Anyone want a cut of 600 Billion Dollars?

What he is saying TOOT is that jets fly over our homes but drop bombs on poor peoples homes and how would you like it if your ass was in fear like they are

 

Uh, yea, if you go back up one post, you can see where I said "Vietnan was good and spraying agent orange was good too." I also talked about how Cheney hit me in the head with a haliburton briefcase and how bush snuck into my garage one night to steal my can of oil.

</sarcasm>

Didn't you see it?

You have to remember Anthony, I'm not disappointed in the Iraqis freedom and I'm not disappointed in fighting terrorists. That disappointment seems to lie in your court, for whatever reason.

So what you are saying, as usual, is that you hope for the worst for your country?

 

Cheney and Bush are the worst for this nation GTech, when will you get that through your thick skull

 

About the same time you stop being disappointed in Iraqi's freedom and start posting against terrorists. What are the odds?

 

So since Russia and China are sending weapons into the war zone we should call them Nuclear powered terrorist nations GTech

 

Yes! Another political debate!

But I will need some time to put my thoughts together. Keep it going guys.

 

Not true. Most of the 'people' of the world know more about the US than the US. in knowledge terms.

Most countries outside the US have alot of input from the US - from Baywatch to technology. What Iceland does has almost no impact on the US but what the US does has a huge Impact on Iceland.
Can you name the Icelandic president ? I bet evveryone in Iceland knows bush

 

Doesn't matter to me, call them what you like! Maybe we should call them victims and sympathize with their plights?

 

These are not debates, they are truth against propaganda and GTech's gang loses each one

PS: No GTech, we should just start WWIII and get this shit overwith.

Ready for the big flash of light that your side is rushing us into GTech

What the hell GTech, war is good, look at what we got done in Vietnam

 

How come you don't answer my post with numbers from energy department?

can you name one other industry that had 75% net income increase from quarter to quarter and makes 70,000,000,000 dollars extra profit a year without any investment or increase in cost?

 

Welcome to the debate! We always have fun with these. It typically goes in a circular fashion. Anthony posts about Bush stealing oil. We disprove it. So Anthony shows his disappointment in Iraqi freedom. We respond to it. Then Anthony makes up something new about Halliburton, and we debunk it. Then Anthony brings up Nixon (we haven't figured that one out yet, it seems to be just a stalling technique) and we let him him know Nixon is dead and no longer makes politcy. Then Anthony will inject something useless about Vietnam, to discredit their service to our country. And then he will talk about the price of oil, except that it's back down, then the economy, which is good, but if you listen to him, we all eat out of trash bins and live in card board boxes.

Those are pretty much the standard circular talking points. But it's always fun

 

Gworld, GTech never answers facts or points, he just searches for RNC approved propaganda to post and PR from the White House

 

Let me give you a simplified version:
1. AC thinks the republican neo cons are all bad.
2. Gtech thinks the sunshines out of their %$£*

Neither has ANY middle ground...

 

I'm totally with you anthonycea. I believe the perpose of this Iraqi war is for profit than anything else, and this sdministration, in fact this whole system, has been ripping people off for too long.

But I also see a lot of facts coming from different side of view, and they appears to be as valid as anything we could put up. So i call it a debate, because it is facts vs. facts. If you take everything other people have to say as propaganda, you will never want to listen to them because you will only try to make them look wrong. If it is going to be shouting at the wall, what's the point of starting this discussion?

My point is, it is true that US propaganda, like in all other countries, mislead its citizen so the people in power can abuse their power. But That doesn't automatically make all Republican or war supporters' speeches "propaganda". They might have good point, too, and we should respect those valid argument accordingly.

And remember, there is always a middle ground for the Hutts.

 

What's to answer? You don't like oil companies? Supply and demand get out of balance and the cost of oil goes up? Supply comes back in line and cost goes down?

Is it a multiple choice question? Just because an industry makes money, doesn't mean I disapprove of them. I have nothing, either for, or against oil companies. They, like any other company are in business to make a profit, not give handouts. They deliver gasoline to the station, I buy it. I have nothing against Marriott Hotels. They provide rooms to stay in, I sleep in them. No one owes me a handout. I make my own way and I don't complain about others that do the same.

 

Funny how GTech has made a name for himself worldwide by crawling out from under his rock to post to all of these threads.

It makes you wonder how much Cheney pays him to fumble his defense here on DP

 

I don't even know where Iceland is - just kidding, right below Greenland, correct? (i swear I didn't have to look it up)

I was referring for the reason human beings vote for their political representatives though. And I am convinced that everywhere in the world people vote based on who they believe will satisfy their own pesonal interest before anything else, no matter narrow minded the issue may be. people will decide based on issues such as if you have to clean your dog's poop off of the sidewalk and how high the fines should be if you violate the laws.

Human nature is selfish, that's just how it is. Everyone only looks at his/her own situation and wants to come out well or whatever they consider well.

The problem and the reason we are here is that Anthony cannot accept that.

Like someone here said before: blame the democrats for running Kerry
and as I wanna add:

look back 8 years ago and blame Al Gore for not allowing to let Clinton (the man who ever got him up therre in the first place) to help him campaign.
People don't respect spineless assholes like that.

I am NOT a republican but in the past 8 years I could not see a better choice than Bush. I was fo Perot in the 90s and then for Clinton once but not everything that glitters is gold. Those guys like Clinton don't care about Americans like Anthony wants us to believe, they are all in it for themselves.
Sorry, but I don't believe in people and their motives too much, we are what we are, the good, the bad, the ugly. I choose to eliminate what in my mind are the worst possible solutions and what was left for me to vote for was Bush.

 

Yes and now is the time for some COLLECTIVE responsibility. 'I just buy it' doesnt cut it these days.

 

So what TOOT, I remember people that voted for Nixon TWICE, he was the originator of election fraud in America and was indited for it and put up for impeachment.

Bush stole both elections, he did not beat Gore or Kerry, get real man

 

In the UK we now have a technical dictatorship. Labour is the best 'for us' but still 75% voted AGAINST him.