Can you tell me how to get...If you gonna do more songs I request Barney: I love you, you love me we're a happy family! EDIT: Peace
Nintendo Stay out of something that you have NO idea about. IRAQ WAS INVENTED BY THE BRITS SADDAM AND BUSH *WERE* FRIENDS WE SUPPLIED EVENYTHING SADDAM NEEDED TO DESTORY PEOPLE (THEY WERENT *HIS* PEOPLE - AND WE STOPPED HIM WHEN HE WAS DOING IT HUH? - NO WE GOT INVOLVED WHEN OUR MONEY WAS AT STAKE. WHO THE HELL HAS FREEDOM? CLINTON DID ALOT - READ UP TERRORIST ONLY EXIST WHEN COUNTRIES/ PEOPLE ARE REPRESSED YOU DONT BLOW UP COUNTRIES TO ATTACk 20- 30 PEOPLE THAT DESTROYED THE WTC. DARE YOU TO CALL ME A TERRORIST SUPPORTER. STICK TO MOD REWRITES - Your knowedge is EXCELLENT, on this topic you are BEYOND NIAVE. CHECK W's APRROVAL RATING PRIOR TO THE WAR (SEE THATCHER/ FALKLANDS). - Its is EXACTLY this kind of HATRED THAT CAUSES ALL THE PROBLEMS IN THE FIRST PLACE.
02:33 AM hes right your wrong. yah clinton did a lot, had a lot of sex with that women The red rep I have never given a damn about, but whoever is gutless enough to write this message to me can post here happily, because its OBVIOUS that this particular is very linear, watch a couple of TV shows about clinton (not one person would be in this forum WITHOUT sex in the first place). Can an age limit be put on the rep button ? Then again it must be hard to use a PC + sit on a chair with NO spine.. maybe you believe that lots of sex gets you to be president huh? You appear to me the mental equivelent of chewing gum on my shoe..prove me wrong
I think he's talking about this! :::WHO THE HELL HAS FREEDOM? It's called not living in communism or terrorism. :::CLINTON DID ALOT - READ UP Right, he bombed a few Iraq aspirin factories and didn't get Osama bin Laden when he had the chance.
Terrorism and Communism are NOT places. Have you ever lived in either?? 'Terrorism' is 2004/ 2005 buzz word, so keep using it, it doesnt make you look silly at all! Who were bin ladens friends ? did bush catch him yet?? Did the binladens get flown OUT of the US ? Daisy cutters are the best way to catch 1 guy huh? I never said clinton was wonderful (and if you had read up you would know clinton did lots wrong ASIDE from getting a blowjob - hardly the worst crime IMO) Again, if you are going to make pointless and borderline racist (us vs them) comments just give up now. Ive seen the constant "i look like a terrorist" crap from you... and actually, you look like an attention seeking geek - which is not a bad thing. - do you know a terrorist? have you ever met one ? do they all have beards? are they all muslim? do you know anyone that has been blown up ? Or is that what your local TV station told you? Nintendo you are a smart guy, dont fall for all that rubbish. For someone that says they hardly ever leave the house etc.. you have quite strong opinions.. If I judged you the way you are judging people then we would never speak. As I have said before with 1 BILLION muslims - Imagine if the WERE terrorists.. The world would have died along time ago. From Chechnya to Australia everyone that disagrees with any government is being called a terrorist.. What would YOU do if the Iranian army came to your local town and declared martial law because some guy blew up an Iranian commercial centre ?? Would you fight ? Would you then be a terrorist or is it ok for you because you are not as dark or hairy ?
Nintendo Can you tell me why Americans are so fascinated by someone getting a blow job? Jealousy I can understand because another guy is getting it but crime? If getting a blow job is a crime then I volunteer to be a full time criminal.
G, your really getting sloppy with your talking points here. Nobody gives a pigs shit about the BJ. She was hot, I bet he loved it. What we are pissed about is the fact that a president lied under oath and was caught in the act. Sad really. Go ahead, change the subject and jump on the Bush bashing wagon now. Don't let us down.
