Some of you must be! That's the only way I can explain why this directory has the fewest submissions of any of my directories. PR2, do-follow, free... what more could you want? And Featured Links are only $2.99 Lifetime with 4 deep-links, instant activation, a thumbnail and colored background. Don't be afraid! http://LinkDevils.com/
"Fewest submissions" of any of your directories? Maybe some don't particularly care for the name of your directory. That's the reason I skipped it.
It's funny how people bash other directories by their names but yet the ones who are doing the bashing are wondering why they're not getting applications and money rolling in.. Kinda weird don't you think?
There is absolutely no way the listings are not coming might be the stench of spam and total lack of editorial policy.
I tell you what is your problem: you are promoting do-follow directory. No real webmaster will ever use term that doesn't exist because there is no script and HTML Code in the World that has "do-follow" tag thereafter it just technically impossible to have do-follow directory or do-follow anything... accept carrot in front of donkey. fastreplies
there are no sub categories. if some one wants to submit a new site ( PR0 ) it will end up on page 20 or above in your directory. so, they will not be bothered to submit.
except that do-follow is so much easier to say and understand than "not no-follow". I think you are being pedantic.
A better idea. Why not use the correct terms. There are two types of links; 1) follow and 2) nofollow. There is no such thing as do-follow or dofollow or any other variation.
Why even bother to say something if there is NO NEED to state publicly that in a first place? Yes, if I want to emphasize that links set to "no-follow", then at least I use correct term whereas it just plane stupid for me to proclaim something that really isn't there just so some novice who's in reality has no or very little idea what exactly "no-follow" means get even more confused by the term that doesn't make any sense not to mention doesn't exists. Beside, what difference does it makes? All this tag says is that Google won't go to or "follow" hyper-linked site, that's all. It doesn't say Google won't count backlink or penalize site that placed link it just says Google don't have to sweet needlessly. Why is something so insignificant has to be overblown out of proportion? Oh wait, I know. SEO Pros won't have nothing to say to brain powder weak-minded clients. I have better idea. Lets use "do-follow" and "don't-follow" fastreplies
People tend to want to hide their nofollow sites and instead promote theirs which are "clean". You can fight the mindset all you like, I was merely explaining why.