Are Nofollow links good for SERP reasons?

Discussion in 'Search Engine Optimization' started by jophan, Dec 15, 2009.

  1. #1
    Hello,

    often there is the view that nofollow links are worthless.

    A nofollow link will simply not pass any PR value to the destination urls.

    But this doesnt mean that these wont have any ranking factor, does it?

    Google will still see it as a link and will count it into the ranking calculation, thats what I think is logical to assume.

    What are your views or experiences?
     
    jophan, Dec 15, 2009 IP
  2. softech02

    softech02 Banned

    Messages:
    920
    Likes Received:
    28
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    70
    #2
    Well no follow links stop crawling.
     
    softech02, Dec 15, 2009 IP
  3. redthehat

    redthehat Peon

    Messages:
    434
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    No Follow tags are useful for if you are trying to avoid a bot from following that link for whatever reason. Maybe the anchor text doesnt match the links keywords, etc etc. There are a ton of reasons why people would use them, personally, I use them on every page that has the anchor text "Home" as my home page generally doesnt contain content related to "home", but that is just me. You want to allow the bots to follow links with anchor text that refer to the content, especially when it comes to content within your own site.
     
    redthehat, Dec 15, 2009 IP
  4. bruce_robart

    bruce_robart Member

    Messages:
    547
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    #4
    Google is not counting no follow links as your website back links is but oblivious its worthless..
     
    bruce_robart, Dec 15, 2009 IP
  5. redthehat

    redthehat Peon

    Messages:
    434
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    It is rumored that Yahoo and Bing ignore the nofollow rel tags, however I am still yet to find proof of this.
     
    redthehat, Dec 15, 2009 IP
  6. anllyy

    anllyy Peon

    Messages:
    211
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    I think you are right. And I also heard that nofollow tag has been reduced the importance. Someone begain to worry about the spammers.

    It is hard to say it is good or not to build backlinks in nofollow blogs or forum. Because that depends on what you want to do. If you want to join the topic and leave a link, fine, we welcome you. But if you just want to spam, even you leave your link in dofollow blog or forums, you will be banned and your link will be deleted.

    So, do not care it is nofollow or dofollow. Have fun, you are just helping peoples or you are just talking.
     
    anllyy, Dec 15, 2009 IP
  7. Stella_Roberts

    Stella_Roberts Peon

    Messages:
    101
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    Hi there,
    I don't think the no follow links are any useful for SEO point of view because Google doesn't crawl them and thus it doesn't count in back links, yes but it could be useful for increasing the traffic.
     
    Stella_Roberts, Dec 15, 2009 IP
  8. bloomsden

    bloomsden Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    807
    Likes Received:
    15
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    145
    #8
    bloomsden, Dec 15, 2009 IP
  9. redthehat

    redthehat Peon

    Messages:
    434
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    ... which further emplasizes my point. No Follow tags are extremely useful from an SEO point of view, as they do stop crawling of certain links on site. THis doesnt just refer to outgoing links, this refers to internal links as well.

    As an example. At the top of most pages, you have a link that says either "Home" or "Home Page". I recommend setting this as nofollow for the fact that the anchor text doesnt refer to content. For a better optimized page, I recommend either setting that to be no follow and adding keyword links at the bottom of the page that are all able top be crawled, or just set the home link as nofollow all together.
     
    redthehat, Dec 15, 2009 IP
  10. AlexHarvwey

    AlexHarvwey Peon

    Messages:
    72
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #10
    Yes, i also agreed
     
    AlexHarvwey, Dec 16, 2009 IP
  11. john86

    john86 Peon

    Messages:
    54
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #11
    Google does't count nofollow in backlinks but all search engines like Yahoo, and MSN all include nofollow links in site backlink and if see visitors points of view its not bad.
     
    john86, Dec 16, 2009 IP
  12. rickysmartin

    rickysmartin Peon

    Messages:
    17
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #12
    no follow are not useless for SERPs because they increse your click through rate...

    its no matter that crawl or not ..matter this link give you access to your page and that click count in search engines results..

    Affordable SEO company India
     
    rickysmartin, Dec 16, 2009 IP
  13. CheapSEO

    CheapSEO Guest

    Messages:
    974
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #13
    You have 924 posts and how can i believe you that you don't know about follow or nofollow? anyway, nofollow links are not profitable if you are promoting your website on keywords. Search engines don't count back links and don't help to ranking.
     
    CheapSEO, Dec 16, 2009 IP
  14. jophan

    jophan Active Member

    Messages:
    1,309
    Likes Received:
    14
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    98
    #14
    I wanted to hear peoples view about it. And its not clear if these nofollow links are really worthless
    regarding SERPs. There are also other views of well experienced SEOs who claim something different than
    what the general view here is.
    Talking about the amount of posts, well, look at the posts of the members here who have left a
    comment, they all seem to be "new" SEOs if we just take their post amount into account, and you are
    also one of them.
     
    jophan, Dec 16, 2009 IP
  15. Serpico

    Serpico Peon

    Messages:
    432
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #15
    I've seen lots of posts where people have ranked high with just nofollow links. So I wouldn't count them out personally.
     
    Serpico, Dec 16, 2009 IP
  16. scheng1

    scheng1 Peon

    Messages:
    1,255
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #16
    all things being equal, I will make comments on dofollow blogs rather than nofollow blog. Most dofollow blogs have more comments, and that means the search engines will have to crawl more frequently.
     
    scheng1, Dec 16, 2009 IP
  17. smartware

    smartware Active Member

    Messages:
    101
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    51
    #17
    If you go to the source code of any nofollow you'll find : 'rel=nofollow'
    That directly orders the crawler not to follow the link / not to visit the website through that link. So its may not useful for SERP perspective.

    But

    At the end of the day you want revenue not SERP result. SE Spider doesn't yield cash for you but a human visitor does. nofollow or dofollow doesn't make any sense for a person.

    Assume that you are in a hot discussion forum and you give a link there and you found so many visitors on the other day. Whether your link was nofollow/dofollow is not a matter. so link where ever its is possible.

    Cheers. ;)

    unInvited GuesT
     
    smartware, Dec 16, 2009 IP
  18. seotran

    seotran Peon

    Messages:
    39
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #18
    NoFollow Links do not pass any link juice because spiders stop here.
    Has any one an idea why somebody with over 900 posts cannot google "nofollow"?
     
    seotran, Dec 16, 2009 IP