So... we know that Dick Cheney's daughter is a lesbian. What do you think? Is Karl Rove a homsexual? Is Condolezza Rice a lesbian? And what about that ferret77 guy?
Which becomes the mass sum of the whole argument, rendering the original position virtually lost in the plethora of posts.
So it's hardline or no line. Sorry even if I'm on one persons side but I do not agree with one thing I don't just start believing it for my benefit. By me asking questions of those for something, even if I agree with the topic. It can also help me be for it more if it can be explained enough. I like to make up my own mind and not be a drone, thank you very much
Makes me none difference. I have no problems with gays. Though I'd feel awkward having to explain to a child why two bushy dudes were making out in the food court at the mall.
Well since you keep bringing it up I thought you needed it explained again, must be the old age setting in early. runs and ducks, just messing with ya.
If you go to England and bomb a place, is it hdgedup that bombed a building or USA attacked England? Do you think England should attack USA because it is possible that you go to England and bomb a building, even USA is no threat to England right now? The fact is that Iran is no threat to USA from the military stand point and doesn't matter how many crazy stories you make up or mush room clouds you fantasies about is going to change this fact.
Nah, I understand it quite well Though I'm feeling the residual effects of my fibercon tabs starting to kick in at the momemt. I know, same here
That does depend however if the government supported hodge or not. It does work but not in all cases.
Wasn't it muslim terrorists, one of which drove a brand new Mercedes Benz? Oh wait, I know, it's a trick question! It's George Bush's fault! Do I get a gold star now?
If the govenment trained me and gave me the material and then made me fly all the way over there on coach. I mean how long is that flight? They couldn't give me a first class ticket. Come on. Anway I finally get there and I'm all pissed off becauase I've been cramped in a plane forever and I get the material to put the bomb together and I bomb something in the name of the US and fly back to the US (in coach again). So the US shouldn't be held responsible at all? What if they send me over there ever 10 days or so? England should just put up posters for me? They shouldn't take any action? What if the US makes a gold star system and they are sending 1,000 of us over there, and whoever kills the most people each week gets and ice cream party?
Nice little story, any proof that Iranian have done any of these things? I thought the discussion was about Iran as a country and it's military capacities but since you have nothing to say about that, you start fantasizing about may be some one will come on commercial airline to USA, carrying a nuclear bomb in his luggage. Since you are so good about these fantasies, what do you think such a person will write on his visa application, business or tourist? Do you think he will declare it in custom? after all the value is more than $10,000, so it will be illegal not to declare it? Do you have any proof that Iranian have been involved in terrorist attacks against USA? Last time I checked, 9/11 was done by Talibans, Al queda and Saudis and while Talibans and Al queda were previously supported by USA and Saudis are still this administration friends, Iranian were supporting the Taliban's opposition in Afghanistan.
Did I say Iran has done any of that? You said they pose absolutely no threat to the US. Your statement was so ludicrous I thought I'd give a ludicrous example. Yeah several years ago no one thought that a group with no navy and no long-range missiles could really hurt the US. I guess slamming planes into buildings kind of showed us that there are more ways of attacking a country than a navy and long-range missiles. If you're wondering why I sometimes respond to your stupid posts with jokes is because I think of you as a joke. Your posts have no merit and lack intelligence.
Let's summarize your position to see who is a joke. 1- You have agreed that Iran has no military capability to attack USA. 2- You have agree that Iran has not been involved in any terrorism actions against USA. From the above 2 facts, you have drawn the following assumption and course of action: You assumed that Iran will be danger some times in future and USA should invade Iran. This logic can only be reasonable for a moron like you.
You are joking right? Cause that will help but is not an end-all solution. Plus if you can make a lock, someone can pick it.
When did I saw Iran has no military? I was saying you said they have no navy and no long-range missiles. When did I say the US should invade Iran? I never said Iran has or hasn't been involved in terrorist activity against the US. Are you a complete idiot or just have horrible reading comprehension skills? Looks like you’re still the joke. Thanks for playing.
The fact is that the Iranians are working hard to develop nuclear weapons so that they can be a serious threat to civilian populations in Israel and the United States. Why are you calling the President of Iran a liar? Isn't he your friend?
Show us how Iranian military is any danger to US security. Show us how Iranian have been involved in any terrorist actions against USA On the other hand if we are talking about exploding airplanes and killing innocent civilians then you can look at this: 290 - 3 July 1988; Iranair A300; Persian Gulf, near Straits of Hormuz: Aircraft was shot down by a surface to air missile from the American naval vessel U.S.S. Vincennes. All 16 crew and 274 passengers were killed. A300 fatal passenger events http://www.airsafe.com/events/mostfat.htm It seems so far it is Americans who are killing Iranian civilians and not the other way around.