That is so true. If America had a President that actually cared for it's people instead of a corrupt scumbag Bush or Clinton who knows what might happen. No more bullshit "wars" and false flag terrorist attacks for a start.
I was thinking of someone, grim. Who could it be? Who has a low self esteem and always takes the popular side of any argument to boost his ego? It would have to be someone, who took two sides of every issue...even two sides of a hooker issue. Someone who claims that he needs to ask questions to get the full story, on issues that pertain to his country, or might be favorable to Bush, but is completely opposite when it comes to what he supports. A free thinker...one who has agenda, but always claim he doesn't. It's on the tip of my tongue too. Dang, can you help me out, bud?
I love it when RP supporters spend countless hours trying to prove this is what they are not about (kooky conspiracies) and then AGS comes along and undoes it all in one fell swoop
Who is the guy who constantly gets owned time and time again, lies and makes up his own little fantasy world to try to escape that fact? Ohyeah it's who I am responding to. Low self esteem. LOL you seriously have no idea who the fuxx I am do you? Low self esteem, you are simply delusional. 2 sides you can NEVER point out. The same mantra you've been chanting as an excuse when you got owned, the same mantra you never can show, the same mantra even your cheerleaders didn't agree with you on. 2 sides of a hooker issue, really? The only side of the hooker was your tiny little, yeah I'll leave it at that. Seriously Gtech is this the best you are capable of? No Gtech I want the full story to make an informed decision and not follow blindly like you. So that I do not blindly support a war based on lies, you know like you did! I have also supported Bush when I feel he is correct, but yeah do some more lying why don't you. An agenda, and what would that agenda be? I'm open on issues, unlike you. I am only closed on one thing, the US constitution. Popular side, yet again I was anti war when it was anything but popular, anti gays having children which is not popular, more pro gun than even you which is definitely not popular, I question both sides which is not popular. Come to think of it I don't think I've ever noticed you question one of your cheerleaders posts... Pathetic Gtech, simply pathetic.
Oh boy, here we go again. With all the delusion and denial, multiple positions on everything, yet still denying he's not man enough to demand the same thing for HIS candidate that he is supporting in this and other threads. Grim, you demand answers from Huckabee as a diversionary tactic to cover for the man you are supporting regarding his massive support from anti-semites, neo nazis, troofers, conspiracy nuts, anarchists and others. But you make no such demands for your candidate. Instead, while supporting him, you do the usual and say you are not supporting him. Clearly you do not support Huckabee either (or did you plant an opposing position to counter that too? I can never keep up with all your positions). So you demand questions for success in Iraq, for anything positive for your country, for other candidates, but you won't demand such for the candidate you support but claim you don't support? Once again, hypocrisy! You make it so easy and you are so consistent on it. One standard for everyone else, another standard for your agenda/candidate. Keep up the deflection. I always enjoy how you try to skirt around issues. Here's what will happen: To cover your own dishonesty and hypocrisy, you'll start calling me a liar. You'll start projecting heavily, accusing me of the things you are actually doing. A few more name calling sessions, some more denial, some projectionism with a big ol' healthy side dish of narcissism. Finally, I'll get bored with your dishonesty and hypocrisy again and give you the last word. Because you've proven time and again, if you give a narcissist the last word, they will shut up. But they will never demand answers from their candidate, while demanding such from others, their country, or Iraq. Oh, my bumpy poobah, testify!
I see the second grade is in fact way too advanced for you Is that all you can do is lie and twist Gtech. Your post above is nothing but one big fat lie. I for one am glad Gtech world does not have nuclear weapons! You are the one using deflection to skirt around issues and have the nerve to try to twist it the other way. You simply are yet again pathetic GTech, all you know is lies and you actually believe them! You rip on RP for his supporters, lol well huckabee has you as a supporter what does that make him?!
