1. Advertising
    y u no do it?

    Advertising (learn more)

    Advertise virtually anything here, with CPM banner ads, CPM email ads and CPC contextual links. You can target relevant areas of the site and show ads based on geographical location of the user if you wish.

    Starts at just $1 per CPM or $0.10 per CPC.

Anti-War 100,000 - Pro-War 400

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by gworld, Sep 25, 2005.

  1. yo-yo

    yo-yo Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,619
    Likes Received:
    206
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    185
    #801
    http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/06/06/findlaw.analysis.dean.wmd/
     
    yo-yo, Sep 30, 2005 IP
  2. gworld

    gworld Prominent Member

    Messages:
    11,324
    Likes Received:
    615
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #802
    gworld, Sep 30, 2005 IP
  3. GTech

    GTech Rob Jones for President!

    Messages:
    15,836
    Likes Received:
    571
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #803
    What happens when you combine them, along with other chemicals? Hmm, al qaida, 80,000 people. What is gworld trying to protect them from?

    What else? World Trade Center?

    What happens when just 1,300 lbs of this mixture goes off?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Trade_Center_bombing

    That wasn't even a ton.

    gworld, please pass the mouthwash :rolleyes:
     
    GTech, Sep 30, 2005 IP
  4. GTech

    GTech Rob Jones for President!

    Messages:
    15,836
    Likes Received:
    571
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #804
    Yep, especially since the document's date is June 2003. It sure covers it all :rolleyes:

    Can someone do a quality control check here before posting :D

    Take a look at my post above and note what your mouthwash can do ;)

    Provide one link that says 20 tons of chemical wmd that can kill 80,000 people would not be considered a "wmd."
     
    GTech, Sep 30, 2005 IP
  5. gworld

    gworld Prominent Member

    Messages:
    11,324
    Likes Received:
    615
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #805
    That are many things in the world that explode, for example Gasoline. In 9/11 they used airplanes, does this make an airplane or jet fuel WMD? :confused:

    If you want to prove chemicals can explode, I will 100% agree with you.
    Nobody is disputing that chemicals, even household chemicals including mouth wash can go BOOM and explode but it doesn't make it a WMD.

    Gtech

    Provide one source that says Sulfuric Acid, Hydrogen prexoide are classified as WMD.
     
    gworld, Sep 30, 2005 IP
  6. yo-yo

    yo-yo Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,619
    Likes Received:
    206
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    185
    #806
    The date doesn't matter. Those are real things President Bush said to justify this war. So why don't you answer my post (#800) with 4 questions big boy?? ;)
     
    yo-yo, Sep 30, 2005 IP
  7. GTech

    GTech Rob Jones for President!

    Messages:
    15,836
    Likes Received:
    571
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #807
    yo-yo, here the answers to all four questions: It was Bush's fault that oil refineries were not built since the mid-70s. Oh wait, those were different questions, were they not?

    Cut me a break!

    Actually, I was ordering some pizza and reading what Andy Oppenheimer, a wmd specialist, had to say about the chemical wmd in the Jordan plot :D
     
    GTech, Sep 30, 2005 IP
  8. GTech

    GTech Rob Jones for President!

    Messages:
    15,836
    Likes Received:
    571
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #808
    Oh, I put Andy Oppenheimer in there so gworld could get a head start on trying to discredit him, and make his background into nothing more than a Tennessee squirrel trader :)
     
    GTech, Sep 30, 2005 IP
  9. yo-yo

    yo-yo Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,619
    Likes Received:
    206
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    185
    #809
    Keep dodging the questions, it's fine. They are facts that will stand.

