Anti-War 100,000 - Pro-War 400

http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/06/06/findlaw.analysis.dean.wmd/

 

This is a great source since it has documented all the lies according to the time line.

Gtech

Provide one source that says Sulfuric Acid, Hydrogen prexoide are classified as WMD.

 

What happens when you combine them, along with other chemicals? Hmm, al qaida, 80,000 people. What is gworld trying to protect them from?

What else? World Trade Center?

What happens when just 1,300 lbs of this mixture goes off?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Trade_Center_bombing

That wasn't even a ton.

gworld, please pass the mouthwash

 

Yep, especially since the document's date is June 2003. It sure covers it all

Can someone do a quality control check here before posting

Take a look at my post above and note what your mouthwash can do

Provide one link that says 20 tons of chemical wmd that can kill 80,000 people would not be considered a "wmd."

 

That are many things in the world that explode, for example Gasoline. In 9/11 they used airplanes, does this make an airplane or jet fuel WMD?

If you want to prove chemicals can explode, I will 100% agree with you.
Nobody is disputing that chemicals, even household chemicals including mouth wash can go BOOM and explode but it doesn't make it a WMD.

Gtech

Provide one source that says Sulfuric Acid, Hydrogen prexoide are classified as WMD.

 

The date doesn't matter. Those are real things President Bush said to justify this war. So why don't you answer my post (#800) with 4 questions big boy??

 

yo-yo, here the answers to all four questions: It was Bush's fault that oil refineries were not built since the mid-70s. Oh wait, those were different questions, were they not?

Cut me a break!

Actually, I was ordering some pizza and reading what Andy Oppenheimer, a wmd specialist, had to say about the chemical wmd in the Jordan plot

 

Oh, I put Andy Oppenheimer in there so gworld could get a head start on trying to discredit him, and make his background into nothing more than a Tennessee squirrel trader

 

Keep dodging the questions, it's fine. They are facts that will stand.

In fact, I have no more use posting in this thread until one of the pro-war mongers cares to take a crack at them.

 

gtech, there has to be a reason someone would have so much of 1 type of material hidden in storage out in no-man's land with military protection. Maybe, because lystorine wanted to start a factory out there. Come on, don't be so stupid you redneck, just cause you are a racist doesn't mean someone was planning to use that large of an amount to harm anyone. geeeeesh.

shoot, I think my neighbor has a few hundred tons being stored now, just in case there is a shortage some day.

gtech you must be graping at straws to get that kind of idea from that report.

 

gtech do you like war mongers? If so then you are pro war monger. ???? Am I missing something here?? what is up with this kind of comment?

Is Ganges Kong in the house?

 

Did you leave out nitroglycerin on purpose again?

They are not classified as wmd, individually. And while that is your intention to trivialize their importance, they were not located individually, but together. And when mixed together, can be a chemical wmd.

You only want one source, right? And that source should have some credentials behind him, right? Say, like, a WMD expert? One that is used by and/or mentioned by a broad range of media who have relied upon his expertise and commentary in dealing with such issues?

 

Dodging? You'd think one might appreciate my efforts at dealing with one nut job at a time. It's not like I'm an environmentalist with the important mission of making sure there are no more oil refineries setup, so people can blame it on Bush!

Take your ball and go. You have no significant importance to me at all

 

Instead of posting about nothing, why dont you take a crack at the facts posted??

I know why

because you have no solid reason as to why we can't find the thousands of tons of sarin and nerve gas, the fleet of flying devices to spread biological and chemical weapons everywhere, the strong evidence of saddam trying to make nuclear bombs or the hiding of the "worst weapons ever devised"

So instead you make excuses like saddam supported terrorist (without any factual basis), or dodge the facts completely because they make you look foolish

Lets hear some more excuses

 

I thought the little kid was leaving?

 

One minute your leaving, the next not? You'd think someone would at least have some sort of credibility on something!

Which is it?

 

none of the above.

A) No credibility

 

Your right. Keep dodging the facts posted. Real smart group of guys the "pro war" side has

The only thing any of have you have even stated in the last 40 pages remotely smart was that if you mix a bunch of common chemicals together you can kill people and label it a WMD.

Man you guys are really good at debating!! I think the pro war side is really winning this one!!!

 

Yep, no credibility.