[An experiment]Anyone ranking No#1 for any keywords? Please report here

Excellent thanks! My stats needed a boost, the graph in Awstats looks huge now.

 

i have dozens of #1 serps and top 10 serps in G and massive traffic
but if you want to succeed then you have to learn your own experiences and lessons on YOUR topic of expertise and NEVER based on where OTHERS get their traffic.

learn to do something YOU LOVE to do and you are GOOD at. then write a few thousand pages on the entire topic and you get

- #1 serps on various keywords / combinations of your topic
- thousands of ten thousands of uv/d

PM or public ... there is a reason why Y and G stopped to provide many public details on OTHER ppls sites. spying is the cheapest way to get a share of success without contributing to the mountain of work needed to be done.

 

I rank #1 but it's only for a 2-word keyphrase that only has 484,000 results. I only get around 1-3 uniques per day from Google.

 

Assuming that you had a legitimate interest and a true desire to help others, you are going about this all wrong. No one is going to give you that info directly. But you might do as I did for the same reasons you seem to be running your experiment, and create your own search engine, and track your own internal data for the experiment.

 

^^ Own search engine? How will that help me know the Google traffic?

 

It won't. But it will help you get a bearing on how frequently certain key terms are searched and clicked.

Google will only tell you how many searches a phrase gets on a scale from 0-to-5, but they will not expose actual numbers.

You can use WordTracker to get search numbers, but that is derived from the Dogpile search engine. WordTracker theorizes that there are X number of Google searches, only because dogpile features google as one of their target search engines, and they figure that Google gets X times more actual searches than Dogpile. WT then extrapolates that data to make an estimation of Google searches on a keyword phrase.

You can use Overture, which is only available sometimes, but does not give you enough information to truly understand the numbers. The downside on Overture is that it mixes similar words and phrases, and then defines the whole batch of similar phrases as having the same number of searches.

And none of the engines will show you how often something will actually be clicked, no matter where it might appear in the search results.

If you want an accurate understanding of this information, you must somehow compile that information for yourself, since no one at the search companies wants to give us that info directly.