lmfao...at YOU!!!! You cannot remotely stay on topic... and you wonder why so many people have you on their ban list....after that last stupid comment, you are officially back on mine...
You won't. Tell me what is there to win please? I mean "you" as in the great American people, not as in the Oil Companys and people like Bush and Cheney, Halliburton etc.
d16man : I wonder what drives you. You are like a robot repeating yourself in each thread in Politics forum. You don't really provide any added value but just some things you "heard" and then you think you know and are able to discuss .... You know we all have TV at home and can see similar propaganda you are trying to push to us. Oh and it is pretty obvious you don't have gworld on ignore
Why do you have to reduce the killing of sons and daughters to a petty little remark about party politics?
If he is not working for Bush then he should be mate is all I can say. He could also maybe work alongside Bill O'Reilly, cheerleading the absolute disaster along with Unca Bill, blind to absolutely everything that is wrong with the Bush administration and accusing anyone that dares to differ a terrorist supporter lol.
He said he was putting gworld back on ignore. Now I see why you don't understand much of what he says. (Although, if English is a second language to you it would be understandable.)
Are you challenging d16man to be GTechs wingman mate? I see you cropping up a lot saying very similar things to d16man all the time these days. I hope this don't end in tears. If it does Mia is after a wingman I think.
Let me quote d16man for a guy that is kind of english teacher for me, yes ? At that time guess even if soooo many people had gworld on ignore list, d16man was still listening As for his "beliefs" about holy US wars around the world. Well guess we have different views on the world and his are pretty much clear. Those who are not with us are against us. By his own words that means we are terrorists. 9/10 of the world population is terrorizing US because we don't always follow their politics and view on world order .... you got that right hehe
it seems to me that the dems only want to hurt the troops, not help them...they can't even get a budget voted on, but yet a non binding resolution disagreeing with the war was the first thing they did....they hate our troops and george bush equally...how many dems have had to backpedal after calling our troops worthless or wasted lives? Quite a few, including RINO John McCain.... hes on my ban list....In that quote I said he was "going back" on my ban list...not that he was already there....do you really read the posts?? My belief is not for "Holy War"....if it was, you would find me talking about the church a whole lot more...never once have I called for Holy War, unlike your buds in Iraq...since you said we have different views, and I am NOT for Holy War nor have ever claimed as much, I guess that makes you FOR it, right?? And it seems to me the ones calling for that are the terrorists....figure out what you are and then let us know....
if Bush had to think (doubtful he can) before sending over troops the death rate would be 0%. if death rate is down by 60% what about the other 40% and if it takes getting soliders killed to make Bush and his party look good, why would you be in favour of his administration??
From the time you started this thread, 6 US-Soldiers died and over 10 have been injured source. If you really want to support your troops bring em home to their families.
love it when this is the best argument the left can come up with... so you think that people are getting killed just to make Bush look good? Let's see you backpedal out of that one...and what about all the people saddam killed, did that make him look good? I would rather be fighting terrorists in the middle east than having them blow up our cities, homes, towns, and innocent people...remember they did that on 9/11...or have you conveniently forgotten? Here are the headlines from your site that you posted: Thursday, 15 March 2007 Coalition forces kill two terrorists, detain 11 others Thursday, 15 March 2007 Suspected IED emplacer arrested in Rushdi Mullah Thursday, 15 March 2007 Iraqi Army Soldier killed in incident Thursday, 15 March 2007 MND-N security discussed at leaders' conference Thursday, 15 March 2007 MNF-W non-combat casualty incident Thursday, 15 March 2007 MNF-W forces attacked Thursday, 15 March 2007 Iraqi Army working with district advisory council Thursday, 15 March 2007 IED emplacers killed in Mosul Thursday, 15 March 2007 Insurgents attack Iskandariyah bus factory with vehicle-borne improvised explosive device Wednesday, 14 March 2007 MNF-W forces attacked Wednesday, 14 March 2007 Stryker battalion begins operations in Baqubah’ footage available on DVIDS Wednesday, 14 March 2007 Task Force Lightning patrol attacked I see plenty about arrests, but only one about a non-combat death, and one about an iraqi death....all of this was posted since the time I made the original post....however, I see that 2 terrorists were killed and at least 11 others capurted...why all the bad news about america, and no bad news about the terrorists? Why are you celebrating US soldiers deaths by wanting them to come home and letting the terrorists win? Why not FINISH the job? Why pull out and run like a bunch of cowards?? Is this really the message to send to our troops? I think the dems are already doing that to the best of their ability.
You forgot to read the last one you posted: Task Force Lightning patrol attacked Because there is no progress since 2003, its just getting worse. I would love to hear good news but there isn't. I'm not celebrating US soldiers deaths, I care about them, thats why I say its better to get them back home. Because that job can't be finished. And thats the point, how do you define when the job is done. What has to happen?
I missed that one, my mistake...doesn't change the fact that the death rate is still way down since the buildup, which was my original post... How about Saddam being removed and hanged? Is that not good news? What about Al Zarqawi being killed, is that not good news? Let me give you some other links: http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/016914.php http://www.dfn.org/good_news_iraq.shtml http://www.kmax.ws/b/goodnewsiniraq.htm http://chrenkoff.blogspot.com/2004_05_16_chrenkoff_archive.html http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ed.../the_good_news_from_iraq_is_not_fit_to_print/ The last one is my favorite, I think it sums up what people actually read and what the liberal media likes to print... The job can be finished, but if you sit at home and think doom and gloom, then it cannot...how about do this, get behind our troops, support them, encourage your friends, neighbors, and congressional representatives to do the same...then lets see how quickly this war will be won and be over...however...if you sit at home and just cheer the democrats on in all their non-binding resolutions (which in the mean time while they are passing these they can't even give the troops the money they need to complete the job) then no, the war cannot be won, we will give the region back to the terrorists, who in turn will not stop building an empire until they have conquered the world...no thanks, I never want to live in that type of war....I don't care if you don't like Bush, but don't take away the support from the troops that they deserve.