American forces free Canadian hostages; Canadians immediately blame America

Are you serious, GTech? Or are you just joking with me now?

Look at the inacurate post that began this thread. You think that I am upset that Canadians are involved??? Did I use the term "pig f*ckers" without realizing it?

I reported no inaccuracies. I thought the original post was missing some key information, making it inaccurate. I do not wish to cover up ANY of this story. I say, the more information, the better, even if you only want me to look to Yahoo and Will's inaccurate post and no other sources.

So, just in case you are confused about my position. Look at as many sources as possible on this and do not cover up any of it.

 

So why did you say that he is not an active liar, shouldn't you say that he is not a liar or he is honest instead?

Are you stating that he is not a liar because he posts in SEO section, does this mean that anybody who posts in SEO section is not a liar? How about if someone post in buy & sell section, does this make them a liar or honest?

Since the rest of us, lack your insight about this matter, would you mind to give a list of all categories in DP with marking for each section that posting in it makes a person a liar or honest?

Are you sure about the last 2 word of your posting? " I think"
I can think of many people here who will hardly doubt that statement.

 

Looking over the posts in this thread, I think I'm not the only person with animosity brought about by Will, eh GTech?

I didn't think you guys were close.

 

Yes, I was serious about that part. You two did recently have a very heated argument. It's not far fetched to consider that.

You did. I corrected them here:
http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=739793&postcount=16

Glad we finally agree.

http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&q=peace+activists&btnG=Search+News

 

So then it's true, you did have animosity towards Will when you made that post? Yet still questioned if I was kidding you?

Thanks though, I do appreciate the truth.

 

Number 3 does not apply to me!



D

 

GTech, if you call this post "correcting inaccuracies", I'm not going to argue with you about it. It's useless.

 

Anyone looking at that thread can tell there was animosity between Will and I. They'd have to be obtuse to come to any other conclusion. They would also realize that Will's initial post in this thread left out a lot of information so that Will could take out some anger on Canadians. They will also come to the conclusion that the reason you are badgering people in this thread who disagree with Will becuase of your feelings towards him. It's all there for everyone to see GTech. I simply wanted all the facts to be reported. You have been challenging that idea at every turn in this thread and everyone knows why.

You can talk about animosity all you want, but none of that will take away from the accuracies in the initial post that began this thread.

 

There's no need to argue. They were corrected; new/additional stories are coming about; the heart of the story is not which forces were the lead, involved, etc. I'm glad we agree.

 

Instead of listen on yo-yo, here's the benefits of Bush in his first term:

1. High growth rate
2. Reducing the crime
3. Fighting terrorism by striking back at the talibans
4. Removing a dictator in Middle East

 

What is missing in this delicious argument is this:

Did Canada rescue their-own citizens from terrorist (I’m sorry freedom fighters)?
Do they (Canada) even care about good people helping people?
If those that were taken hostages where Homosexual would they have sent in the whole Canadian Military personal (all 60 of them) to try and free them?



D

 

You nuts probably believe that Charles de Gaulle took Paris from the Nazi's.

I am amused that the Canadians who regularly insult America on DP are suddenly arguing the point that the Canadians are not insulting America.

It would certainly strengthen their argument if they could stop insulting America at least while they are claiming that Canadians are not insulting America.

Those morons who were kidnapped went to Iraq to oppose the Americans. They were then kidnapped by their own allies. One of them, an American, was tortured and murdered. I don't see any justification for using our boys (American, British, whoever else feels like showing up to work) to rescue a bunch of enemy sympathizers from their own allies.

I say, let 'em die next time. The same rule should go for reporters who are not attached to our forces. They are adults, they chose to go in harms way, they chose not to cooperate with our military forces, let them talk their way out of being tortured and murdered.

 

So when you asked me: "Are you serious, GTech? Or are you just joking with me now?" You already knew the answer?

A breaking story doesn't always have all the information. You claim Canadians were involved in the rescue operations, yet when I look through the various stories ten minutes ago, I see no mention. Therefore if I exclude that by posting a reference and later it is disclosed, it's a lie? So what you are saying is, if it hasn't been reported yet, then not including it is a lie?

Were Canadian's involved? Yes. Did a Canadian make the statements? Yes.

Yeah, ten people making posts calling Will a liar is badgering That you call on the support of others with statements like "everyone knows why" says you are weak in your own self-confidence. You were corrected. I'm sorry you are having such a hard time dealing with it.

Nor will they take away of the inaccuracies I corrected regarding your post.

 

While I can't speak for all Canadians, I will say that I think most PEOPLE would rescue someone that needed rescuing, regardless of race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, etc. if they were in a position to do so.

 

Don't you get it?

Who was willing to rescue the Iraqi's who needed rescuing from Saddam Hussein?

Were you?

I'll tell you who was! It was the Americans! Yes, we cobbled together a multinational force consisting mainly of support troops, but it was the Americans who are responsible for the vast majority of the good work done in Iraq.

We also saved the Chinese and most of Asia from the Imperial Japanese Army and we saved most of Europe from the German army.

That seems to be the role of the American people to "rescue someone that needed rescuing, regardless of race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, etc."

All the while being spit on by the Canadians.

 

As long as you're not black AND poor.

 

The Somali's we tried to help before Clinton wet his pants weren't black and poor?

 

I'm not going to argue further with you about this GTech. It is pointless.

I told you earlier that if you wanted to make this a "Canadian thing" then it would be fine. Who am I to stop you from trying to do that?

I simply stated that the initial post was not accurate. If it's accurate enough for you, then that's fine too. I'm not going to try to convince you otherwise. You will see the world as you want, with or without my words.

BTW, Canadians WERE involved in the rescue operation. Maybe tomorrow, when YAHOO reports it, you'll come back and post that information. I doubt it, but one can always hope.

 

US have rescued lots of blacks.

And why are Condo in the Government? Because she is white? US is simply not a racsist country.

 

OK, we hate them, but the rest of America we love. No, I take that back...many love the black-Lesbian (CR) who will be the next president of the US.




D