Actually, none of the ones listed including the ones on my list will work for you. You made the statement "I am not giving up full rights to these articles" On all of these sites, you give up the full rights to the article with the stipulation that the person using the article must add your "resourse" box at the bottom of the article. What you are looking for is probably best done with individual wabsite owners. You can then retain any rights that the other person will agree to.
Thank you for being more clear. If the person using the article adds the resource, that works for me. Its when they don't give the credit to the author. Also, with these sites, they will accept the articles with embedded links in them?
Expect them to not give credit a lot too. I've searched for my articles and complained to the ones that don't add the resource but it doesn't do much good. Seems that 75% or more are honest though. Some accept embedded links, but expect the number of sites to use your srticle to go way down. Before you submit the article it is good to critically look it over and ask yourself "Would I add this to my site". Most of us would not add an article that has a bunch of links going to another site unless it is only to back up a statement in the article. Such as, "A recent Consumer Reports article stated..... View article here for more info" using this to back up how great the product is your talking about.
If I submit the exact same article to many places, won't Google consider all but one duplicate content and not credit me with more than one backlink ?
The whole idea of article submission is duplicate content. You submit to (for example) ezine, your hope is that 50-100 people will like the article and add it to thier site. Therefore lots of duplicate content. I don't believe the duplicate content thing is as bad as people often say. If 50 sites have your article and someone does a search that would bring it up, reasonably Google only wants to show the article once in the SERPs. Therefore, Google chooses one and all others are filtered out. This is reasonable, and is not a penalty. That does not mean that having duplicate content on your site is bad or even looked down on by the search engines (think of all the news organizations that redistribute the same article). What is bad about duplicate content is that if that is all your site has there is a good chance it will never show in the SERPs. You need unique articles so that you will get search engine refferals. Having some duplicate articles on your site will not hurt, if it is good for your visitor that is fine, likely they have never seen it before and might find it usefull. Just don't count on them showing in the SERPs. As far as not counting as a link, that doesn't make sence either. If the person thought your article was good enough to add to their site, that is a vote in your favor. There are millions of articles out there and they chose yours.
Thank you for the information. I'm not concerned about duplicate content on my site. I might not even post the articles there. I'm wondering if Google will credit me with multiple backlinks for each place the article is published or just one backlink and consider the others duplicates.