I wonder which one is worse, thief or psychopath? Again the question: Do you condemn mass murder and genocide or do you support it? Don't be shy, tell us how you dream about having bloods of women and children on your hand.
Moral equivalence with yourself? Which label fits you best? Do you often steal other's bandwidth and the hard work of others without giving them credit? Are those the qualities you admire most about yourself? Until you correct your post, I'm not going to condemn anything. Virtually every post you've made in your ten page anti-Christian rant (free, as usual of anything towards terrorists) is copied/pasted from anti-Christian sites. I was trying to go back to whatever post you made bashing Christians that had the original content. Problem is, you spent so much energy bashing and when I came across another post I had missed, in which you (as usual) copied and pasted with no source, when I looked it up, it was again, from sites like "truthbeknown" and "exchristian." I can't take anything you post as serious. On most of what you listed and or fabricated for affect, I simply have no opinion, nor have I. Meaning of course, I would have to spend time researching facts from sites other than the anti-Christian sites you are stealing content from without giving credit, to form an opinion in the first place. For example, Rwanda...you try to make it out as if it were Christian related. Not surprising you would do that. But from what I found, a few priests/nuns were criticized by a human rights group for NOT DOING ENOUGH TO PREVENT. Exactly opposite of the the usual lunacy of liberals where they want Christians to simply lay down and die. From what I've read, there were none directly involved in killing. There were a few that were complacent, meaning they did nothing. My best guess there is, they were trying to prevent their own death. Who would you die for? http://www.globalpolicy.org/intljustice/tribunals/rwanda/2002/0512faith.htm Note, source provided. But you were not ready to give credit to three hundred that DID try to stand up, but were slain. You simply take issue with the few that didn't and tried to save their own lives. But overall, I was quite disappointed that not only our country, but others, did not intervene. It was tragic. As is the slaughter by muslims in Darfur that you never seem to bring up. Imagine that Iraq. Do I condemn? No, but I do feel sad that people have died. Saddam had a choice, he knew what would happen. He let his people down, but he had a history of doing that. I'm thankful we have the technology that prevented even more deaths. Had we used technology from previous wars of many years gone by, the death toll would be exponentially higher. It is a war. People die in wars and no country has devised a way to wage a war where that doesn't happen. Saddam had a choice and he made it. I note again, that you do not take issue with zarqawi killing Iraqis. 1000+ posts and never a word. Of course, that's not our (not your) mission there and we are fighting with and training Iraqis to take control of their country. Just because you want the US troops to pull out so terrorists can win, doesn't mean everyone does. So theres my comments on the last two. Your baited questions really didn't deserve that, but what the hell If you are looking for something to condemn, I suggest you can find a database of nearly three thousand incidents to condemn. Of course, I know you'll never mention them in a post here, or any other terrorist (that you are not defending), but there's always hope: http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/default.htm#attacks Just a small sampling, a mere week's worth, since you are in the mood for condemning
For me doesn't make a difference if the sick bastards think they are Muslims or Christians and their name is Hussein and Mohammad or Will and Gtech. Terrorists and Sadists are the same independent of what they call themselves. What part of the above sentence is unclear for you That I condemn all terrorist acts? As usual you are not telling the truth and I just need to quote from the same link that you provided to show what a psychopath you are: This what you wrote: For example, Rwanda...you try to make it out as if it were Christian related. Not surprising you would do that. But from what I found, a few priests/nuns were criticized by a human rights group for NOT DOING ENOUGH TO PREVENT. Exactly opposite of the the usual lunacy of liberals where they want Christians to simply lay down and die. From what I've read, there were none directly involved in killing. There were a few that were complacent, meaning they did nothing. and This is the text from your link: Five clergymen are to be tried in this East African town on charges that have shaken the trust of many Christians in the region. Their cases have drawn less attention than the turbulence over sexual abuse by priests in the United States and other countries. But the accusations in Arusha are more serious. The five men are accused of genocide. Three are Roman Catholic priests, one is a Seventh-day Adventist pastor, one an Anglican bishop. Prosecutors at the United Nations war crimes tribunal for Rwanda maintain that the five collaborated with killers in their congregations during the 1994 civil war, when more than 500,000 people were slain. ................... One is the Rev. Athanase Seromba, accused of helping to kill about 2,000 people who had taken refuge in his church, by ordering bulldozers to crush the building. Later, Father Seromba worked as a priest in Italy under an assumed name and then went into hiding after the tribunal tried to have him extradited. He surrendered in early February after international pressure was put on the Italian government and the Vatican. The second Catholic priest is the Rev. Hormisdas Nsengimana, who had been living under the protection of a monastery in