Angela's Links Really Don't Work

I am not an expert on this, but It would seem that way. All of the best guys in pr's are saying the same thing. There is wisdom with it that need listening to.

 

Yes I tried a link wheel for SEO Company los angeles
for domain http://optawise.com

did nothing for me, in fact it moved it back a few

 

I find it hilarious how many ignorant and ridiculous some people are regarding backlinks...hey that is fine with me..leaves more backlinks for me to move my site to the first page...in fact I have numerous keywords on page one..but please if you have any kind of evidence to back up your ridiculous claims please provide it..I am providing mine right here...look forward to your evidence and proof!


You may have heard from people who do not have complete
knowledge about Search Engine algorithms that leaving your
link on an “inner page” that is new or has a low or 0 Page Rank
inside of a high Page Rank domain will do your site no good.
This is a fallacy.
To show that the above statement is false, just do a search in
Google for the word backlinks without quotes. You will see an
article written by me, Angela V. Edwards, on the GoArticles
article directory. I have only used backlinks on inner pages of
high Page Rank authority sites for this article. My article
currently holds the NUMBER TWO position in Google out of
more than million completing sites, just below Wikipedia. I have
done this by using the inner pages of high ranking websites.
You can also do a search for the keyword Angela. You will
find my site in the number two spot out of more than 80
million competing sites. I also only used these "inner page"
backlinks for that webpage as well.


Matt Cutts, an engineer for Google who acts as Google's Public
Relations contact person was asked about the above
statement but he couldn’t give a straight answer due to the
question being too close to Google’s algorithm. You will find
part of the interview below.
Stephan Spencer: OK. So, I guess, a follow on to
that would be: a .edu and .gov link, and so forth, has,
typically, a more pristine link neighborhood, so it is
not just about the PageRank, right? The link
neighborhood comes into play.
Matt Cutts: That is a little bit of a "secret sauce"
question, so I am not going to go into how much we
do trust that sort of stuff.
Stephan Spencer: OK. I am going to slap my wrist
now. Ouch, ouch!
Matt Cutts: [laughing]
You can see the entire interview here:
http://www.stephanspencer.com/search-engines/matt-cutts-interview

 

Horrible bit of misdirection there.

Here's that SERP
http://www.google.com/search?q=back...s=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

Here's the page she's talking about....
http://www.goarticles.com/cgi-bin/showa.cgi?C=1151743

Here's the backlinks that count toward that page's pagerank...
http://www.google.com/search?q=link...s=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

Here's the backlinks in that list that have HIGH PR...
PR3 www.inthesetimes.com/community/profile/9508/
PR2 forums.theeca.com/member.php?u=2286
PR4 action.publicbroadcasting.net/kqed/posts/list/1806213.page
PR3 http://blog.xilinus.com/2008/12/13/protofx-a-new-effect-engine-for-prototype
PR5 http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/04/obama_dissing_chicago_deep-dish.php

These backlinks are the reason this page ranks so well, not the hundreds of worthess pr0 profile pages she's selling you links on.

Of course it's not just about pagerank. It's also about on page optimization. It's also about getting links from authoritative, relevant sites. But that's not what Angela is selling you. But 1 single link form the quality PR3 site is worth more than 2000 of your inner page pr0 on any site.

 

Well, that's what the experts on here are saying. Not only here but also in other authority forums. You can search google, you will not miss it.

 

I could probably get the same results as Angela doing blog commenting

 

As everyone knows, you need quality not quantity

 

Hmm...still no evidence or proof from anyone?...anyone?..hello?..is anyone gonna provide some hard concrete evidence or are they just going to spout crap all over this thread about how they "think" they know anything...I will keep waiting..please show me something!..anything! proof!

 

If you go through life believing everything you hear until someone disproves it to you, you are sure to called a 'sucker'. You've got to be able to think more critically, especially when presented with something that sounds 'too good to be true'.

I provided all the proof you should need to have serious misgivings about what Angela told you.

 

First off I am not going by anyhting dilusional!

I am actually using it and I see the results. All you keep saying is that is has been proven time and time again and using 2006 as a base. who was this proven by and do they have a case study? When was the last time you proved it? I mean come on, look how many people still bash SE nuke because of the first 6 months or so. SE NUke is a powerful tool to have in your SEO arsenal.

Say what you want, but I am going to continue to recommend high page rank that automates the backlink process for Angela's links, becuase it works.

 

I agree with this. I have used it for 3 months now, i really cant see any difference in my rankings. maybe 1 or 2 spots higher and the next day again 1 or 2 sport lower...

I am not going to say its not working, but i really cant see the benifit.

 

I had to take about 20 minutes of pulling myself off of the floor after heraring that. (i was laughing so hard)

Besides the whole nothing works except painful slow link building bit. And If I build too many links the big G will ban me. Can I assume that I could start building too many links for all my competitors to get them banned and I can rule the Big G?

Please enlighten us.

 

I had to take about 20 minutes of pulling myself off of the floor after heraring that. (i was laughing so hard)

Besides the whole nothing works except painful slow link building bit. And If I build too many links the big G will ban me. Can I assume that I could start building too many links for all my competitors to get them banned and I can rule the Big G?

Please enlighten us.

 

I'm not sure where you're getting that from. There are plenty of things that work, but very, very few shortcuts.

As far as the number of backlinks you acquire, I don't think there's any limit of quality backlinks you can acquire before Google or anyone bans you. The problems comes about when Google detects that you are using 'automated submission' software to acquire them.

 

i think you have to request back your money if you sure that it is not working
and find another

 

Hundreds of people are posting the same links on the same sites. Do you think Google is too stupid to not recognize this link pattern?

 

yeah im not using it anymore....too much work for little return...

 

so if nothing works how you get to the top of google?

well i do a little bit of everything not only profiles and not only link wheels and not only forum posting. i think that in the end everything count, everything help a little bit

 

Who said nothing works? There are LOTs of things that work. There's just not very many shortcuts. Bulk submission/spam programs will jsut get you into trouble.

What you want is do-follow links on relevant, quality, preferably unique pages with good PR. Angela's doesn't offer this. Angela's offer's do-follow links on PR0 profile pages on unrelated social bookmarking sites and forums. They are practically worthless. Link wheels offer multiple way links on unrelated social bookmarking sites and forums. They are practically worthless as well.

Any links that these two systems offer that are on pages with PR would be beneficial, but the next one I see would be the first. And its far better to get links on related, quality, unique sites anyhow, not just social bookmarking sites and random forums.

 

I was doing this between 2001 - 2002 with a custom software. It was working perfect at that time. However there are a LOT better methods now