Al Qaeda is causing the CA wildfires. (Fox Noobs)

So what if Ron Paul likes Fox? Doesn't mean his supporters have to.

 

Thank you! You were able to get my point!

 

Why do you want AQ ruled out without proof, are you frightened of FOX getting them a bad name?

 

im not saying i want them ruled out, im saying of all the potential suspects.. all of the areas residents.. 8-10 million??? any people visiting at the time they were started.. 1-2 million people?? and al qaeda... make no sense to single 1 group out of over 10 million people.

 

Good!

Nobody not even FOX singled them out, did they?

 

Fox signled them out by mentioning there names.... if you are watching the news and they are telling a story of an armed robbery and this guy named Jim who said he was going to rob a store... your going to assume that their number 1 suspect is Jim

 

FOX didn't single them out, FOX said they have made threats/plotted this type of thing in the past, FOX has never said anyone has done it.

FOX even mentioned it was probably a citizen(s) are FOX blaming citizens without proof?

These are just possibilities that are floating around.

I don't know why your so bothered about AQ anyway, let them come & sue for slander

 

1. Fox mentioned them... as I said if they were reporting a story about an armed robbery of a cenvenience store, and then said they know a guy named Jim said he wanted to rob a convenience store,,, In my scenerio just as yours they did not say it was Jim... they said there was an armed robbery and that a guy named Jim said he was going to rob a store... Fox relies on people to put the puzzle together and come up with the missing link...

There were fires started.... Al Qaeda said they want to start fires..... ____???

Al Qaeda started fires!!!!

Sadly that is how most people see these things.




Secondly, I think it is terrible they are mentioning Al Qaeda with the fires because if you haven't noticed the government is always trying to justify a certain war that is going on... with the Republicans support.... Fox is pretty damn republican... Fox knew what they were doing: Trying to get the people behind the war but making some of them think al qaeda has struck in the US again, we better straighten up and support this war against them.

 

Word... Poor Americans thinking Arabs are burning them.

 

Gold--berg...Goooold--berg...Goooldberg

This fear mongering is pathetic There are literally millions of people who would be suspect in these fires befor Al Qaeda.

And if George Bush really cared about security more than low wages, he would enforce existing laws (like not letting just anyone into the US). The fact that he won't tells all you need to know about the fraudulent US government.

 

I see exactly what your saying & that is that FOX has badmouthed such an organization as AQ & even though they have plotted/threatened to do this type thing in the past it so be ignored, in other words a news blackout of the previous threat(s)/plot(s) by AQ would suit you.

I don't subscribe to this way of thinking as i have no sympathy for AQ nor do i care if it gets these people a bad name.

 

But you are ok with a news agency reporting a 4 year old terror story as 3 or 5 days old during a civil disaster?

 

It would suit me if they waited until they had a little more evidence to throw such a serious idea out there to the public. If anyone else commits a crime its all hush hush until there is a warrant out or the person is caught and on trial... but they take advantage of the situation knowing they can not any real suspects name... so they isntead throw fake suspects out.. Al Qaeda.. always there to take the blame until a suspect emerges.. and if none do they will just let us keep thinking it was Al Qaeda who did it.

I don't have sympathy for the Al Qaeda in the news, that did 9/11 etc... but I don't have sympothy for them in the same way I don't have sympathy for the bad guys in movies... there all just made up to scare you.

 

Didn't you do the same, recently? I believe it was when you were trying to portray your country as the reason saddam had wmd (that he didn't really have, but the US was responsible for him having the wmd that he didn't really have) and were corrected.

What's that word, that starts with "hy?"

I need a tinfoil hat in this thread. Good Lord!

 

I would like to see the news agencies have a moratorium on the term "Santa Ana Winds". When the term is used on the news it triggers all the pyromaniacs from Lompoc to Chula Vista to grab their matches and car keys.

As an experiment if they all used an alternative such as "pre winter offshore flow" the next time a so called "Santa Ana Wind" occurs and see how the fires go.

 

Fox didn't single them out...how dishonest can you be?

The story has ben covered all week hundreds of times and one single time AQ was mentioned in passing! There were probably dozens or hundreds of references to other suspects/sources of the fires.

But mention the terrorist possibility once...oh God forbid! Poor AQ they just can't get a break.

 

I agree!!

What the fuck is that?

 

I am not dishonest at all, unlike the people who work over it your favorite news network; Fox.

No there have not been dozens of references to other suspects because you know why? If law enforcement has a suspect they usually keep it on the down low until they can catch the suspect so that they dont have a chance to watch the news and learn they are a suspect and have a chance to flea. I gaurantee you did not hear one other name mentioned on Fox as a suspect until long after they had that one guy in custody. And what about all of the gangs in that area? Why not mention them as starting a fire? There bad people right? What about any of the people who got liad of those days and felt like rebelling? Nope no mention of them... just mention of the ole kicking bag... Al Qaeda.


And if Al Qaeda WAS an actual suspect in this it would not be a big deal.... but the governemt, CIA, FBI, Rupurt Murdoch, and everyone else who works ar Fox knows damn well right Al Qaeada had not a GD thing to do with starting these fires, they were simply throwing the name out there to create more hate towards Al Qaeda, get the name back out in their in the peoples minds attached to another bad thing so that when Bush wants to play another war the citizens will be all ready to go to defend themselves against another boogyman that simply does not exist.

The point I am trying to make... Fox implying Al Qaeda was behind the fires is very similar to Fox blamming Sanata Clause for the fires... neither one is real. Yes there probably are a few wackos who think cand claim they are Al Qadea over in the middle east, and maybe even a few dumb asses in America that think they are Al Qaeda... but guess what my friend... the Al Qaeda you foam at the mouth to capture and destroy... they simply DO NOT exist. They are a creation to make YOU scared and to make YOU support war, and they are doing a damn good job based on the amount of effort you are putting into defending the fact that your fake enemies are real.

And you are pretty much walking proof that Fox's sneaky attempt to attach Al Qaeda to the fires is working... you are actually defending the fact that Al Qaeda is a suspect... well guess what? If Al Qaeada is a suspect than you to my friend are a suspect because there is the same amount of evidence against both of you. I am calling the hotline and reporting you as my prime suspect as the arson who started the Californiia fires... $70,000 reward here I come!!!

 

I'm not honest at all would be more accurate it's clear to anyone reading this thread.

Poor AQ, you nearly had me crying

Are FOX giving a bad name to some group that doesn't exist? are you defending a groups name that doesn't exist?

Fox never implied AQ started the fires at all.

Nobody is saying they are suspects

 

You just like running around in circles dont you?? Well you can do it on your own from here on out.