Another Proof Google Sucks:

Discussion in 'AdSense' started by qll, Sep 16, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. digitalpoint

    digitalpoint Overlord of no one Staff

    Messages:
    38,334
    Likes Received:
    2,613
    Best Answers:
    462
    Trophy Points:
    710
    Digital Goods:
    29
    #21
    Seriously dude, you should hang hook up with anthonycea, he has a website that I'm sure would post your articles.
     
    digitalpoint, Sep 17, 2004 IP
  2. chachi

    chachi The other Jason

    Messages:
    1,600
    Likes Received:
    57
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #22
    Ok now I am serious. Turn over the WMD, Georgie has been worried sick about them for months!
     
    chachi, Sep 17, 2004 IP
  3. minstrel

    minstrel Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    15,082
    Likes Received:
    1,243
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    480
    #23
    Now this part I have no difficulty at all believing. I wouldn't be surprised if there are large numbers of people lining up outside your door at this very moment wanting to tell you to shut up. :eek:
     
    minstrel, Sep 18, 2004 IP
  4. minstrel

    minstrel Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    15,082
    Likes Received:
    1,243
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    480
    #24
    Now don't be so modest, qll... I'm sure Imperial America isn't the only guilty party in this regard...
     
    minstrel, Sep 18, 2004 IP
  5. qll

    qll Peon

    Messages:
    195
    Likes Received:
    13
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #25
    Just let you know. I passed their Manual Review. Payment is approved. After the 10 hour review, they never came back, or at least I did not detect them.

    I told you that I did not do any dirty things.
     
    qll, Sep 19, 2004 IP
  6. minstrel

    minstrel Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    15,082
    Likes Received:
    1,243
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    480
    #26
    Glad to hear it. This might be a good time to reconsider that doorway pages scheme you're talking about in the other thread.
     
    minstrel, Sep 19, 2004 IP
  7. anthonycea

    anthonycea Banned

    Messages:
    13,378
    Likes Received:
    342
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #27
    Sorry Shawn, we only publish research that is based in fact.
     
    anthonycea, Oct 3, 2004 IP
  8. anthonycea

    anthonycea Banned

    Messages:
    13,378
    Likes Received:
    342
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #28

    Sorry Shawn, I am the only comedy writer on my sites :D

    You guy's let me down, someone should have PM me on this, I could have got a good laugh out of this guy.... :D

    Plus Shawn's response...LOL :D
     
    anthonycea, Oct 3, 2004 IP
  9. calvin_ngan

    calvin_ngan Peon

    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #29
    While other tips correctly say "don't encourage your readers to click your ads" that is not exactly correct. You do want to encourage them; you just don't want to say so. Let me explain.
     
    calvin_ngan, Oct 6, 2004 IP
  10. minstrel

    minstrel Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    15,082
    Likes Received:
    1,243
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    480
    #30
    We're all ears...
     
    minstrel, Oct 6, 2004 IP
  11. hightide13

    hightide13 Peon

    Messages:
    127
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #31
    Must be like the Southern phrase "I tell you what..."

    You usually don't really have anything to say after you say that. Here, I will explain... :p
     
    hightide13, Oct 12, 2004 IP
    minstrel likes this.
  12. sarahk

    sarahk iTamer Staff

    Messages:
    28,808
    Likes Received:
    4,534
    Best Answers:
    123
    Trophy Points:
    665
    #32
    What's the url for this fascinating page. I'd be interested to see if I'm smarter than a Google Tech.

    Sarah
     
    sarahk, Oct 12, 2004 IP
  13. anthonycea

    anthonycea Banned

    Messages:
    13,378
    Likes Received:
    342
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #33
    Sarahk

    Shawn does not have his comedy union card, please let him know that unless he pays his dues to the DP comics union, that he should not use my name or likeness in any of his posts.

    Since I am working offline full time please PM him for me and collect the dues :D
     
    anthonycea, Oct 13, 2004 IP
  14. sarahk

    sarahk iTamer Staff

    Messages:
    28,808
    Likes Received:
    4,534
    Best Answers:
    123
    Trophy Points:
    665
    #34
    And I'm his keeper? Wouldn't mind, he's kinda cute, just way, way too young :)
     
    sarahk, Oct 13, 2004 IP
  15. anthonycea

    anthonycea Banned

    Messages:
    13,378
    Likes Received:
    342
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #35
    Right, but you have not seen him without that snowboarding cap on :eek:

    It does not matter if he is cute or not Sarah, you are married, should I e-mail your husband? :rolleyes:
     
    anthonycea, Oct 13, 2004 IP
  16. sarahk

    sarahk iTamer Staff

    Messages:
    28,808
    Likes Received:
    4,534
    Best Answers:
    123
    Trophy Points:
    665
    #36
    You're showing your age Anthony! I can't stand those hats!

    ooh blackmail! I think the vast expanse of the Pacific Ocean will ensure that I don't step out of line...;)

    And I thought all Americans were liberated swingers. According to the mass media produced to represent YOUR culture you are anyway...
     
    sarahk, Oct 13, 2004 IP
  17. anthonycea

    anthonycea Banned

    Messages:
    13,378
    Likes Received:
    342
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #37
    Well if you don't like the stocking cap, tell Shawn to provide you with a photo without the cap on.

    Even if I did e-mail the old man, he knows you are the boss in the family, what could he do anyway Sarah?

    Since you are so brilliant, I bet he would not dare to argue with you, I gave up a long time ago :mad:
     
    anthonycea, Oct 13, 2004 IP
  18. NewComputer

    NewComputer Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,021
    Likes Received:
    68
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    188
    #38
    Ok, so now that the dating game is over with, can anyone tell me what in the world QLL was talking about? Is this guy Saddam's little brother or what. He turned a "Google hacked my system" thread into a WMD thread and now it transformed into a dating game thread (pretty sure Shawn is taken AC).

    Anyways, if G is 'checking you out' they must have reason. I have never seen them looking in on me, because there is no reason.
     
    NewComputer, Oct 13, 2004 IP
  19. sarahk

    sarahk iTamer Staff

    Messages:
    28,808
    Likes Received:
    4,534
    Best Answers:
    123
    Trophy Points:
    665
    #39
    Like most people Shawn's real appeal is between his ears, not the packaging.

    Anthony, you flatterer! We've never even had a squabble. I just see your name and have to smile :)

    Back to the thread...

    QLL: do we get to see this infamous page or not?
     
    sarahk, Oct 13, 2004 IP
  20. anthonycea

    anthonycea Banned

    Messages:
    13,378
    Likes Received:
    342
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #40
    No one cares about qll NC, that is the most boring subject in the world :rolleyes:

    All this PRbot crap, qll crap and the "class action lawsuit kid" stuff really is boring.

    Why do you keep that crap alive NC?

    I don't read no "qll crap" or "PRbot crap" and have now given up on the "class action lawsuit kid crap".

    Why don't you start a thread called "PRbot, qll and class action kid hype" and then you guys can talk about all 3 of these cats in one thread and just focus on these guy's non-stop.

    I am sure it would be a great thread for everyone that likes to waste a lot of time.

    Just think of all the hits you will get on that one NC???? :rolleyes:
     
    anthonycea, Oct 13, 2004 IP
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.