Anti-War 100,000 - Pro-War 400

The U.S. is above and beyond any conventions or prosecution for any crimes of course!

 

Oh it is not, you crying putz! Digging wholes and placing roadside bombs that kill our (not yours, the ones you always bash, but then pretend to care about with loving care when you want to show how many have died for your drama fits) is serious bidness.

 

Some people would make things up to sell their country out too

 

Is placing bombs the only reason that some one can dig a hole?

Even if the person was a terrorist (He was not), how does his action justifies killing his wife, children, neighbor's children or policemen?

“I absolutely confirm there were no terrorists in this house,” police chief Colonel Sufyan Mustafa told Reuters.

Baiji police said six people were killed and three wounded when the house was obliterated. Among the casualties were two police officers, one killed, the other wounded, they added. The youngest casualty was 14, the local police chief said.

 

It doesn't matter what anyone says except Bush. If bush calls those children and police terrorists Gtech believes it

So now we're training police who are terrorists? We seem to be making a lot of headway over there in Iraq

 

Lesson: don’t bring your wife and children with you as you dig a hole by the side of the road. I thought they were smarter than that?


D

 

Are you back on drug again? They bombed these people house.

 

gworld, on your second post why did you intentionally leave out from the original:

Seems like doubt to me. Doubt you clearly left out above, from your post on the second page. And you don't care, except to use it as a political tool. After all, you want terrorists to win in Iraq, don't want their freedom, hate them because their constitution is based on religion and don't like Iraqi women that tell you to go to hell. Why pretend you care now? Opportunist?

Who do you think you are trying to fool? The lesson is quite clear. Terrorists dig holes alongside roads to blow our troops up. It's sad that it happend, IF (and I don't use those very often) they were not terrorists, but you omitted the "doubt" intentionally to further your daily cause to bash Americans and troops, but don't dig holes. Same lesson applies to speeding towards a checkpoint and disregarding orders to stop. The same troops you often characterize under the same umbrella suggesting they torture.

Look at ya, wizzing in your pants that you found something to bash American and troops with and you can't even strategize on how to use it. I find it a refreshing departure from how you think of people who slit throats and exactly the point I was conveying in that thread. And you fell right into

You're trying to think, but nothing happens

 

Pop quiz: Houses are next to ______?

I went to the store, I drove home, I turned into my driveway from the ______?

Might want to check that first sentence I quoted. It reads kind of funny

 

I supported the removal of Saddam Huessien regardless of why Bush went in there.

It was something that needed to be done over a decade ago. Now we are there and it is done so we finish the job and stick it out.

Anti-War people are nuts just like the religous fanatics they despise.

 

In your desire to defend war crimes, you are losing all sense of common sense.

They have stated already that there was no terrorist:

Your question actually makes it even worse for the army:

IF= A possibility, condition, or stipulation

It states that IF army believed they were terrorist, why they didn't surround the house and arrest these people instead of dropping a bomb and EXECUTING indiscriminately the CIVILIANS which is a definition of war crime.

International Criminal Court

 

so most people like to dig holes next to the road as a past time in canada I suppose - now I see where the confusion is from. You see in most countries that is not a norm, and in Iraq, the holes are dug to plant bombs - get it now?

 

Can we get a grammar check on that? Please don't use content generators to construct your sentences.

Who is "they?" One source in a lone article buried in the center of the page around other stories? Coupled with doubt, no less, too.

See pop quiz.

Seems like doubt to me. Doubt you clearly left out above, from your post on the second page. And you don't care, except to use it as a political tool. After all, you want terrorists to win in Iraq, don't want their freedom, hate them because their constitution is based on religion and don't like Iraqi women that tell you to go to hell. Why pretend you care now? Opportunist?

gworld, darling, would you pretend to care for me too? Now is the perfect opportunity

Got Depends?

 

The holes in Canada are most likely used for their heads

 

Some of the reasons people dig a hole any where in the WORLD:

Plant a tree.

Install a road sign.

Install water pipes.

Install / fix telephone cables or electricity cables.

To bury garbage.

..................

Are you suggesting that everyone of these people and their family should be executed because they dig a hole?

 

appended to list to include Iraq reasons:

bury lots of bodies quickly

hiding bombs

hiding former dictators

 

Does it say anything about why people slit throats or chop off heads?

 

lorien the troll timing in and contributing nothing , as usual.

You mean the ones our troops blew up? They have a lot of holes to dig, about 30,000 now Bush has admitted to.

You mean the ones we sold them?

Considering how much destruction our bombs have brought to Iraq, without know more details, it's perfectly reasonable to assume they could be digging a hole for a LEGIT REASON. Like trying to REBUILD THEIR HOMES OUR BOMBS BLEW UP. Maybe you forgot about that.

 

Pure bunk as usual. Talk about a troll...

 

It look like your are the troll with nothing to contribute to the thread, except stupid one liners attacking other people.