I just don't understand why he always goes to those who don't agree with him must be Nazi's or warmongers. I mean shit, if you have a good stance debate it, if you don't, STFU, it's that simple.
DA, we were talking about my family in Iraq. A few pages back I was talking about how they see it differently than what the media wants to paint it as and the gwuss completely twisted my words and conformed then into a format that would support his terror buddies and thier cause. Same ole shit, different day.
Does it also bother you when there is clear evidence of WMD that were looted, shown up elsewhere, and recently discovered again, is attempted to be dismissed by someone who blatantly lies and says it was test tubes and other non-essential supplies? How about when someone claims the vice president said something, then tries to prove it by lying and deception? How about when people say they do not support terrorists, but turn around the next day and create a thread about a terrorist behind bars seeking sympathy and understanding for him? How about when terrorists wreak havoc in Iraq and take off on murderous sprees, but terrorist supporting twirps try to blame the US for their actions? Those are all honorable things, no doubt
Whether or not that is true is irrelevant. It's not the argument. It doesn't discount the relationship with saddam. To be honest, I really don't understand why liberals make it an issue. Not because it can be so easily proved, but that it wasn't one of the conditions of war. saddam had clear conditions to meet. He choose not to. He he had a choice.
To go back to the first post the marches are the beginning of the end of our involvement in Iraq. It will take time. It won't happen immediately. Iraq is more and more like Vietnam for us and Afghanistan for the Soviets. A war w/out purpose where our soldiers die for no apparant reason. The original reasons didn't pan out. The complex reasons in the post by Minstrel by Barnett don't sell well to a big public. This is not to say that there is a war between the west and Osamma's crazies. I think we need to step back rework our thinking and go after those bas**ards in a way where we can whip their @sses. Currently this is a no win situation. We don't seem to have enough troops to control crazies entering Iraq from elsewhere. It appears our military is stretched. No one in power is saying that but the evidence is oozing out from non-official sources. Our troops are vulnerable and seemingly not fighting for a big reason that the US/west can get behind. Don't have answers but I do think the marches are the beginning of growing concern to pull out. Time will tell. Dave
I have to draw a logical conclusion from certain facts, I know that it is difficult process for you to follow but try anyway. 1- According to you, everything in the media, internet and books are only second hand information and are not trust worthy and you believe only what your sister and friends that are in Iraq tell you. 2- I knew from your previous postings that you don not agree with ferret that government tricked American in to this war. 3- The logical conclusion was since you don't believe in anything else except what your friends and family tell you, then you must have heard it from them. But if I am wrong, I am sorry and if your friend don't agree with you and also think that Americans were tricked in to this war, please post it here and congratulate them for their intelligence.
I think there is some sort of masculine issues, like if you don't support war 100% of the time, with total disregard to the cost then you might turn into a gay homeosexual. Do you guys think like if we spent the same amount of money as we spending on Iraq on intelligence, and assinations etc , that we could do better at getting rid of al queda. I mean most of the people we kill over there are probably just jerk offs with an ak-47, you guys don't think we could have waged the war on terror more surgically and more effectively.
That is a much better version than the first. Thank you for clarifying. Huh? So I choose to draw my own conclusions and listen to only those whom I trust and you say biased? LMAO!
What conditions did he not meet? From what I remember at the end we had unrestricted access to anywhere in the country we wanted to inspect including palaces. The only thing they did not have was a few records we claimed to be incomplete that they could not come up with proof for. Now maybe that is Iraq was bullshitting us, but at the end we had full access to the country via inspectors, I see this argument very weak but maybe you can change my mind
No I am a jackboot wearing brown shirt nazi storm trooper. I am sitting at my keyboard working on the brain control device we discussed at the american nazi party meeting.
It appears that most everyone in this thread is getting tired. I myself am tired. It is an honorable goal to free the oppressed. I can see that goal in operation in Iraq today. Some folks on this thread are oppressed by their own poor reasoning skills. I do not believe that they can be freed.
Your nickname palespyder, must be an expression of racial pride. You're pale and you think that you're better that everyone else because of it. Racist. I bet you drink the blood of babies while you rape their mothers, sing country music, and pray to Jesus to kill all of the black people in New Orleans for their sins.
I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I. Oh what else do I have to say ? oh yeah.. I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I.
I think the quality of your posts is going up. That posts contained fewer stupid statements than any of your other posts in this thread.