I am not mad , I am having fun exposing your lies and ignorance. I think you or one your friend is mad who gave me anonymous red rep.
Let me know when you expose something more than the farts that roll off your lips! Crying again, about red rep? I should add that to your list: Boo hoo, America is so evil and bad Boo hoo, Christians will pray me to death Boo hoo, I got a naughty red rep! I haven't spread enough rep since the last time I gave your terrorist supporting ass a red
You didn't answer the question about WMD; do you admit that you were wrong or do you think that you are right and NSA is wrong?
Nope, and I'm not going to! It's too much fun watching you get angry over it! Tell Jose "hello" for me?
What do you mean by truth? There are many actual realities outside of our mind, for example the existence of many empires as it is shown by evidence of recorded history.
Was there a deadline for finding Saddam's WMD? I am asking only because I don't really know or remember...do you guys?
You should give it up, the US liberated Iraq anyway, so you'll have to cope with it. I repeat my question, but I am not trying to prove a point, just for my knowledge I want to know: was there a deadline for finding WMD? If you know please tell me, because I think I missed that bit. It won't change my view anyway, because I believe they should have removed Saddam long ago, as soon as he wasn't of any use and only a harm to his and other people.
Bush acknowledges faulty Iraq intelligence On the positive side, he is not the last one, it seems couple of posters in DP still hasn't accepted it. Bush acknowledges faulty Iraq intelligence
PR buddy, that's only PR. In other words it's to give you some form of satisfaction. I don't agree with that because I know that you libs are going to keep on whining, moaning, crying only because you're allowed to in the western world. Try do that in your ideal countries such as Cuba, North Korea, China and Canada, but Canada only when you sovietphiles takeover, which is prob NEVER! And anyway, Bush didn't choose his intelligence, and I'm not convinced that they are wrong on WMD. One day we'll know where they are, after all I don't think he used them all and we had to go down there and check. Now you can put your house on WMD not being there or at least not being in Saddam's hands. That's a result, and what a result! Try saying it isn't...
Well Bush is convinced that they were wrong. Collin Powell is convinced that they were wrong. NSA is convinced that they were wrong. The group that was send to Iraq by USA government to search for the WMD is convinced that they were wrong. But all these doesn't matter since you are not convinced and you know better than US government, so you must be right.
Muahahahahahahaha! Exactly. I have absolutely no idea why gworld keeps harping on "WMD" like some retarded child would keep muttering "my blankey; my blankey." Potential WMD was just one of many good reasons for the U.S. to act now with Iraq. Hitler didn't have WMD either, and he's gone too. Should we try to bring the Nazi's back because they didn't have WMD? It is difficult for me to fathom the illogic in gworld's "arguments."
Yes but gworld is fun anyway! hrblcantra is completely different, although I don't share his views most of the time, he is rather more reasonable, balanced and well mannered than gworld... WMD, WMD, WMD, what else can he say? And even then, I am sure that they are going to show up somewhere sometime. Saddam won't, so target number 1, HIT! WMD, target number 1643875, oh dear, we missed! Right, so who would put his house on WMD not showing up? I love your point about bringing back the Nazi's because they didn't find any!
So? I do not recall him or anyone in his administration every denying that there was flawed intelligence. At this point, what difference does it make? Who cares?
Great point. Especially given the fact that 95% of the US did not want to enter WWII. After all, why should we have even attacked Hitler and Germany? Hell, they DID NOT attack us. Direct from a liberal nut case protest sign circa 1941. "Hitler did not attack us, why attack Hitler?" Amazing how it takes years of "REVIEWING" (not re-writting) history to realize the decisions a president made were often times (while they did not seem like the right ones) were the right ones where as the US was concerned.
I hate to say it but trying to compare attacking hitler, WWII especially after pearl harbour is realy an extremely far fetched attempt. There is no logical common sense comparison to the two sides.................................