Yep you being owned yet again. The only denial and delusion is on your end of things Gtech. Multiple positions, your same lie filled mantra you have been spouting for years, but never able to prove it. Is this trully the best you can do? PATHETIC! Yet again not my candidate, he could very well become my candidate, I have not yet put my support behind him as I strongly question his Iraq policy. Keep up those lies there Gtech. I do not support him Gtech, I throw away shit, you know your posts If I read you posting shit against Obama I'd question it, if I saw you posting shit against Bush even I'd question it. You however only post shit about RP, doesn't take much logic to see it's you who continues to post about RP, I am only cleaning up the shit.. Yet more lies. Ok Gtech I'm squeezing that itty bitty hand of yours real tightly here. I DO NOT demand answers of Huckabee, read the damn posts, read the damn thread I called you on being a hypocrite and you were proven to be one! Talk about 'diversionary' that would be you trying to claim I am demanding anything of Huckabee, when in fact I WAS NOT I was showing the world the hypocrite that is Gtech. Again another lie, I do not yet support him. You love to think you know more than others know about themselves don't you? Massive support, hmmm all candidates get support in some form from these groups. It's also logical to see anyone who is for freedom to the degree RP is they will by any logic get these people. The only way you could trully harp on questioning this so much is if you have no logic or common sense, which one is it? No Gtech I do not support him yet as I strongly question his stance on Iraq, you do the usual and lie as it's all you've got. I have no multiple positions, I however find it hard at keeping up with all the times you are owned, proven wrong, lie, and try to decieve. Is this all you can do is lie, seriously Gtech you make yourself out to be a joke and nothing more. Gtech how many times do I have to say it before you'll give up on your lies, I do not yet support him. Primarily because of his stance on Iraq, but yeah keep lying to yourself, whatever keeps you warm at night. Success in Iraq, you better believe it. We have been lied to, misled for so long, a few months of body counts going down is FAR from success. A war is a bit different than candidates as well. You also appear to not get the simple point that you are only demanding on this forum questions from RP, brought up by right wingers, primarily based on a small group of his supporters and not his actions. Not at all Gtech, the only hypocrite here is you. You are simply a delusional liar, nothing more, nothing less. I have owned you so many times in this thread it's not even funny, yet you hold on thinking you are right. It's so funny my sides are hurting, I just hope your heart holds out. If I deflected Gtech you'd enjoy it as it's a good part of your tactic. Skirting, nope not at all I showed the world the hypocrite that is Gtech. You are delusional Gtech, take your pills and come into reality. It's not such a scarey place, the terrorists are not going to get you. It's ok to come out of the closet once in awhile. You have done exactly what you claim I would do, you called names, you tried calling me a liar, anything to twist the facts around that in fact you were shown to be a true hypocrite. Now you are trying very, very weakly I might add to end the ownage of you by putting your take on the situation, only you and your drones will believe it by the way. The only one being a hypocrite or dishonest is you Gtech, come on, come into the light that is reality! You are not going around demanding anything of your candidate, in fact you tried to avoid it, then side stepped it, then 1/2 assed answered, then tried to claim it was 'rumor' oh my god stop making it so easy Gtech. I have no candidate at this time, when I have one I will have questions for him/her. I actually have questions for all of them, I however am not going around singling one individual to attack over and over. If you can put so much energy onto one, I'd imagine you could put some into demanding answers from the others as well. Iraq is a war based on lies, a bit different don't you think? Especially when I do not have a candidate yet. I also have posed a question for the man YOU think I support, but yep keep bypassing that and lying, hell you are good at denial and being a liar. Oh, my senile old fool, keep living in that demented Gtech reality of yours.
LMAO, yep the bumpy poobah needs a break. Defending anti-semitic, neonazi, troofer and anarchist supporters is hard work. No one does it better than grim, though!
Nobody is defending anything, but I guess 'logic' is out of touch with your capabilities.. Nobody does the twist and turns better than Gtech.
LOL mate I am still amazed that you still debate him. Remember that everything is fine in GTech World.
Good job GTech. Your 'smeary spammy thread' has covered seven pages. I'm glad to see you love having your fun ~~~~ Did you learn that Dr. Ron Paul draws a very wide variety of individuals who love freedom? and Dr. Ron Paul... He views people as individuals not groups, so... By definition it is impossible to label this honest man a racist. I'm glad we could help to teach you these important facts.
Let's get one thing straight. RP has a better chance of getting the Republican nomination than Obama does of getting the Democratic nomination. Sorry bud, Hillary already has that locked up.
Well, I see a lot of RP supporters trying to change the subject, but I don't see anyone really dealing with Gtech's open letter? I wonder why?
I've made clear in at least 5 posts my stance on the matter, and publicly denounced these groups personally. Maybe you missed that, or are purposefully ignoring it?