Anchor PageRank theory

Discussion in 'Google' started by Romek, Feb 3, 2009.

  1. #1
    One of Polish SEO experts published few years ago exciting AnchorPR theory. According to he, Google gives every sites Anchor PageRank, for example when many sites links to site X and this links hawe word "y" as an anchor text, so site X will have high AnchorPR for word "y", and link with anchor text "y" to other site "Z" from site X gives site "Z" more power and site "Z" will also be higher in Google ranking for word "y". My English is not well, so I don't know how to tell this theory more clearly, but I suppose you will understand it. This theory is used by Polish SEO experts in practice and according to many SEO experiments it realy works well and thanks to this knowledge they have top places in Google's rankings! Does anybody knows any American equivalent to this theory, or it is known only in Poland?
     
    Romek, Feb 3, 2009 IP
  2. vansterdam

    vansterdam Notable Member

    Messages:
    3,145
    Likes Received:
    120
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    245
    #2
    The whole xyz thing is a bit confusing, but I understand what you mean. I wouldn't say this theory is only known in Poland. Most seo's know this basic principal, but I guess few have written any theories about it. It is well known that if you gets links with your keywords as link anchor text, those links will give an extra boost to the rankings for that keyword phrase. A lot of people also know that it helps to get links from relevant webpages.
     
    vansterdam, Feb 3, 2009 IP
  3. Romek

    Romek Member

    Messages:
    83
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    45
    #3
    [​IMG]

    I've made a schema of sample use of this theory in practice (shown on image above). As you see, sites of SEO background collects many links with sample anchor "Apples" or "Plums" or "Pears", thanks to it 1st background site has high AnchorPR for word "Apples" etc. When this background sites has high AnchorPR, they links to main, real site, which we promote. This links are very strong and thanks to it main promoted site in short time quickly goes up in Google rankings!
     
    Romek, Feb 3, 2009 IP
  4. evolveforever

    evolveforever Peon

    Messages:
    1,286
    Likes Received:
    15
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    interesting.thanks for the info.
     
    evolveforever, Feb 3, 2009 IP
  5. bollywoodgeeks

    bollywoodgeeks Peon

    Messages:
    275
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    cool post dude.. thanks!
     
    bollywoodgeeks, Feb 3, 2009 IP
  6. sumit1710

    sumit1710 Peon

    Messages:
    648
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    The image explains all but i suppose this is very obvious. Adding title text would be icing on cake
     
    sumit1710, Feb 3, 2009 IP
  7. idolism

    idolism Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    212
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    108
    #7
    I have the same theory.
     
    idolism, Feb 3, 2009 IP
  8. Mudfoot

    Mudfoot Banned

    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #8
    If this were true, that means that if you get just one link on a PR7 site, you probably can get blessed more by google. Maybe I am missing something. And the one site you got the link on did all the work.
     
    Mudfoot, Feb 3, 2009 IP
  9. idolism

    idolism Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    212
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    108
    #9
    Let's explain it like this:
    The DNA (PageRank), keeps the information of the GENE (keyword).

    Is it easy understandable?
     
    idolism, Feb 3, 2009 IP
  10. SEO_WatchDog

    SEO_WatchDog Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,148
    Likes Received:
    15
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    115
    #10
    The idea itself is clear but what PR has to do with it? Page Rank and relevance and not quite so interrelated...
     
    SEO_WatchDog, Feb 4, 2009 IP
  11. SEOibiza

    SEOibiza Peon

    Messages:
    1,197
    Likes Received:
    43
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #11
    i would say this is close to how it works. you dont need to do it at site level though, individual pages work the same.

    if a page ranks for a term then a link from it using that term is likely a google relevant link? several of those would usually rank the target site very well.
     
    SEOibiza, Feb 4, 2009 IP
  12. alltheweb1985

    alltheweb1985 Peon

    Messages:
    60
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #12
    I agree with SEO_WatchDog, the idea itself is clear and I totally support it (I've seen this concept work quite well with my sites' SEO).

    But what does PR have to do with it?
     
    alltheweb1985, Feb 4, 2009 IP
  13. Romek

    Romek Member

    Messages:
    83
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    45
    #13
    PageRank has nothing to do with it. It calls "Anchor PR" - this term is originaly used by Polish SEO expert, who as a first described this theory few years ago.
     
    Romek, Feb 4, 2009 IP
  14. giancarlo

    giancarlo Active Member

    Messages:
    697
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    58
    #14
    It works the other way arround: the main site should link to other sites, on which the anchor text "apples" (for example) should be displayed. This way the main site will go up in SERPs for that keyword (apples).

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PageRank
     
    giancarlo, Feb 4, 2009 IP
  15. Mudfoot

    Mudfoot Banned

    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #15
    I understand what your trying to say.

    I am not quite sure about the theory then. If that were the case would not all the top sites for a specific keyword have a like-PR?
     
    Mudfoot, Feb 4, 2009 IP
  16. Mudfoot

    Mudfoot Banned

    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #16
    This makes more sense to me.
     
    Mudfoot, Feb 4, 2009 IP
  17. Riyaad15

    Riyaad15 Peon

    Messages:
    49
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #17
    Great post.
     
    Riyaad15, Feb 4, 2009 IP
  18. LinkMasterFlash

    LinkMasterFlash Guest

    Messages:
    115
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #18
    Great post..... but dont forget about the Polish firing squad...... they all stood in a circle

    Also... dont forget about the Polish guy who threw the hand grenade..... the guy pulled the pin and threw it back!!!
     
    LinkMasterFlash, Feb 4, 2009 IP
  19. lindamood1

    lindamood1 Active Member

    Messages:
    1,705
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    78
    #19
    this is key seo techniques u have disclosed, thanks
     
    lindamood1, Feb 4, 2009 IP
  20. Romek

    Romek Member

    Messages:
    83
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    45
    #20
    Have anybody done any experiments and have got additional proofs for this theory?
     
    Romek, Mar 22, 2009 IP