Cameroon. Prosecutors charge him with playing a prominent role when a group of Hutus attacked and killed refugees in and around the Christ-Roi College, where he was rector. Both men were recently transferred to the United Nations jail in Arusha. ................. Critics have pointed to several Catholic and Protestant leaders who sided openly with the Hutu government in the months before it orchestrated the slaughter of Tutsi and moderate Hutu. Christian Terras, the author of "The Lost Honor of the Church," published in France, said many Hutus in the clergy had been aware of political meetings of extremist Hutus before the wave of killings, or had even attended them. "As many as 100 pastors, priests and nuns played an active role, siding with the Hutu militias," Mr. Terras said. ............. Genocide trials in local courts in Rwanda have already included church workers, and in 1998 two priests were sentenced to death. They remain in Rwandan jails, together with at least half a dozen other clergymen. In Belgium last year, two Rwandan nuns received long prison sentences after a local jury convicted them of crimes against humanity, finding them guilty of collaborating with murderous militia gangs. All my quotes are from your own link in the previous posting: http://www.globalpolicy.org/intljustice/tribunals/rwanda/2002/0512faith.htm Does your posting have any resemblance to what is written on the web site that you posted link to? May be expecting truth from psychopath is just too much? Do you even know what truth is when in your posting death sentence and long prison terms for crime against humanity changes to that they were criticized for not doing enough to prevent? I ask you again: Do you condemn mass murder, genocide and terrorism or do you support it?
I take no issue with your "every two hundred post clarification post that you are against all, but only bash Christians and Jews." It's clear why you MUST clarify that, isn't it? Never a bad word for a terrorist. Not one, in 1000+ posts. I think everyone knows why you suddenly come out and say "but, but, but I condemn all," and then go right back to bashing Christians and Jews again. Saying it every two hundred posts, in between your Christian and Jew bashing doesn't make it true. We all see who and what you support. The rest of your post is worthless. As I said, a few were complacent, most likely trying to save their own lives. Many more were slain, trying to save lives, yet you make no mention of that, do you? I've seen none that were directly killing others. My guess is, a few tried to save their own lives. Give up, or die. Looks like your buds are up to the same old things: http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/default.htm#attacks Notice the nice picture And now, things that make gworld happy, part II: Just a week's worth though, don't want to overload the server You have to go back to the early 1900s to find a few things to bash Christians with, when all you have to do to "condemn all" is look into last week. Very impressive indeed!
Wow lets get off the religion, it's obvious it's not going anywhere. I believe Gworld is simply trying to point out Christians have been guilty of mass murder in the past which I agree is the truth. Shall we leave it as both religions at least in history have been guilty of it, even if it was not the religion as a whole? Can't realy think of anything different at this moment but anyone have any feelings on the following link? http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9775689/
Thank you. On the funny side, I got the following red rep: "may you burn in a Christian hell" What an idiot? 1- I don't believe in God. 2- Even if there was a God, why should I burn in hell for condemning mass murder ? Who will go to Heaven, the priests that committed mass murder? Gtech, I still like to know your opinion: Do you condemn mass murder and genocide or do you support it?
How about a super slim and a wine cooler? Sounds more 'chearleaderish' j/k with ya zman, have that beer I plan on having one shortly.
Don't disagree both have had their times in history. And to that, I might add, let those that are guilty/convicted pay their debt to society, whatever it may be. I disagree that gworld is simply trying to point anything out. gworld is bashing and ONLY bashing Christians and Jews. You will never see him bash anything else. He will defend a terrorist and often has. That would be fine, unto itself, but he always has to reclarify his position that he's against all. I'm surprised you didn't see that.
May be the reason others don't see it is because they can read what I write and actually understand it instead of posting with sole purpose of hatred and intolerance like you do. "I am so tough, I am so tough that I am scared of myself. I have gun. Let's kill the enemies. All Muslim are enemies and want to kill us. The only solution is to kill all, let's smash the children head, rape the women and drink the blood of the men. Oh God, I am so tough when I post like this, I am The MAN." Sorry, that I don't post like the above, I leave it to you and Will for this kind of nonsense.
Not that I didn't see it but it never appeared to me in the thread that there was a question on muslim violence, instead being a question on other religions so of course the need to prove would only come to those religions in question. Maybe I read them wrong but that's what I got out of it
Nah! wine coolers are for pussies. Maybe gworld will join you on that one though. Now if you are up for cigars and beer let me know.
Don't worry about a red rep here or there - I think that someone does it randomly. I have recieved red rep on posts like that before, which makes no sense, I can see getting a red rep on a post that is polar.
yeah not worried about red rep, just thought it was a pretty dumb post for a red. ohwell, kind of funny in a way at the same time.