Al Qaeda is FAILING - Communications intercepted!

Depends if you're going to enter into a grown-up discussion or contine avoiding facts with your usual (mock?) ignorance?

 

Don't forget to tell your new friend, "sometime." Wouldn't want to leave your pretend friends out of the action

 

LOL, avoiding the facts (that you were wrong) again?
You're good at that
At least mine were typos, I was amused that you're actually that dumb

 

Are you suggesting the "antiwar" site is yours? You run that site? That's your source for an argument?[/QUOTE]

 

Yes, yours are always (and very often) *just* typos

I'm really impressed with your coherent arguments. It reminds me of another term you might be interested in discussing.

 

Yep, I type fast, rather that than just be plain dumb

Dumb, bigoted, old fool? I'm not sure which one to start with

 

Actually, I did that here.

and your response was:

In other words, if you don't agree with me, you are a fool. That sure sounds like familiar territory, huh?

Note my post, I didn't say a negative thing to you at all. In fact, I gave you a little more lattitude after that, because I know you can't help it.

Remember the last time we tango'd? I remember a few cracks I let slide and even noted "that's twice now." I let them go.

I think what you mean to say is "Depends if 'I' am going to enter into a grown-up discussion or contine [sic] avoiding facts with your usual (mock?)"

So what's it going to be?

 

The site that posts real budget data could be any site. The numbers I started with are real numbers that can be verifed at many .gov and conservative sites and liberal sites. It's raw data, not opinion.

The analysis of the real numbers was math I did. Math don't lie.

You are making it quite clear by avoiding them that you lost this one.

What's next?

I'll be cracking another cold Becks waiting for the next insult to come since you can't disbute the numbers.

 

All you got is a spell checker and the arugment that debating in your style is bad?

You are way off your game tonight. WOW, I'm disappointed. Off your meds perhaps?

hehe, that was fun acting like you, but not a means to an end. Now I know how you feel when you get owned. But at least my effort was just a trial in being like you...

Something "I" won't try again. The euphoria was too short lived.

 

No, I allow other people to have a opinion other than my own - unlike others
You're a fool because your opinion is foolish

Yep, how can I forget. As soon as you appear on the horizon a sensibe discussion is ruined as you never address the facts, make snide comments and deliberately misinterpret posts. And judging by other posts I'm not the only one who's noticed that. I've only not got you on ignore as it's quite amusing watching you sometimes.

 

No, I'm making it quite clear I'm not going to waste my time countering something from a purely biased site.

If you want to pull some real sources together from unbiased sites or news agencies, then I'll be happy to tango with you.

Don't insult me with some BS from antiwar.com and expect me to dive into it.

 

Or in fact you can't actually come up with anything to counter it
If you believe the facts to be wrong, then you have to prove that. Why should anyone take your word for it over another source? That's waht debate is all about, welcome back to school

 

unlink mine, huh? Another one of those "typos" eh?

So you offer "if you don't agree with me, you are a fool" and assert that you allow others to have an opinion? Well that's mighty nice of you! And all that's required to have a differing opinion that you is to be foolish.

In this case, a sensible response was started by myself. And your response to that? Anyone who disagreed with you was a fool. And still going at it too.

No wonder you are in sales. You've taken blatant lying to a new level.

 

Help me out here bud, I smell hypocrisy for a second time tonight! I highlighted your hypocrisy again. I kind of like it when you do that. Do you have some more?

 

Cool, yo! is here. Three on one with no substance! I like the odds

 

The site posted public data. I used the data. I did not use their opinion. You are trying to be like Bush, repeat a lie enough times and it may become the truth.

The truth is the numbers are real. There is no opinion. The site didn't analize the data, I did.

You can't dispute the data and you are running from it. PERIOD

Come on, stop the lies. There is no opinion, there is data. Numbers. Numbers don't lie. If they did, you'd be all over it and you know it.

Poor GTech got fucked up by real numbers and can't win so he lies and distorts.

I have to go now. You bored me.

 

Yes because I actually believe that 'unlike' is spelt that way. Just because you have literacy problems doesn't me we all do

That depends if the conflicting opinion is foolish or not.

No, now you're going back to your usual tactics of putting words into people mouths again. I guess you find it hard to stop doing that?
If someone disagrees with me then fine. If they disagree with me and put forth a stupd arguement with no facts to back it up, then yes that's foolish in my book.

Used to be, I was pretty good at it. Salesmen that lie always get caught out. The best people in sales listen and solve problems. Maybe I could give you some training in that?

 

It's just hilarious! One after another after another! If I thought you were doing it on purpose, I'd stop laughing, but...

Well that's awfully nice of you! It's probably not even hypocritic either, eh?

They were your own words. Did you forget so soon? I agree, you are a victim...just not in this case

Thanks for the offer, but I'd rather not step down. Most people don't respect liars.

 

Have you considered the possibility of gather data from legitimate sources, posting it and posting the legitimate sources from where you gathered it and why you feel it proves Bush eats babies?

I'm truly flattered that you seek my opinion on this matter. It's humbling that you respect me enough to value my opinion. I mean that! But if you want me to comment, source legitimate data from legitimate sites that I can verify and have the similar amount of time you've had, in analysing the data.

Please tell me that's not a fair request? After all, it is me you are calling out like a young "billy the kid," the least you could do is provide some sourced material other than a miserable compilation you put together for an antiwar site. Reasonable, right?

 

Guys, it's been fun. Since clearly Matt is not capable of reasoned discourse that I offered here, with no insults (and even a personal note that I was not trying to twist his reply) in a cordial manner and only offers to call people foolish who do not agree with him, we've come to another point of useless insults, lies and deception from Matt. That's what some sales people do.

I've gotta head out for a while. By all means, since reasoned cordial discourse cannot be had, continue on without me. You don't need my help to offer insults and lies. In fact, you might even bring yo-yo in and have him mock me by playing my role. I can think of nothing that would be more flattering. Would be nice to wake up to!

g'night gents (oh, and Matt)