ALLINANCHOR - What the F....

Discussion in 'Google' started by mcdar, Feb 8, 2005.

  1. 12FreeForums

    12FreeForums Peon

    Messages:
    72
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #21
    I have a sandboxed site that is #1 and #2 in allinurl, #11 for allinanchor, allintext

    Should I expect a good placement once we clear the sandbox?
     
    12FreeForums, Feb 10, 2005 IP
  2. chachi

    chachi The other Jason

    Messages:
    1,600
    Likes Received:
    57
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #22
    I would not "expect" anything right now.
     
    chachi, Feb 10, 2005 IP
  3. compar

    compar Peon

    Messages:
    2,705
    Likes Received:
    169
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #23
    As we say in Canada, Too fucking true!

    I don't see Shawn and Minstrel in here claiming that Google isn't broken any more. Strange don't you think?

    This isn't even a matter of "my site doesn't show up top ten any more". This is Googles' records are totally screwed. They don't know allinanchor or allinurl or any site related parameter. These thing don't take a judgement to be made about relevance. These are just pure statistical reporting and they are so far from being accurate on these things that the only possible explanation is that their system is horribly broken.
     
    compar, Feb 10, 2005 IP
  4. earlpearl

    earlpearl Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,584
    Likes Received:
    150
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    155
    #24
    My experience has been that specific anchor text bls has driven my site up for a variety of keywords. First bls, then increases in allinanchor, then increases in serps.

    Pretty much that is all I've done for higher serps. My business competes for phrases where there is not a lot of competition in this context. Consequently this limited strategy has worked well.

    If allinanchor is plummeting for a bunch of sites then big G is dramatically changing things.

    Dave
     
    earlpearl, Feb 11, 2005 IP