In reviewing the post in question: http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=516523&postcount=3706 It is clear we were discussing Bush and the NSA program here. The fact that my comments were quoted: Your response: I'm quite comfortable this says exactly what I've been stating all along. The scenario of the discussion is current, not past presidents except to note that they had done what the current president had. I also note that had this been going on PRIOR to 9/11, which again, refers to the current president. The "if" was in reference to taking an "if" position on the NYT article, which keeps it current as well. Note also, the oft referred to hitler reference some use when debating Bush. We are clearly discussing the current president. "The president." Your last line further exemplifies this in that in the previous line, you mention "the president" and in the last line, refer to "other presidents" I stand by my position.
Can you show us where in Constitution they have denied these rights to some people or in what part of Constitution enemy combatants are mentioned? With your level of intelligence and education, I hardly doubt that you have ever read the Constitution or can understand it even if you read it.
It looks like somebody was running away. I am amazed by your stupidity that you even try to deny what happened in Vietnam.
You got to be kidding?!?!?!??!!! OK, now someone post a link to the video or sound bite on this one...
I'm not sure where you are quoting that from. He never said that. I have never once heard the President quoted as taking the name of the Lord in vein. Why is it when losing an argument liberals resort to making things up?
Proving once again you are a moron. This occurred in 1975, a full two years after the armistice was signed. I believe I mentioned this already. Re-writting history again...
Just because you DON'T WANT to believe it, does not make it a lie. Poke your head out from that computer of your once in a while and see what's going on in the real world.
Gtech you are sounding like a dirty politician/lawyer, or almost Clintonian what is the definition of the word is.... It is clear there is more to the discussion going on than just the current NSA spying, it is a discussion on previous presidents as you've even pointed out, and a discussion on what you yourself would allow 'basically a blank check' me 'within the constitution of this great land' Look at my entire response. The above should be clear with anyone with a first grade education that my response is a generalized response of your position versus my position on what a president can or can not do, taking the ex president executive order into account.... Most of my response comes from the fact of you bashing me having an 'if' and not simply stating let the president do whatever he feels fit, making the response fully factual, relevant, and not stating i think GWB violated the constitution... ---edit not to mention you yet again failed to put in the rest of my response in that post Again stating I want the 'full story' and am not taking a stance on the issue as of yet
Funny, that's what was crossing my mind in regards to you. Caught red handed and still trying to lie your way out of it. It's not like you took money from the Chinese Army or cancelled Christmas in Cambodia! Which way is the wind blowing? Kerry did something similar. Even after it was exposed there was no Christmas in Cambodia, he went right on trying to make excuses about what he said and insist it was true. Liars are just liars. That's who you voted for, right?
Welcome to my ignore list,,, It is clear what I stated, if you can't understand it there is not point in debating.. It's very sad that you're this fricken ignorant.... Lay off the crack pipe, try to comprehend and maybe you'll understand it without needing your hand held. For the last fuxxing time I NEVER, NOT ONCE STATED BUSH ACCORDING TO THE ARTICLE VIOLATED THE CONSTITUTION.................... You have failed miserably in your lack lust attempt to make an argument, guess I'm glad many on this board have been able to read just how foolish you are....