one instance, I see why Ask.com restricts specific search queries, but at another I see why it could be bad for the end-user and innocent internet researcher.
     
    EGS, Jun 23, 2006 IP
  6. netPH

    netPH Active Member

    Messages:
    275
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    60
    #6
    *maybe* they're, (ask) trying to brand themselves as "kids safe search"?
     
    netPH, Jun 24, 2006 IP
  7. ForgottenCreature

    ForgottenCreature Notable Member

    Messages:
    7,473
    Likes Received:
    173
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    260
    #7
    That is the stupidest article I have ever read. Im quite happy to see such search phrases banned from all search engines because websites targeting those phrases are primarily to deliver just that illegal and disgusting content. If you arent happy about those phrases being banned, find another search engine, you have no rights to tell them what they can or cannot include in their listings.
     
    ForgottenCreature, Jun 24, 2006 IP
  8. TheHoff

    TheHoff Peon

    Messages:
    1,530
    Likes Received:
    130
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #8
    0 results found for 'Cleveland Ohio'

    Did you mean 'Cleveland Steamer'?
     
    TheHoff, Jun 24, 2006 IP
  9. lorien1973

    lorien1973 Notable Member

    Messages:
    12,206
    Likes Received:
    601
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    260
    #9
    0 results found for portugeuse man o war'

    Did you mean 'portugeuse breakfast'?

    (still not sure what it is, despite 2 deuce bigalow movies)
     
    lorien1973, Jun 24, 2006 IP
  10. redhits

    redhits Notable Member

    Messages:
    3,023
    Likes Received:
    277
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    255
    #10
    Uhhh let me seee uhhh.... In the USA constitution... but that amendament only give you the right to be free. Being free, also mean to be able to reject something/somebody ..(like a job , option ,person) ... Ask.com is a free company , so they got the right to choose theyre destiny...

    if you ask this question , i can ask you
    "hey why you don't care about Pamela, the 300lbs girl?! "
     
    redhits, Jun 25, 2006 IP
  11. IanVelvet

    IanVelvet Peon

    Messages:
    95
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #11
    Yes they have the right. google can do the same thing but in the spirit of free speach I dont think google would ever restrict a search term because they believe in the freedom for a user to research what they want.

    google just went through a huge ordeal with china because china wanted to omit certain results.. see searchengineoptimizationmarketingnow.com for the post on tienamin square.

    communist countries are ommiting search engines results its very strange that a company in the US does that. which brings us closer to NOT having freedom.

    This country was founded on simply FREEDOM not just from religious percecution but from the idea of its counterpart (slavery)

    We have a democracy but do the people really have control? look at our electoral college..even if a candidate has teh populare vote doesnt mean he is the president. What the heck is that about? Thats not right. Recent bills have been past and decisions have been made without the approval of the senate and more importatnly the people. Checks and balances are not in place anymore and we are headed in a direction I just feel uncomfortable with. its like we are obeying the government when the government should be obyeing us!!!!

    Ask.com is a perfect example.... If I want to find out how to "fight child abuse" or "stop pedophilia" then I should be able to do so.

    what if other search engines started doing this? how would you all feel then? would you all say that because its their front lawn then they have the right to do that?

    i know I would be livid!!!

    now.. lets start a lynch mob and go burn ask.com at the stake for being communist!!!

    who's with me!!! lol
     
    IanVelvet, Jun 27, 2006 IP
  12. AnaB

    AnaB Peon

    Messages:
    1,336
    Likes Received:
    36
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #12
    Very intelligent move by ask.com I think. And why not, if they do want to brand themself as child safe, they have every right to do it and infact I think it'll make a lot of parents happy too....
     
    AnaB, Jun 27, 2006 IP
  13. infonote

    infonote Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,032
    Likes Received:
    68
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    160
    #13
    Ask can do what they want just like you can do what you want on your blog/site.

    Assuming you don't break any laws i.e.
     
    infonote, Jun 28, 2006 IP
  14. BNix

    BNix Peon

    Messages:
    224
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #14
    I guess it's in order of U.S. Defensive Ministry
     
    BNix, Jun 28, 2006 IP
  15. IanVelvet

    IanVelvet Peon

    Messages:
    95
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #15
    Well I think enough people posted about this subject that it scared ask.com

    http://www.searchengineoptimizationmarketingnow.com/?p=42

    blogs all over the world started writing about this.

    Check out the blog to get more info on it.

    http://www.searchengineoptimizationmarketingnow.com/?p=42

    I'm curious to hear what you guys think cause I know some of you were happy ask.com banned those phrases to begin w/.

    Me, I was not. :)
     
    IanVelvet, Jul 10, 2006 IP