Anti-War 100,000 - Pro-War 400

Yes, this why I (or was it you??) tried to pawn off information as test tubes when there was not a word of it. How do I change my thinking to make up the facts as I go along, and dismiss anything that comes up? No thanks, there's no honor in being a liberal

No, I posted (not found) a series of articles that cover a wide range of issues, including looting wmd, chemical wmd (sorry, gworld thinks it's mouthwash), weapons moved to syria, the UN saying weapons were moved to Syria and more. At no time have I ever said there were stock piles. But again, I don't assert that twenty tons of chemical wmd used in a plot to kill 80,000 people were mouthwash. I suspect their defense team is not using that line of rational either!

Good for you! I knew you had some excuse. No, you were quite clear it was just test tubes and such. Wanna rehash the post and test your integrity

Nope. But if you think I did, quote it!

You'll understand if I don't start taking lessons in patriotism from someone like you, of course

 

Never left. I like how you try and portray it though. Amusing.

Not at all. Why would I when all you'll do is come back with...

Stupid? HAHA! Thats old school!

I could go on and on but Gworld, you really should try and get a hold of yourself. Your process is so predictable.

You start a thread on a baseless topic, then as the thread progresses you get more and more offensive until finally you leave the thread and never come back.

Want to see a link of the very thing I am speaking of? I even posted a link here in this thread and you ignored it.

What is clear here, is your agenda. You throw out bait, wait for a bite, and then go on the attack.

Sad but funny.

 

And just for those curious about what I am talking about. Here is a place where Gwuss turned to insults and ran.

http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=28646&page=12

Never to come back. What a shame.

 

I'm pretty sure the article said, test tubes, centrifuges etc, whats the link again?

 

Stand by, I'll find the post.

 

I FREELY ADMIT THAT I SAID AND I STILL SAY THAT GTECH AND YOUR POSTINGS REGARDING WMD IS STUPID AND IT IS NOT BASED ON ANY FACTS OR LOGICS.

What is your point, can you answer the questions in post #740, 744?

YOU CAN CALL ME ANYTHING YOU LIKE AND TERRORIST SYMPATHIZER IF YOU WISH BUT IT DOES NOT CHANGE THE FACT THAT YOUR POSTINGS ARE NONSENSE AS PROVED BY MANY ARTICLES AND LINKS THAT I HAVE PROVIDED REGARDING INTERNATIONAL TREATIES FOR WMD.


Provide one source that says Sulfuric Acid, Hydrogen prexoide are classified as WMD.

 

You mean like comparing chemical wmd and mouthwash?

 

Post #746 can reffered to at this point. Then scroll up to #763. Point made was ignored as usual.

 

Couldn't say it better myself

 

Sucks doesnt it?

 

Then when we lose the weapons again and they are smuggled from Syria to Iran we can start a 3rd war in Iran. Hell we might as well let the weapons go missing every time so we can invade the entire middle east!!

After that we can invade anyone with hydrogen peroxide to "preemptively" stop them from making "chemical wmd"

 

That would be terrible, it will seriously reduces the number of hot blondes.

 

Another word of wisdom from our esteemed gworld.

By the way G, didnt you used to have a few rep blocks?

 

Is that what our president did when he hit the medical factory (don't know if it is or isn't) back when lewinsky started talking and making him sweat? I am glad our current president actually cares about what is happening more than what he wants.

 

I looked and it was your usual name calling but you haven't answered yet any of my questions in post #740 or 744.

here is it again:


If we put 100,000 people in a big room and then flood the room with water and kill everyone, DOES THIS MAKE WATER A WMD? SHOULD USA ATTACK EACH COUNTRY THAT HAS WATER?

if some one goes in a place and shoot 100,000 people with an assult rifle, it doesn't make the assult rifle a WMD. Do you think a rifle is WMD?


Provide one source that says Sulfuric Acid, Hydrogen prexoide are classified as WMD.

 

How many times to I have to tell you G? I dont know anything about chemicals, I never claimed I did.

I already told several times I am not going to answer your question when A) I dont have an answer and B) Even if I did you would twist it out of context and play your usual game.

Oh, and this cracked me up.

lol, do you honestly think everyone reading here is oblivious to your tactics?

I provide a link that displays your lack of ability to stop the insults on other members, and you come back with

LMAO! Your a hoot dude.

 

Only those two count? How about nitroglycerin, which you intentionally left out? What happens when all three are combined?

I hope you're not going to tell me that brunettes suddenly become blonde, or that people in the general area suddenly have fresh breath?

20 tons. Not an amount you pick up at the local hospital or drugstore. Is there are reason you want to trivialize it?

 

I'd rather have a president with a decent IQ that doesn't act like a cowboy. A president that can give a speech or even say a single sentence that makes sense without reading it off a paper someone else wrote.

A president that doesn't go against the rest of the world and the U.N. to invade a country for producing WMD's that are never found or proven to exist.

You're right, George Bush REALLY CARES about all of us, that's why he's giving tax breaks to the richest 1% of the the american people and not the average joe that actually needs it . That's why our nations deficit is bigger than ever, and why we're spending billions and billions of dollars every month that causes the deaths of more and more people!!

We should have a president Bush day every year!!!! Yay for Bush!!!!

 

Nobody is disputing the guys intentions who had the chemicals. The entire point is THESE CHEMICALS WERE NO REASON TO INVADE IRAQ. These chemicals weren't even stolen until AFTER we invaded iraq. So unless you have any reason to believe SADDAM HAD THEM for the purpose of mixing them up to create a weapon that would kill people, they are IRRELEVANT.

Now lets get to the real debate... Where are those WMD's that SADDAM WAS MAKING for the purpose of killing people and that were going to create a threat to America?

 

You don't have an answer and you don't know about chemicals but you still insist to post about this subject and claim it was WMD.

Very interesting.