Apache vs Litespeed

Discussion in 'Apache' started by Hosshost, Oct 17, 2009.

0
  1. #1
    I was thinking that it could be beneficial to have a thread that explains the pros and cons of Litespeed webserver. I'll start it off:

    Pro's: 600% faster than apache. Graceful restart.
    Con's: Not industry standard in webservers. Need to install.
     
    Hosshost, Oct 17, 2009 IP
  2. Bohra

    Bohra Prominent Member

    Messages:
    12,573
    Likes Received:
    537
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #2
    Bohra, Oct 18, 2009 IP
  3. Hosshost

    Hosshost Peon

    Messages:
    58
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    Hmmm, thanks. That was pretty helpful.
     
    Hosshost, Oct 18, 2009 IP
  4. Volt.Networks

    Volt.Networks Peon

    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    Another con is that it costs money to get a license for LiteSpeed.
     
    Volt.Networks, Oct 18, 2009 IP
  5. Hosshost

    Hosshost Peon

    Messages:
    58
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    Not the standard version.
     
    Hosshost, Oct 18, 2009 IP
  6. Bohra

    Bohra Prominent Member

    Messages:
    12,573
    Likes Received:
    537
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #6
    The standard version sucks apache is much better than standard version
     
    Bohra, Oct 18, 2009 IP