"All of the Palestinians must be killed; men, women, infants, and even their beasts."

"All of the Palestinians must be killed; men, women, infants, and even their beasts."

Rabbi Yisrael Rosen, director of the Tsomet Institute, a long-established religious institute attended by students and soldiers in the Israeli settlements of the West Bank.


For decades:

• We have seen them stealing land
• We have seen them demolishing homes
• We have seen what they did to Gaza recently
• We have seen the brutal attacks against the flotilla
• We seen how they are currently building illegal settlements
• We know they have a nuclear program

Will they nuke us all? after all:

• "The Jews are called human beings, but the non-Jews are not humans. They are beasts."
  Talmud: Baba mezia, 114b
  
• "The Akum (non-Jew) is like a dog. Yes, the scripture teaches to honour the the dog more than the non-Jew."
  Ereget Raschi Erod. 22 30
  
• "It is the law to kill anyone who denies the Torah. The Christians belong to the denying ones of the Torah."
  Coschen hamischpat 425 Hagah 425. 5
  
• "Every Jew, who spills the blood of the godless (non-Jews), is doing the same as making a sacrifice to God."
  Talmud: Bammidber raba c 21 & Jalkut 772

You think your safe? Think Again.​

​

 

I have quoted this so you don't try to delete it later and pretend you didn't post it.

Here's a list of all of the falsifications about Hebrew books: http://www.freemasonry.bcy.ca/anti-masonry/van_hyning.html

I found it because the first Talmud quote you published, from "Libbre David," is non-existent, so obviously you haven't bothered to research this yourself. Check your Talmud quotes against that list, and after that, check your quotes against what the Talmud says, and after you have done that, repost all of the quotes you still think are a concern.

I don't doubt that every religious book has moronic quotes in it, but you have clearly posted at least one quote which doesn't even exist.

 

Cool fake quotes and shit thread bro. Troll.

 

Very well, it may be non existant, no problem.

The other quotes stay untill ALL are disproved.

Should you disprove the rest, I will post fresh verses from the old testament, so I guess your wasting your time, either way your stuck.

 

I never asked you to remove the quote. In fact, from my response, you can see that I went out of my way to indicate that I was quoting the whole post of yours so you wouldn't delete it later. Preserving it in its original form goes to show the level of research you put into things before posting them here.

You have already proven one of your quotes is wrong. In fairness, don't you think that the burden ought to be on you to provide the accuracy and context of the other quotes? It is, after all, your argument, not mine. It's not my job to perfect your argument for you.

If the best you can say here is that you haven't researched it to verify its accuracy, but you'll assume it's right until someone does the research for you, you aren't making any semblance of a convincing case. It's an admission on your part that you don't even know if what you posted is true or not.

And, post from the Old Testament all you want. I already said that every religion has moronic quotes. My only dispute was that you hadn't bothered to post a credible post since the first Talmudic quote you provided didn't even exist.

 

I did not say the first quote is non existant, you made that claim, I said it "may" be non existent.

I am not obligated to research the matter any further, and should anyone successfully refute these verses, I have a fresh batch ready to be posted.

 

Why would you nuke so many people? are you that violent? It appears you are on of the evil people on this planet willing to kill innocent civilians, shame on you.

You also don't want anyone to reply so the thread can sink into no mans land, and nobody gets to see this shocking information, you might as well run to the mods and ask them to delete my thread, as the mods deleted my old thread of 5 pages: where Zionists have been exposed to the bone.

 

You won't even acknowledge that the quote from a plainly non-existent Talmudic book doesn't exist? You can only concede a "may"?

Based on your standards, refuting anything of yours would be futile. You do not engage in the vetting of your quotes to ensure their accuracy, and you have stated that you will post a "fresh batch" if one does, which presumably follow the same research standards as the refuted quotes.

In any event, it's impossible to refute the verses because the best one can do is say, "I searched for what you posted and I couldn't find it." That's why the burden is on you to give a real source that you verified for your evidence. If you can't or won't do that, your posts are useless.