And not only that, but it's important to note that during the exact time of the hearings, Clinton had an opportunity to take bin laden out, but didn't take it. One of three opportunities he had to do so, but failed to act. DA, we've disagreed many times and exchanged greens a number of times as well. I've always respected debating with you. Having said that, I disagree with what you are saying. Here's why: The bin ladens getting flown out of country. Has nothing to do with anything really. Richard Clarke took credit for doing that of his own accord. Reports also note that they were debriefed. It's a long dead issue. Daisy cutters and one guy. bin laden was not one guy, but the leader of a terrorist network with operations in virtually every country. Let alone a huge army in Afghanistan. Again, has nothing really to do with current disucssion. When did knowing a terrorist, meeting a terrorist or whether they all have beards or not become a determining factor that someone can be against their actions? The world was almost taken over by islam once. And there is no doubt they want to do it again. Even here in the US, we have members of CAIR who have ties to terrorism and have made such a claim. It's not something that is hidden. Many prominent clerics around the world, including in your country as well, have indicated that is their wish. It's what they are supposed to do, according to their faith. Disagreeing with a government does not a terrorist make. A terrorist is not necessarily one that pulls the trigger. There are many terrorist enablers (supporters) that provide housing, financial aide, logistical support, etc. Those that want terrorists to win in Iraq. I consider those terrorist supporters. Doing nothing is not a solution. Though there are many that would not fight for anything, no matter what, there are many that would. Depends on a number of factors. If my country had been taken over by thugs who brutally murdered the way the Taliban did, oppressed women and took away our rights as citizens and created an overall cespool of living conditions as they did, and the Iranians were there to capture one of those thugs and make things better, then I would support them. The color of their skin or the amount of back hair they have would have nothing to do with it. But then we can't compare apples to oranges, can we? Because we know that's not going to happen. It's a poor comparison at best. I think many mistake the killing the terrorists commit daily in Iraq with that of actions of the US. It's unfortunate that people cannot differentiate. It's frieghtening that some want the coalition to pull out so the terrorists can win and take over that country. How anyone could support terrorists in that manner is beyond me, but some do.
lied under oath seems like nothing. I've always like the 'falsification of evidence' and 'tampering with a witness'. Don't dismiss these he confessed to these in his confession as well. They were really creative.
Bin laden was in the position he was in because originally he was on the 'other' side. Fighting against the Russians. Since then he has been a jilted lover by the US - I think this situation is VERY personal to them both. No need to soften me up first.. i your opinions are your opinions and you do the best job Ive ever seen of articulating the republican position. Fairplay - I would still never call it a dead issue though. Is the 'iraq dossier' david kelly, greg dyke ? This is my WHOLE point, when countries have 'big' weapons then 'terrorists' dont really operate. In his and millions of eyes he is NOT a terrorist as he was fighting back - I dont agree with that - he/ they killed innocents therefore he/they were out of line. Its all realted, so is relevant to the current discussion. Your right it doesnt at all. Please dont refer to Islam as if it IS terrorism - its not. Also it is not what they are supposed to do according to their faith (read religions of the 'book' must be protected) Oklahoma, IRA - they are not very muslim terrorists to me. Islam ran as far as spain once upon a time. There are 1 BILLION muslims - have you ever seen any group of people that big having a the same agenda? Again - throwing round the word 'terrorist' if you were in Iraq and your house accidently got blown up by the US army and you lost family members, then proceeded to try and blow up a US base - does that make you a terrorist ? I am not so sure.. If you killl people you are a murderer. Terrorist is a cop out and an easy way to label people. Doing less would def help. Less bully tatics - we are reaching a point in the world where almost anyone / or country will soon have the power to destroy the world single handedly, If you think pushing your/ my / any country's agenda on another will not reap the worst rewards then watchout. It is not really a policable situation. For example http://www.google.com/search?hs=1Ot...US:official&q=how+to+make+anthrax&btnG=Search http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&...official&q=how+to+make+nuclear+weapon&spell=1 How did the taliban get into power ? Because women and young girls were being raped, beaten and murdered by the northern alliance (the guys formally known as mujahadin). The taliban made the women cover up, banned them from going anywhere and started cutting heads and hands off those that would commit crimes. Yes it got out of hand + yes a stadium full of those watching the beheadings is NOT right, but this situation came out of necessity and has since been warped by the taliban (who will at somepoint try and get back to where they were). Afghanistan is a mess because WE made it that way. It was used as a fighting ground for years. I still dont think it looks better now + the drug production is going through the roof - causing even more problems. yes it does, compare palestinian & african deaths to whites. The way the world currently is means that 1 white guy is worth more than any other colour. - This is NOT actually a colour issue but that IS they way round it is. As shown by the millions dying everywhere - if white babies were starving in Africa I am SURE it would be THE biggest priority. Its academic - I am saying when you go somewhere and damage it, people become "terrorists" because they have no other way to fight back. I dont want them to pull out, I dont support them and I 'dont support the troops' (i dont want anyone to die at the hands of another), the complete destruction of civil liberties, indefinite holding of POSSIBLE suspects, deporting those that are 'not conducive with the views of their country'. I understand why its all necessary BUT I dont think any of its right at all. The whole point is we are doing a GREAT job of getting any future kids I may have blown up. Doing what we are currently (and have been for decades) is only going to lead to destruction and the world is getting so much smaller that it wil be on EVERYONEs doorstep.