    In fact, I have no more use posting in this thread until one of the pro-war mongers cares to take a crack at them. :)
     
    yo-yo, Sep 30, 2005 IP
  10. debunked

    debunked Prominent Member

    Messages:
    7,298
    Likes Received:
    416
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #810
    gtech, there has to be a reason someone would have so much of 1 type of material hidden in storage out in no-man's land with military protection. Maybe, because lystorine wanted to start a factory out there. Come on, don't be so stupid you redneck, just cause you are a racist doesn't mean someone was planning to use that large of an amount to harm anyone. geeeeesh.

    shoot, I think my neighbor has a few hundred tons being stored now, just in case there is a shortage some day.

    gtech you must be graping at straws to get that kind of idea from that report.
     
    debunked, Sep 30, 2005 IP
  11. debunked

    debunked Prominent Member

    Messages:
    7,298
    Likes Received:
    416
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #811
    gtech do you like war mongers? If so then you are pro war monger. ???? Am I missing something here?? what is up with this kind of comment?

    Is Ganges Kong in the house?
     
    debunked, Sep 30, 2005 IP
  12. GTech

    GTech Rob Jones for President!

    Messages:
    15,836
    Likes Received:
    571
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #812
    Did you leave out nitroglycerin on purpose again?

    They are not classified as wmd, individually. And while that is your intention to trivialize their importance, they were not located individually, but together. And when mixed together, can be a chemical wmd.

    You only want one source, right? And that source should have some credentials behind him, right? Say, like, a WMD expert? One that is used by and/or mentioned by a broad range of media who have relied upon his expertise and commentary in dealing with such issues?
     
    GTech, Sep 30, 2005 IP
  13. GTech

    GTech Rob Jones for President!

    Messages:
    15,836
    Likes Received:
    571
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #813
    Dodging? You'd think one might appreciate my efforts at dealing with one nut job at a time. It's not like I'm an environmentalist with the important mission of making sure there are no more oil refineries setup, so people can blame it on Bush!

    Take your ball and go. You have no significant importance to me at all ;)
     
    GTech, Sep 30, 2005 IP
  14. yo-yo

    yo-yo Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,619
    Likes Received:
    206
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    185
    #814
    Instead of posting about nothing, why dont you take a crack at the facts posted??

    I know why ;)

    because you have no solid reason as to why we can't find the thousands of tons of sarin and nerve gas, the fleet of flying devices to spread biological and chemical weapons everywhere, the strong evidence of saddam trying to make nuclear bombs or the hiding of the "worst weapons ever devised"

    So instead you make excuses like saddam supported terrorist (without any factual basis), or dodge the facts completely because they make you look foolish ;)

    Lets hear some more excuses :)
     
    yo-yo, Sep 30, 2005 IP
  15. GTech

    GTech Rob Jones for President!

    Messages:
    15,836
    Likes Received:
    571
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #815
    I thought the little kid was leaving?
     
    GTech, Sep 30, 2005 IP
  16. yo-yo

    yo-yo Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,619
    Likes Received:
    206
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    185
    #816
    :rolleyes:
     
    yo-yo, Sep 30, 2005 IP
  17. GTech

    GTech Rob Jones for President!

    Messages:
    15,836
    Likes Received:
    571
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #817
    One minute your leaving, the next not? You'd think someone would at least have some sort of credibility on something!

    Which is it?
     
    GTech, Sep 30, 2005 IP
  18. zman

    zman Peon

    Messages:
    3,113
    Likes Received:
    180
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #818
    none of the above.

    A) No credibility
     
    zman, Sep 30, 2005 IP
  19. yo-yo

    yo-yo Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,619
    Likes Received:
    206
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    185
    #819
    Your right. Keep dodging the facts posted. Real smart group of guys the "pro war" side has ;)

    The only thing any of have you have even stated in the last 40 pages remotely smart was that if you mix a bunch of common chemicals together you can kill people and label it a WMD.

    Man you guys are really good at debating!! I think the pro war side is really winning this one!!!
     
    yo-yo, Sep 30, 2005 IP
  20. zman

    zman Peon

    Messages:
    3,113
    Likes Received:
    180
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #820

    Yep, no credibility. :)
     
    zman, Sep 30, 2005 IP