Yes, it says things like: 1. The political literacy rate has fallen to apalling lows. 2. The left-wing media has fully abandoned the Western Civilization which gave them birth. 3. Our civilization is now rich enough to support a lot of people who choose to spend their time protesting instead of working. 4. The Muslim fanatics who seek to destroy Western Civilization may just have a chance. I wouldn't bet on them, but hey, you never know.
I determined.. HAHAHAHA - are you joking with me? Sell them the weapons, let them use it, then try and take it away, then punish then take out.. nice. Thats because you are sitting on your comfy sofa not likely to get shot or bombed are ya? So your opinions are worthless, Gtech I respect because he has valid reasoning, if misguided behind his opinions. You will care when some decides vengance on your little piece of the planet. Ha.. I thought you didnt care! and you cant have one without the other. If they hadnt maybe you could point them in the right direction with your infinite ignorance (self declared - see above)
gworld, I don't mind debating with you, but if I am, I expect you to answer AND commentate, along with questions. I'm not going to spend a cycle answering to you. I presented commentary above, along with some counter questions, which you completely ignored. May I suggest you study the format DA and I are currently going in? Civil debate, which I always appreciate, with each party providing commentary and each party offering counter opposing questions. It works to allow both parties the opportunity to provide their views, the basis for their foundations and offer follow up questions.
DA: Please edit your post to make some sort of logical sense, or at least to display a reasonable train of thought. It would even be improved if you actually read my post correctly before replying to it. It would certainly be improved if you actually understood my post before replying to it. In brief, you should be quite embarassed for making a posting of such poor quality.
Will, I should be embarassed? because you think you are a better typer? You think people are illiterate of politics because they protest. That everyone is a sponger except you ? Left wing media ? Western civilization vs Muslim fanatics? Oklahomer bomber was not a muslim. Civilised? The japanese when asked why they use chopsticks say "We dont like to butcher our food at the table" A serious question Will. Are you a racist? Let me ask you a genuine question. Are you racist ?
You should be embarassed, not because you can't type, but because you won't think. Of course not. Let me ask you a question. Are you an imbecile?
Does this mean that you have no answer to give? I play your game and I will put to you the following question, you can answer it and point by point and I will reply in the same manner. 1- In your opinion, is it enough for government to say that some one is guilty of crime in order to imprison that person for indefinite time? If the answer is yes, can we apply the same principle to all crimes and send everyone that police says they have evidence for crime to jail without courts, judge or jury? 2- In your opinion, does everyone has the right to defend himself in court of law against the crimes that he is suspected of, or you do not believe in law and the court system? 3- In your opinion, if people can be arrested without any trial or conviction and imprisoned for indefinite period of time, what is the difference between what is happening in USA and former Soviet Union, China ( I think they do some kind of show trials before sending to prison) and other totalitarian regimes?
Sorry gworld, but apparently you didn't read my post very well. I left questions and commentary and you intentionally avoided them. I don't mind a civil debate with anyone, but it works both ways. You are welcome to pick that post back up, comment and carry forward your counter questions. I've gotta warn you though, I'm not interested in defending terrorists or their rights. You are welcome to do such, if that is what motivates you.
HA, you have brightened my day with all your sarcastic posts.. Am I an imbecile? I hope so.. But coming from a guy who "doesnt care why" his govt is blowing people up and shooting them and his fellow man is getting shot and killed. Only that they are doing it. I got warned you would get your knickers in a twist + you believe millions that protest are all ignorant unlikely the mighty Will Spencer, who knows more than his own government about what their foreign policy should be, but at the same time doesnt care what their reasonings are.. No wonder my posts are in a mess im trying to figure you out!! ha
I answered every question and comment that you had but I understand your refusal to discuss this. After all the destruction of legal system, taking away the civil liberties, imprisoning people without any trial and conviction is a hard thing to defend, even for you.
Weapons of mass destruction (WMD) are weapons designed to kill large numbers of people, typically targeting civilians and military personnel alike. Some types of WMDs are considered to have a psychological impact rather than a strictly military usefulness. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weapon_of_mass_destruction Considering the definition, a huge machine gun or fighter plane could be a "WMD".. So I guess I can't really say that some nerve gas isn't. But I do remember this "Bush Calls Iraq Imminent Threat" (http://www.ph.ucla.edu/epi/bioter/iraqimminent.html) ... I don't think anyone can say that 20 tons of nerve gas on the other side of the world is an "imminent threat" to the United States. They didn't have a feasible means of getting it into the United states...
No gworld, you didn't. But if you would, I would gladly continue forward with you. The choice is really yours. Make the best of it
Don't you remember right before the War Bush claiming he had proof that Iraq was shipping remote control drone planes into the US to dispence the WMD's? Am I the only one who remembers that speech? I don't see anyone on the right or left bring that mass error of judgement up. That's right that was when everyone was still frozen by fear and believed every single word of 'terror' that came out of GWB's mouth, now is it just a bad dream?
So could saddam hussein. The link you are looking for is: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/01/20030128-19.html Some do misquote Bush by saying he said "imminent threat." In fact, what he said was, "Some have said we must not act until the threat is imminent."