Anti-War 100,000 - Pro-War 400

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by gworld, Sep 25, 2005.

  1. GRIM

    GRIM Prominent Member

    Messages:
    12,638
    Likes Received:
    733
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    360
    #961
    Hyrogen peroxide, so I take it you have the concentration of those found?

    Oxygen itself would not be banned, only if combined with fluorine if I'm reading this correctly, what's your take?
    Is not nitric acid it is a different form.
    http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/N/nitric_acid.html


    Furthermore:
    Ongoing monitoring and verification, not a full and total ban.

    If I'm misreading your debate on this I appologize, but I did see these on the link provided that contradicts what you had posted 'from what I took from the read'. Or does the info you are stating this time come from a different link? Or am I not seeing the section that these items are banned, if so can you point me to them?

    Very interesting to say the least :)
     
    GRIM, Oct 2, 2005 IP
  2. digitalpoint

    digitalpoint Overlord of no one Staff

    Messages:
    38,334
    Likes Received:
    2,613
    Best Answers:
    462
    Trophy Points:
    710
    Digital Goods:
    29
    #962
    #43 for "Pro-War". hehe
     
    digitalpoint, Oct 2, 2005 IP
  3. ferret77

    ferret77 Heretic

    Messages:
    5,276
    Likes Received:
    230
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #963
    I beat this thread beats the wepeons guys homepage for his name, what the name of the nazi-bush , vx guy again?
     
    ferret77, Oct 2, 2005 IP
  4. GRIM

    GRIM Prominent Member

    Messages:
    12,638
    Likes Received:
    733
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    360
    #964
    You should make it mandatory anyone who participates in a political discussion must give a direct link to dp if they have not already done so from one of their sites :)

    Thank you for the forum btw.
     
    GRIM, Oct 2, 2005 IP
  5. GTech

    GTech Rob Jones for President!

    Messages:
    15,836
    Likes Received:
    571
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #965
    They are not listed. How concetrated do you think it would be, as part of 20 tons?


    Good observation. We don't have a list of all the chemicals, only a few.

    Nitric acid is used, along with sulfuric acid (another of the components in the list) to make nitroglycern. Nitroglycerin contains nitric acid, as evidenced by the link I provided.

    The only way you would be misreading me, is if you think these chemicals were not banned. Whether under seal or monitored, they were on the list for a reason.
     
    GTech, Oct 2, 2005 IP
  6. GTech

    GTech Rob Jones for President!

    Messages:
    15,836
    Likes Received:
    571
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #966
    Agreed, thank you for letting us hash all these issues, Shawn.
     
    GTech, Oct 2, 2005 IP
  7. GTech

    GTech Rob Jones for President!

    Messages:
    15,836
    Likes Received:
    571
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #967
    Gotta head out. G'night hrbl, ferret, Mike, yo-yo, gworld and others.

    Another day, another debate.
     
    GTech, Oct 2, 2005 IP
  8. caseagainstbushcom

    caseagainstbushcom Peon

    Messages:
    60
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #968
     
    caseagainstbushcom, Oct 2, 2005 IP
  9. GRIM

    GRIM Prominent Member

    Messages:
    12,638
    Likes Received:
    733
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    360
    #969
    Weren't the chemicals still seperate #1, #2 without the known consentration there is noway at all to know if they are banned or not.

    Ok but where exactly does it state Nitric acid is banned?

    Before you stated the following of which you state nitric acid is banned, I however did not see any mention of nitric acid being banned.

    I also did not see any mention of sulfuric acid, do you have the quote from that on the link you posted?

     
    GRIM, Oct 2, 2005 IP
  10. GRIM

    GRIM Prominent Member

    Messages:
    12,638
    Likes Received:
    733
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    360
    #970
    You as well, damn another day I got barely any work done :)
    Ohwell time for a beer.
     
    GRIM, Oct 2, 2005 IP
  11. Blogmaster

    Blogmaster Blood Type Dating Affiliate Manager

    Messages:
    25,924
    Likes Received:
    1,354
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    380
    #971
    Good idea, let's all hang out somewhere watch a game for an hour, and then come back to fighting in here :)
     
    Blogmaster, Oct 2, 2005 IP
  12. gworld

    gworld Prominent Member

    Messages:
    11,324
    Likes Received:
    615
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #972
    Gtech

    1- Sulfuric Acid- was not banned and it is not WMD.

