The judge said in the execution of one person he's doing God's work. I never said anything about multiple issues. I was talking about your argument, but I'll try to make it real easy for you to understand everything next time. I like how you just breeze over the stuff you can't refute. Nice. Are you even a US citizen?
Inform others of what? Paroled nine times. What do you want to do, give him a second chance? Oh, wait, that was 8 paroles earlier wasn't it? I'm always left wondering what mental disease rationalizes the defense of the worst scum society has to offer. I'm never left disappointed that someone will take on the role.
Do you know how to read? I never talked about that person, I was talking about the Judge in the case as a single example. I'm trying to inform others of the injustices going on in Texas and the rest of our justice system as a whole. Just because sometimes they are right, doesn't mean they aren't often wrong.
I knew that my posting about insurgency and small wars would be too complicated for former corporal used to working in the kitchen. There are a lot of good resources about this subjects on the Internet. May be you can try to look at some factual sites like US Marines instead of wasting all your time on Fox news and other hate groups sites, so you can learn about subject of small wars and how it should be dealt with.
I know he was a judge that involved religion and god in his work, and involved in a death penalty case That is the only thing relevant to this discussion. It doesn't matter what crime(s) the person involved in the case committed, the fact remains this judge is using god and religion as part of his work in the justice system.
Oh, the outrage! OMG, the injustices. Let's see...I live in Texas, I choose not to kill others, to follow the law (except those pesky inspection stickers...always get stopped every year because I forget). I don't rob Walmarts, I don't kill cops, I don't rape women, I don't abduct and molest little kids. But if I did any of those things, I know what the consequence would be, right? I "might" only go to prison for a few years, if I have a Judge who is sympathetic to my kind. I "might" serve life in prison. I "might" be executed. Hmm, let's see. I think knowing that those things are wrong and that they have consequences that are very well known, I will choose not to do those things. But I should feel sorry for someone who does? I should make excuses for murderers and child molesters? I think not.
Gtech are you pretending that 100 people who were convicted and sentenced to death have been PROVEN INNOCENT never happened??
Not a bad word to spare for head choppers Just to correct the record though, my last rank as an Army Recruiter was Sergeant. Since you only pretend to know about the military, you wouldn't know that only the top ten percent of MOS' are selected for this duty. You also wouldn't know that you must be at least a Sergeant to perform in this duty. Nor would you know what MOS 13b was. Oh, and you wouldn't know what MOS is either. It's Military Occupational Skill.
I could shoot you in the head and say "I'm doing al qaeda's work". I could just have said it for the irony, I could have said it because I thought it was the right thing to say. Does that make me an al qaeda terrrorist?
If I understand your position correctly, we should never do anything to anyone because *someone* might could be potentially innocent. Therefore, no laws should apply to anyone. I'd say 1% is exceptionally low. Assuming it was even correct.
Either way, if you did it and said you were doing al qaida's work, you'd get sympathy from gworld. Probably a few others as well.
Maybe I just value the individual human life more than you. 118 lives that were sentenced to death is not "exceptionally low" and is not acceptable. Considering at the VERY least 1% have been found innocent after being sentenced to death, how many have been actually executed that were innocent? Could you look into a childs, a mothers, a wives eyes and tell them their innocent loved one was executed by our justice system but that is "acceptable" since it only happens 1% of the time? Edit: When does it become unacceptable? 5% , 10% ?? How many innocent people must die before we stop the problem? Executions Since 1976: 986. At a rate of 1% thats 10 innocent lives executed. At a rate of 2% thats 20 innocent lives executed. At a rate of 5% thats 50 innocent lives executed. At a rate of 10% thats 99 innocent lives executed. So i ask again, at what level does it become more than "exceptionally low" and unacceptable to you?
You know what, I despise comments like these. I was going to post a lot more but I realize you are not worth acknowledging saying stuff like that. Why don't you give us some better solutions instead of being a fucking asshole trying to make others feel guilty for doing their best to make society safer. Come up with your own plans and suggestions. All you ever do here is roll your eyes and pretent to know all the answers. Please tell us how you would run our country if you were in charge. I'd like to forward your suggestion to my local congress man who seems to be struggling without having a great advisor like you.
I'm giving a solution: STOP EXECUTING PEOPLE. Dickhead. I'm not the one making excuses like "exceptionally low" "collateral damage", etc when innocent people are murdered every single day all over the world. I'm not the one supporting we rush of to war where we all know many innocent people are going to be killed. I'm not the one saying "put em in the electric chair" when they're found guilty by a racist jury or had $5,000 public defender. We should be avoiding killing innocent people AT ALL COSTS. You know why? Because nothing is more valuable than a life. After you take it, you can never give it back. So when is taking an innocent persons life acceptable to you?
Hahaahahahaha... that made me laugh so hard popcorn came out my nose. Unfortunately for you Hodgedup, I have been listening to gworld. gworld has explained to me that nothing is ever my fault and that personal responsibility is a sham perpetrated by Christian terrorists. Therefore, I am suing you for SIX BILLION DOLLARS for pain and suffering. But don't worry, gworld assures me that your insurance company has the money.
It seems exceptionally clear that you value the lives of murderers more than the reasonable people in this conversation do. It seems equally clear that the more sane people in this conversation value the lives of the innocent victims of these murderers more than you do.