We're talking about (of all things, mind you) soldiers drinking beer. If it really bugs you, contact your senator or congressman. Speculation.
Not speculation, if Bush does as it appears his aids are suggesting he do would you support it? Showing support for something before it happens if there is an indication it might happen is not speculation, it shows where you stand on the issue.
Not realy as you can still post what you feel, otherwise it just appears you don't wish to take the subject matter up? If Bush does veto it would you support it?
Now your back to attacking soldiers again, yo-yo? Just like I pointed out, you don't care. As long as you can paint them in the worst of light.
I tried to view it earlier and got a blank page saying "NO SERVICE AVAILABLE" .. its back up now, I'll read over it.
Sorry but that answer only appears to be an answer so that you can somehow justify it if it happens It is not speculation to say you would support a veto or not.
Yes, it is speculation. The event has not taken place. That's why it's called speculation: spec·u·la·tion Audio pronunciation of "speculation" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (spky-lshn) n. 1. 1. Contemplation or consideration of a subject; meditation. 2. A conclusion, opinion, or theory reached by conjecture. 3. Reasoning based on inconclusive evidence; conjecture or supposition. 2. 1. Engagement in risky business transactions on the chance of quick or considerable profit. 2. A commercial or financial transaction involving speculation.
Do you think we should just overlook all the bad things America and our troops do because you want to support the war? Honestly... don't you think it's important to take note when crimes against humanity are being violated by our own men and women? How can we possibly be any better than the terrorists themselves when we let these crimes go on without punishment?? Where's your justification? That some day it will make the U.S. safer??
No it is not, your opinion which is your opinion of either you would support a veto or not is not speculation. That is your opinion of which should be done before the fact, just like any law passed, invasion of a country, etc. --edit so in other words you do not wish to share your opinion of what should be done until the speculation of if it is done or not is out of the woods because of it either being vetoed or not. Again I am not asking you to speculate, but share your opinion of what should be done, and if it is vetoed would you support that, not speculation on the act or if it will be done in itself.
Here's the source: http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/BOU403A.html Care to share how you know it's photoshopped?
When I see you post something positive, your claim might have meaning. Isn't that your purpose? Who went unpunished? The head choppers? I don't need a justification. I don't sell my country out. Those few that have been identified have been punished.
I'm not all about selling my country out, but I'm not about ignoring the lies and facts either. The article about soldiers just said that the crimes are often unpunished or "lightly" punished. What is that teaching these guys? When they've been robbing and raping Iraqi's for 3 years in Iraq and come back here who's to say they're not going to do the same? Believe me I like our country, that's why I still live here. But there is way too much bad things being done by our government and our troops and our citizens to just overlook it all and pretend we're on some great mission to save the world from bad guys.
I've seen nothing to the contrary. It's called war. It's called Lyndi England and others in jail. You chose the article for your perspective. I've seen nothing but contempt for the military. Perhaps you'd like to just come right on out and paint everyone with the same picture? Write your congressman or senator.