Anyone have actual evidence for or against cloaking?

Discussion in 'Search Engine Optimization' started by lsample20, Mar 29, 2006.

  1. #1
    Being fairly new to SEO, my research thus far has shown a lot of competing websites in my industry using cloaking to help their rankings.

    Anyone use cloaking successfully? Anyone had negative effects from cloaking?

    What cloaking software do you use?
     
    lsample20, Mar 29, 2006 IP
  2. INV

    INV Peon

    Messages:
    1,686
    Likes Received:
    101
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    If you have a legit business in a competative area there is no way you should be risking cloaking. Even if you manage to rank a cloaked page which is no different from a regular page in competative areas you are facing potencial ban which will come quickly in competative areas.

    Also this is basiclly a whitehat forum, so you wont learn anything about cloaking for blackhat. Check out other websites that support this since you seem to be new at cloaking anyway.
     
    INV, Mar 29, 2006 IP
  3. HalfAgain

    HalfAgain Peon

    Messages:
    143
    Likes Received:
    8
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    Eh, you're a little off. Only the site you cloak will get banned, not the one you redirect to. Otherwise, guys would cloak to their competitors pages. I've used search engine cloaker with moderate results. Nothing incredible, but I've made a few bucks off it.
     
    HalfAgain, Mar 29, 2006 IP
  4. lsample20

    lsample20 Guest

    Messages:
    109
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    Excellent. That's the kind of information I'm lookin for!
     
    lsample20, Mar 29, 2006 IP
  5. tryme1

    tryme1 Guest

    Messages:
    306
    Likes Received:
    15
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    My personal view is that cloaking is a pretty pointless method of search engine optimization. There are better ways of achieving the same result with no worries about getting banned and potentially greater pay offs in the end.

    It's radical, I know, but why not create a good, worthwhile site that people (yup, yer actual real people) will use and return to.
     
    tryme1, Mar 29, 2006 IP
  6. INV

    INV Peon

    Messages:
    1,686
    Likes Received:
    101
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6

    You are using the "if so then a competitor can do it" too loosely. If you are in a competitive market and your website doesnt belong there while a manual review happens you are risking the chance of getting removed.

    Sure, its a method that works. But again why would you risk this on a major website? If your website is garbage to begin with and your in for the quick money then go for it.

    Also about the competitor sabotaging others rankings has been done many times and its a practice that people apply all the time.
     
    INV, Mar 29, 2006 IP
  7. lsample20

    lsample20 Guest

    Messages:
    109
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    It looks like most are saying that cloaking does work, but you may be taking a risk. How high is that risk? Has anyone been banned themselves specifically for cloaking?
     
    lsample20, Mar 29, 2006 IP
  8. alifan

    alifan Peon

    Messages:
    46
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #8
    Didnt Bwm.De get removed from google for this i cant post urls but search google for "bmw.de google ban" and its the top link
     
    alifan, Mar 30, 2006 IP
  9. BILZ

    BILZ Peon

    Messages:
    1,515
    Likes Received:
    62
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    It depends on your motives for cloaking and what exactly you are cloaking. If you are using a bandwidth detector to display different content to dial-up users this is obviously not a malicious action. I cant beleive a SE would ban you for something that imrpoves your user's experience.

    If youre only intentions are to exploit the SEs, dont do it. If you have a legitimate use for cloaking...do it...The user should come first.
     
    BILZ, Mar 30, 2006 IP
  10. BILZ

    BILZ Peon

    Messages:
    1,515
    Likes Received:
    62
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #10
    Here's the link to that article: http://blog.outer-court.com/archive/2006-02-04-n60.html

    The interesting thing that i took from that article is that the BMW site had the offending cloaked doorway pages for over two years. Which is kinda sad on Google's part. If it takes 2 years for a major site like that to get caught cloaking, how much longer can one of us get away with it?


    UPDATE:
    I just checked the BMW.de site and it is back up to a PR7. LOL. so they get away with spamming for 2 years. get caught and google lets them back into the index. LOL. Thats just rediculous.
     
    BILZ, Mar 30, 2006 IP
  11. HalfAgain

    HalfAgain Peon

    Messages:
    143
    Likes Received:
    8
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #11

    To address your concerns :)

    1) Cloaking a website that doesn't belong in the market in most cases is useless. Why would someone looking for dog treats click on my porn site link?

    2) "Also about the competitor sabotaging others rankings has been done many times and its a practice that people apply all the time."
    Sure, but not by using cloaking ;)

    3) What are you risking? The end site that recieves your cloaked, redirected traffic doesn't get banned (in my experience, not to say this could never happen).
     
    HalfAgain, Mar 30, 2006 IP
  12. webcloaker

    webcloaker Member

    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    #12
    I cloak quite a few of my domains, and have been doing it for over 3 years and have never been banned.
     
    webcloaker, Mar 30, 2006 IP
  13. hulkster

    hulkster Peon

    Messages:
    1,705
    Likes Received:
    93
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #13
    BMW.DE was re-instated in like a week.

    You can be sure there was a discussion about this ... and I bet one of 'em was "we got away with this for two years and made a million bucks - but we got banned for a week ... ummmmm ... can we get away with it again?"

    Google sent a great message when they banned 'em - I was disappointed by the followup though.
     
    hulkster, Mar 30, 2006 IP
  14. relixx

    relixx Active Member

    Messages:
    946
    Likes Received:
    54
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    70
    #14
    This is the internet. Let's not dwell on this question :p
     
    relixx, Mar 30, 2006 IP
  15. Sir Tom

    Sir Tom Banned

    Messages:
    203
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #15
    One thing you to consider is that cloaking isnt an out of the box miracle technique. You still need to figure out the keyword density, keywords, titles, links etc. and do it all in a way to get high search results but to not raise a spam flag.

    In regards to performance, I had some great success with cloaking about 1-2 years ago, getting 1,000+ uniques a day on each cloaking for very-very competitive keywords.

    I basically stopped cloaking, but tried it out again about a few months ago and I have had very minimal success.
     
    Sir Tom, Apr 1, 2006 IP