Once again, your attitude is an admission that you don't know whether what you post is correct and you don't care to find out. It's not very convincing--whatever it is that you're trying to convince us of.

 

Not at all.

The talmud is big, it may not be all online, I am not going to research wether all verses are in fact from there, some sources say that the talmud is volumes and volumes that can fill an entire library.

So again, I'm prepared to be wrong, all it takes is disproving the verses, that's it, I can afford that, since I have verses from the old testament which are a bit easier to prove.

 

Don't bother posting it if you don't know whether it exists.

For the Hell of it, here's the next quote you posted, after the one you originally declared "may" not exist (you refuse to provide evidence of its existence and won't concede that you were wrong):

This book exists but the quote does not exist. Here's the link to what you're quoting from: http://www.halakhah.com/babamezia/babamezia_114.html

You can do the rest of your own quotation fact checking for yourself. I don't know what you hope to accomplish by posting things you admittedly don't know to be true.

And, once again, post as many religious quotes as you like. I'm not trying to defend any religion--only point out that you can't be bothered to research a reason to decide whether what you say is true, so nobody else has any reason to believe it to be true, either.

 

And so chimes in the would be pornographer.

What, you didn't say that? You've said a lot of stuff, how do we know you didn't say that. I doubt I have access to everything you may or may not have said at one point.

The point of my (mis)quote is obvious. If you don't have a credible source for your information, the information is not credible. Period. It must suck to not only get caught posting lies as fact, but then to be outted as not smart enough to understand the difference. Really.

 

Still wanking to the idea of having your own imaginary porn empire, I see. Should we expect anything less from a liar who cannot even distinguish between the Goldstone report and the Gaza flotilla report?

 

I did the same as you did, I got the quotes from a website, what makes you think that your website is anymore authentic, the answer is you probably don't know. So please If you are going to play hero, at least bring Talmudic scholars disproving these quotes not links to websites that are questionable with regards to their authenticity.

 

Ya besides the fact that nutcases are ignored i civilized places my personal opinion about the OP is that :

 

Menj, you spend a lot of time talking about me wanking. Does Awin know you spend so much time thinking about other guy's wanking? What am I saying, you are a pornographer, of course she does. By the way, I want to thank you for sharing the Goldstone report with all of us here at DP. It is not often someone like yourself publishes a report from the UN that overtly condemns Hamas and the people of Gaza as war criminals.

 

No, you provided quotes from the Talmud that were from a website, not from the Talmud. I'm quite certain you can find 100% of the text of the Talmud online. If your quote's exist, provide links directly from the book.

 

Since you seem to get on a high each time you talk about someone owning an imaginary porn empire, it is obvious to me that you enjoy wanking to the idea as well. No need to deny it. You probably don't have the money to start porn websites (much less legit ones), so you accuse others of owning them and then wank to that idea. Poor you.

Still unable to come to terms with the fact that not only you are quite off the mark with regard to your confusion between the Goldstone report and the Gaza aid flotilla report, you cannot even accept the idea that the UN pinpoints Israel as war criminals during their war crime on the Mavi Marmara. Hence you have to introduce a straw man involving Hamas, even though they are not even mentioned in the Gaza aid flotilla report.

 

Menj, why are you thinking about Obamanation wanking? I thought being gay was punishable by death in Islam. Even if you're pretending to be your wife again, isn't that still grossly inappropriate?

As far as the OP goes - it's all BS. I've never met a Jew yet who had a problem with me being an Atheist. Hell, most the Jews I've met/know aren't even anti Islam - even though they have more reason to be than anyone.

Menj, please STFU and stop denying the porn site stuff. Everyone here knows now and when you deny it you just look like an idiot. You are not convincing anyone - but like you said previously, it's fine, because the porn isn't for Muslims. Right?

 

Just because you too enjoy rubbing to an O as well and joining your pal Abomination in his wanking to the idea of owning a porn empire doesn't mean that my husband owns the imaginary porn empire you both keep bitching about.