I disagree. He was fighting an immediate threat, one that at the time, we considered a threat to the world as well. Politics is often choosing the lesser of two evils at a given moment in time. bin laden never agreed to be an ally forever, as is apparent by his actions. That still does not discount the fact that Clinton, three times (including AFTER bin laden declared war on our country), had the opportunity to take him out and chose not to. Three times. Like people with airplanes that fly into buildings? The taliban had a choice. Give him up. We gave them ample time. Yes, it is. I challenge you to spend time *really* reading the quaran and the hadiths. It is full of violence and hatred towards other religions. But even more importantly, we see daily how the hatred towards others is used in real life situations. It is not tolerant of other religions. I will cede that not all muslims are terrorists, but virtually all terrorists are muslim. And it's a serious problem that is affecting the world over. We are not fighting Iraqis. We are fighting terrorists who have infiltrated Iraq. They are terrorists. They are killing Iraqis indescriminately, even targeting them specifically. This is terrorism. Doing less would help the terrorists achieve their objective. But I'm not interested in their well-being or helping them achieve their goals. We did less in the 90s under Clinton. They continued to attack our country and other countries around the world. It is what they do. It didn't start when Bush became president. Clinton chose inaction as the best course of action and it allowed them to scale up their terrorist network and attack us (and others) with no reprise. Bush has taken a different approach and I support that. Aromatherapy and hand-holding sessions are not a solution. Negotiating with people that want your death is not an option. Afghanistan has long been a cespool of islamic terrorists. We didn't make it that way. The taliban could have avoided an invasion. They had a choice. They made their choice. I have no source to compare such. Nor do I think it has anything to do with muslims killing others around the world. Comments I've heard others make from time to time. The problem I have with comments like those directly above is, the people that tend to make them are always attacking the US and coalition forces as if they are there to kill Iraqis. When in fact, is terrorists that have infiltrated from surrounding countries and even Europe that are indescriminately killing the Iraqi people. But they never mention that, for some reason. I fully support the UK in deporting the scumbags who preach in their mosques hatred towards their country and incite the members to take up arms against it. You have the right to call that sort of hatred tolerable, for whatever noble reason. I suspect many Britons, like many Americans, are proud of their country and don't want hateful people that directly threaten their well-being in their country. I sure wouldn't. How does one tolerate the intolerant?
Afternoon boys. Still at it i see. Think you need to get out more nintendo. Glad to see a few people are making sence of the sittuation
We sent money... big deal. If we actually cared we would have sent PEOPLE. People help people, not money. Corrupt officials and workers will be enjoying large sums of that money... and why we were all waiting to decide how much to give them.. and how to get it to them... people were over there snatching up little kids for the black market. This is actually quite stupid. When we should be closing our borders to illegal (have we all forgotten what the word ILLEGAL means?) immigrants we're promoting them... encouraging them to come on and break the law. "kick back and enjoy a beer"... see the pleasures you get to take advantage of... why millions in Africa starve to death and die from genocide... what are we doing about that why you enjoy your precious beer? Say what you want. The U.S. have dropped enough bombs in Iraq killing far far more INNOCENT people than saddam did in 30 years. Only when we do it.. there's an excuse... You also forget to mention how many other countries abuse human rights and kill their own citizens. I guess next we should invade all of them right... that's your logic here... I'd say invading a country, flying over it and dropping 5-20,000 lb bombs on peoples homes and businesses, and killing, and wounding thousands of women and children... might be exactly like a terorrist.. but since we're there to take all of Saddam's WMD's away... its ok, nobody will be mad...
This is exactly the kind of debate I didnt really want to get into with you.. we could end up here for days running round in circles. I prefer watching you dance with AC than being your partner.. and gworld is waiting his turn So, if its alright with you Ill graciously step down.. maybe we'll have a better opportunity to discuss this, but i got things i gotta concentrate on and politics is not high on the list at them moment. (Im not a clinton supporter either + didnt said it was all bush's' fault)
DesignAgent, I completely understand. We'll catch up another time. yo-yo, where on God's green earth do you get your information? Do you not even care about accuracy? That's one sad ass, inaccurate and reactive response.