    2- OXYGEN- was not banned and it is not WMD

    3- Nitric Acid- was not banned and it is not WMD, Annex is about METAL FUEL for MISSLES and the percentage of Nitric acid in such fuels.

    4- Hyrogen peroxide -was not banned and it is not WMD, Annex is about METAL FUEL for MISSLES and the percentage of Hyrogen peroxide in such fuels.

    5-Nitroglycerin- it is an explosive and dangerous but it was not banned and it is not WMD.
     
    gworld, Oct 2, 2005 IP
  13. GTech

    GTech Rob Jones for President!

    Messages:
    15,836
    Likes Received:
    571
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #973
    I never said sulfuric acid was. Twice now I've repeated this, please take note for your sanity.

    http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/l...final-report/isg-final-report_vol1_rfp-05.htm


    Oxygen, as noted by hrbl, was only banned when combined with other agents.

    The rest, stands, much to your dismay.
     
    GTech, Oct 2, 2005 IP
  14. GTech

    GTech Rob Jones for President!

    Messages:
    15,836
    Likes Received:
    571
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #974

    For it to be a lie, I would have had to known differently. I did not. I have not discussed unemployment rates much, and recalled the the 5.6% value raised when democrats were knocking Bush on the rate at which they hailed Clinton, as evidenced by many articles on the web. Just one of such:

    http://truthnews.com/world/2004030080.htm

    Perhaps you'll find a better format to refrain from joining a forum day one, and calling established members liars. Wanna discuss issues? Great. Wanna prove me wrong with predefined search links to google, go for it.
     
    GTech, Oct 2, 2005 IP
  15. Crazy_Rob

    Crazy_Rob I seen't it!

    Messages:
    13,157
    Likes Received:
    1,366
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    360
    #975
    [​IMG]
     
    Crazy_Rob, Oct 2, 2005 IP
  16. yo-yo

    yo-yo Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,619
    Likes Received:
    206
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    185
    #976
    I'm willing to bet you showed up from viewing your source logs and seeing that people were coming to your site from the links I provided them, And I welcome you to join us :)

    You'll notice quite quickly that Gtech and several other members are die-hard bush fans, and will avoid any facts presented that prove he is a bad president and a liar. They will keep avoiding them by supplying diversions and or other things until you seemingly forget about them.

    Great site you have btw... I'm starting gogetemcowboy.com right now in inspiration of this thread :D
     
    yo-yo, Oct 2, 2005 IP
  17. Crazy_Rob

    Crazy_Rob I seen't it!

    Messages:
    13,157
    Likes Received:
    1,366
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    360
    #977
    Crazy_Rob, Oct 2, 2005 IP
  18. caseagainstbushcom

    caseagainstbushcom Peon

    Messages:
    60
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #978
    Show me one item that is not truthful or shut up.
     
    caseagainstbushcom, Oct 3, 2005 IP
  19. caseagainstbushcom

    caseagainstbushcom Peon

    Messages:
    60
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #979
    Yes. They are typical RepubliCON scum who cannot and will not address the facts because the facts ae irrefutably against them. As I have already pointed out GTech is a liar. He has absurdly claimed that the "Unemployment rate is currently 4.9%. A number NEVER reached in the Clinton administration" when in fact, 44 out of 97 months of Bill Clinton were spent at or below 4.9%. That's 45.35% of Clinton's time in office spent at or below 4.9%. But just go ahead and lie.

    Thank you all for compliments. Spread the word.
     
    caseagainstbushcom, Oct 3, 2005 IP
  20. caseagainstbushcom

    caseagainstbushcom Peon

    Messages:
    60
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #980
    Check out the legal case against Bush.
    http://caseagainstbush.blogspot.com/2005/06/legal-grounds-for-impeachment-of.html
     
    caseagainstbushcom, Oct 3, 2005 IP
    Crazy_Rob likes this.