Anyone who wants out is "Helping the Enemy"

I am so sick and tired of being called an aider and abettor because I want out of Iraq, AND I MEAN YESTERDAY!!!

Today after working about 12 hours, on the way home, I got stuck in traffic. An accident on a two lane highway... slowed us all down to a crawl. So I flipped on the radio. There I heard some num-nuts flipping out on folks that want out of Iraq. "Don't these idiots realize they are helping the enemy?" he asked rhetorically. "Don't they realize they are helping to kill Americans???" he screamed.

Hey!!! Jerk-off! F--- the f---ing enemy!!! This message ain't to or for them, irregardless of what they might think. They don't think regular to begin with. Every American consideration by American voters ain't about or for THEM!!! What a convoluted assessment of my position.

Hey, here's a good one... How bout it being for US!!! How about pulling out for US???

First off, if we pull our people out now, how can that be cause for killing more American soldiers? If I had my way they'd be OUT OF HARMS WAY tomorrow!!!

But secondly, and more to the point. We would not be "helping the enemy," by statintg we should not be there anymore, we would be helping our "allies." Because they NEED TO KNOW WE ARE NOT THERE FOR THE LONG RUN!!! That's right, boyos, so GET YOUR SHIT TOGETHER. This is your country. You are on the clock boyos, so - Get your shit together!!!

Iowa needs some lovin' right f---ing now!!!

 

Was it GTech?

 

So generally then, you think if something is difficult it's not worth doing ?

Because that's how it sounds, what do you think would happen to that country now if co-allition forces just up'ed and left ?

Murder, that's what would happen, we started so we have to finish, stop your belly aching and just be thankful you're not out there fighting the fight.

 

So you would rather have a new Vietnam? That would only help the dems....we leave now and we leave a world of terrorism behind, just so we can be attacked again...I think the dems word for what you want to do is "redeployment"....the conservative term is "appeaser"

 

murders are happening right now even with us there, and some of them are Americans being killed

what exactly will be a "finish" and what if the "finish" doesn't happen in 20 years do you think we should stay there for another 20 years?

 

Sounds like GTech is famous around this part of the forum.

 

Nope, wasn't me. I know what Dead Corn's position is and why, as he's covered it numerous times here. It's different than mine, but I respect it and can understand it. There's times I feel the same way.

There are a number of terrorist supporters here who make no effort to disguise such at all. Dead Corn is *not* one of them, that is for sure.

 

Murders happened before we were there...thanks to saddam

The finish looks like a democratice govt. totally in control....we are about 60% there...a govt. is there, and the iraqi govt. is taking more control every day...

 

Didn't they already all leave, at least most of them?

 

After 6 years, The Afghanistan president controls the area around his palace, so hopefully in a couple of years, Iraq's president and prime minister will be in control of the area around their palace.

 

How many US deaths have happened in Afghanistan lately, where terrorists have been run out of the country? How many verses Iraq where terrorists abound? When you actually do som research and come up with a factual answer, then you can post it...I look forward to never hearing from you again.

 

This thread emboldens the enemy!

 

is just me or is d16man a totally un-informed idiot

you should actually just read some news and then actaully come back with an opinion

instead of just making up fantasy, you sound like a little kid, which is fine being young and interested in current events but

Terrorists have been run out of the country?

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/asiapcf/02/14/afghanistan.troops/

Really try reading some actual news and get back to us

 

No buddy, it's not just you.

 

From CNN, your favorite biased website:

"There have been 515 coalition deaths -- 355 Americans" in afghanistan Link

Vs.

"There have been 3,386 coalition deaths -- 3,130 Americans" in Iraq Link

What astounds me is that the news media loves to keep this running tab...can they help the terrorists more??

Theres some facts for you, straight from your favorite biased website...BTW, the link you posted to CNN said this:

"Expecting the resurgent Taliban to stage a spring offensive"...which means "HASN'T HAPPENED YET!!!" Sounds to me like you are the one that is actually un-informed...

 

ok now tell us the total nubmer of troops and each place

then tell us the precentage killed or wounded in each place based on that

 

How about this gem

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/meast/02/15/war.plans.ap/index.html

They thought that there would only be 5000 troops in Iraq at this point, when they were planning the war

These people should fired, resign, commit sucide in shame ...something

 

A) I was just providing factual information based on the quote you said was stupid....
B) I got the information from CNN's website...if you want to know how each died, then go here: Afghanistan Iraq It is a list of every soldier, and how they died....

What other FACTS can I get you today? Since you think I am an idiot who doesn't do the research??


This is to funny:

This is whats funny....you really have no idea who is in charge, do you? Tommy Franks is no longer in charge...Army Gen. David H. Petraeus is....those people that "screwed up"...have resigned, or have gone on to do other things...please read the articles and know you argument before posting...thanks.

 

Apparently it's just you that is the idiot, as he seems to be owning you rather nicely.

Besides, it's not like everyone doesn't already know how you feel about those dumb soldiers or how you punk your freedoms off their backs. Why pretend to care when you feel it's to a political advantage, as if you hold some high moral ground?

 

The personal attack limit has been reached.



Thread closed!