All SEO is Blackhat : Do You Agree?

yes but how does google find out about link buys?

if tomorrw you put my link on your site and and paypal u money, how can G find out..never

 

If I create 5000 blogs on multiple class c's across multiple datacenters at the push of a button all posting relevant, non intrusive information, how will G ever find out?

Them finding out has nothing to do with whether it's white or black.

 

I'm not saying they will find out...my points is that every calls that white hat yet google says its wrong..while google says spamming is wrong and every is like oh thats black hat cause google says so...

 

Well. I definitely disagree that SEO is blackhat.
I think about linking (for example) as books referring to one another. You know when you open up a book and it has a section where the author says thanks to the one who has inspired him/her. This works as if the book/author being referred to is the great content by the new site.

Kind of natural way to bring out whats good out there.

 

If you have the knowledge of creating a Google Bomb I think you deserve to be in Google. There are ways to do it without spam like Adobe did with "click here"

 

"Hey forum members I'll trade links with you"

"Ok I link you and you link me"

"Deal"

You aren't referring anyone to a website you found and enjoy, you are trading links to game the SE's which is against their rules, acceptable practices, etc. Not following rules is generally deemed immoral or unethical. You can't say you are against breaking rules of google but only the ones that are beyond your taste. Either you are a rule breaker or you are not.

 

i ll put you on my blogroll of PR4 site if you put a link to my site:

<a href="http://www.youreasywebsolutions.com" title="SEO Battle" rel="tag">SEO Battle</a>

whats your link?

MSN me if this gets deleted

 

Wtf does this have to do with Adobe? It's not their fault that webmasters are too inept to know that using "click here" is stupid.

 

Here is a good source for you before you open your mouth with WTF

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_bomb

 

Haha okay, I totally just got lost with these last like 4 or 5 posts...what the heck is that guy talking about...sorry if I just missed it...

 

What dont you understand? Ask

 

"click here" isn't a Google Bomb, it's the result of webmasters being too inept to come up with a proper label for links.

 

I thought google fixed googlebombs? At least thats what they said in their official google blog...right?

 

too inact?

Explain this to me

http://www.seocompany.ca/pagerank/pr-10-pages.php

 

its hard to say.

things like "miserable failure" that lead to George W Bushes page and "liar" leading to tony blair websites have disappeared. But I think that has been done manually as google ranking system still depends on incoming links with the right title.

"click here" might not have been designed as a google bomb, but it sure has an effect of one. Guys at Adobe really know what they are doing

 

Oh dear God. I said it has NOTHING to do with Adobe itself. OTHER webmasters link to Adobe with that term, so they rank for it. Those OTHER webmasters are too INEPT to come up with a proper term. Now stop this bs.

 

hehe. alright

i typed INACT and then tried to edit to INEPT but there is a bug in this forum script that thought I was trying to insert URL (for some reason) which I cannot do since I am a new user (apparently).

 

Very interesting look !

Have anyone ever tried to sue them because of this ?

What do you think result of that case would be ?

 

Wow, this thread is getting a little off topic as to the orignal topic of whether you agree with the post over at Profit Geek or not. Just wondering who voted and what did you vote for?

 

This is for google images but yes.

http://news.com.com/2100-1030_3-6041724.html

http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2006/02/perfect_10_wins.htm