Another Big Zap From Google

Discussion in 'Co-op Advertising Network' started by lowrider14044, Feb 4, 2005.

0
Page 2 of 2
  1. flawebworks

    flawebworks Tech Services

    Messages:
    991
    Likes Received:
    36
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    78
    #21
    Can someone explain to me what this means:

    What's LSI and IDF?
     
    flawebworks, Feb 4, 2005 IP
  2. lowrider14044

    lowrider14044 Raider

    Messages:
    260
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #22
    By doing a "companion" site, won't that be considered duplicate content? How will the visitors find the companion site to go to the real site? Forgive me if I'm dense but as I told you before, I'm not a programer or wiz at this stuff. :)
     
    lowrider14044, Feb 4, 2005 IP
  3. digitalpoint

    digitalpoint Overlord of no one Staff

    Messages:
    38,334
    Likes Received:
    2,613
    Best Answers:
    462
    Trophy Points:
    710
    Digital Goods:
    29
    #23
    Latent Semantic Indexing and Inverse Document Frequency

    A basic example is Google's understanding that a "zoo" is connected to things like Aquarium, Wild Animal Park and Wildlife. Or that "Apple" is connected to QuickTime, Computers, Mac, Windows, etc.

    Notice the words that get highlighted within the snippets in the results:

    http://www.google.com/search?q=~zoo

    http://www.google.com/search?q=~apple
     
    digitalpoint, Feb 4, 2005 IP
  4. lowrider14044

    lowrider14044 Raider

    Messages:
    260
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #24
    Interesting that Google puts Microsoft second right after apple? :rolleyes:
     
    lowrider14044, Feb 4, 2005 IP
  5. mopacfan

    mopacfan Peon

    Messages:
    3,273
    Likes Received:
    164
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #25
    with the companion site, since the main site is hosed as far as rankings are concerned by what I percieve to be a penalty. The new site should be able to take over the rankings and get back up where the old site was. Then people find the companion site, and from there, will move to the real site. Even if they dont, the content will still be there, just not all prettied up.
     
    mopacfan, Feb 4, 2005 IP
  6. flawebworks

    flawebworks Tech Services

    Messages:
    991
    Likes Received:
    36
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    78
    #26
    I asked my question to soon.

    So I tried:

    ~affordable keyword keyword

    What came up in results was

    Cheap keyword keyword. (this also came up when I tried ~cheap keyword keyword)

    So if I'm reading this correctly; then you anchor text with affordable keyword keyword and replace affordable with cheap in the text?

    Man.
     
    flawebworks, Feb 4, 2005 IP
  7. digitalpoint

    digitalpoint Overlord of no one Staff

    Messages:
    38,334
    Likes Received:
    2,613
    Best Answers:
    462
    Trophy Points:
    710
    Digital Goods:
    29
    #27
    {shrug} As far as SEO goes, who knows... only Google. Google is just trying to algorithmically "understand" pages, rather than focus on keywords.
     
    digitalpoint, Feb 4, 2005 IP
  8. flawebworks

    flawebworks Tech Services

    Messages:
    991
    Likes Received:
    36
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    78
    #28
    Time to break out the thesaurus. I'm not done reading the sew article yet; but it seems like the theming that's always being talked about isn't going to be as strict as it might have been...

    Man....
     
    flawebworks, Feb 4, 2005 IP
  9. Refrozen

    Refrozen Peon

    Messages:
    318
    Likes Received:
    9
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #29
    I got an idea! Lets all point all of our weight at the same keyword on some random page on the itnernet. If it gets de-indexed, we know how to kill all the spam sites, all the spyware/adware/shitware sites, and everything illegal, we are the magic bullet, we are. :D
     
    Refrozen, Feb 4, 2005 IP
Page 2 of 2