Are you affraid?

Did you join before or after you were on welfare?

 

Yet you still can't find a source for your magic screenshot. Just random posts reflecting hatred. Why am I not surprised?

 

You're funny, man!

I post a bunch of undeniable facts and you call them 'magical'.

I'm honored!

Denial is not just a river in Egypt, Gtech!

 

Now there's the spirit!

 

I joined straight out of high school. They definitely wouldn't let gays in back then

BTW, I bookmarked your post.

http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=910025&postcount=46

This is a classic example of liberals. Pretending to care about the welfare of the troops by being against the war in Iraq, and then turning around and stabbing them in the back. You are not the first to do it here.

Now that you've made it clear you have no regard for the military, it's even more clear to me why you didn't answer the question of "which side are you rooting for." Don't worry though, you don't have to avoid answering the question for a fourth time. I know now

Liberals...nothing but blind hatred.

 

A picture from photobucket is not an undeniable fact. There are 92,000 people in Iraq who are honored too

 

If you give an object or an invidual an adjective, you need something to compare it with. You need to measure it. Otherway, your(yes your.. Crazy Rob) opinion is useless.

 

Ok, please post the 'real numbers' then, Gtech.

I don't know why you're even arguing about this. At least pick something that isn't so clear cut. I PWNT you a page ago...and I still PWN you until you can disprove those numbers.

 

Heh, that more that answers it

 

Wow maybe I could have joined and then been a welfare, like you.

I'm not stabbing them in back, I am just making a true statement, and I don't put military people on a pedstal. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to sign the papers and go to boot camp. People join mostly for economic reasons, they need help financially or need structure or whatever.

How many people actually stay in the army and make a carreer out of it?

 

Let me see if I understand this...posting any image with some numbers makes it correct, until someone can disprove them? Is that how you want to play it? Because I see you didn't disprove any of the numbers of lives saved. It begs to question; does blind hatred facilitate double standards?

I had no idea you swung that way

 

Okay, getting back to the original question which still hasn't been answered,

what has Bush actually achieved in the war on terror?

I'd like to hear your views on that as from my standpoint none of the original objectives have been achieved. The leaders are still at large and seemingly able to move freely, the organisation still has their funing and if anything seem to be more poerful than ever. More new recruits flock to them because of the occuaption of Iraq, and terrorist attacks are on the increase.

 

Wishing things weren't true doesn't do anyone any good. That's what Bush likes to do and it's screwed things up pretty badly.

Anyway, the "magical image" I posted containg facts can be found anywhere. I even posted sources to back them up. So I'm not sure if your helmet is on crooked or what, but you're starting to scare me. I really hope your just goofing around. Otherwise, like I said before, you're quickly entering 'latehorn territory'. AND DAT AINT GOOD!



PWNT!

 

I was never on welfare. Once again, showing your true colors towards the military.

You most certainly are stabbing them in the back and twisting the knife as you do it. "Or whatever?" You really don't have a clue. Just lob something out and hope it sticks.

Go look it up. As if you would actually care

 

I believe you meant to say "Wishing things were true doesn't do anyone any good."

There is no source for the image you posted. Zero. I checked the links you posted, unless you went back and edited them. Of course, you could just post the source, but the only contention I've made is that it was unsourced. And still is.

 

Nice dirty sanchez pic, ferret!

 

Just as I suspected...always trying to make an argument out of nothing so that you're PWNAGE isn't quite as obvious to everyone.

You should be ashamed, Mr. Tech!

 

Latehorn, this was a good observation:

If you give an object or an invidual an adjective, you need something to compare it with. You need to measure it. Otherway, your(yes your.. Crazy Rob) opinion is useless.

 

I have to hand it you guys, your sheer brillaiance at debate, ignoring questions you don't have the answers to and decending into irrelevancy would put most politicians to shame