I've encountered such Pakistani people on youtube and different forums, who claim that "Pakistan ruled India for 700 years." Excuse me? But the country did not even exist prior to India's partition in 1947. Then hows that? Its their in their bloody textbooks! When I goad Pakistanis about this claim, some reason that since there was Muslim rule in India for 700 years, and since Pakistanis are Muslims of the subcontinent, it means that Pakistan ruled India for that period. Hello? Are all Pakistanis the descendants of those Muslim rulers? And what about Indian Muslims? There are more Muslims in India than there are in Pakistan...what about their claim to royalty? The British ruled India for 200 years, almost all of them were Christians and during that rule a chunk of Indian population also converted to Christianity. Today, Indian or Pakistani Christians converts never claim to have ruled India for 200 years. It would be stupid if they said so. Then why such an absurd and moronic claim from Pakistanis? I'd really like to understand...
The Pakis are touched by insanity and feel secure trying to imagine themselves as being far superior to Indians. This is another lame method employed by the Pakistani Educationalists to try and justify Pakistan's claims for the whole of India. Firstly - the Mughals ruled only parts of India, and it was only for a very short period of time that they ruled *almost* all parts of India. Secondly - a lot of Indian states, like Tamil Nadu, Kerala, the North East and Orissa were untouched by Moslem invasion.
Hello i am Pakistani i dont know where it is written that "Pakistan ruled India for 700 years", its muslims not Pakistanis,, i would be pleased if show me scanned copy of any Pakistani book claiming this (not moronic indian news paper).
FYI - Muslims didn't rule the whole of India at any point of time. Most of the Southern States were un-touched by Muslim invasion and the North East and most other areas as well. The Mughals didn't rule all of the Hindi belt either, they simply subjugated several rulers with the help of the Rajputs and made them pay taxes. The statement that Muslims ruled India for 700 years is similar to someone saying "Tamils ruled South East Asia for 200 years."
Hehe, I did not read this in a newspaper but heard it from a Pakistani. He said he was right because it was there is his textbook. Anyway its also mentioned in this report on Pakistan's school curriculum by Islamabad's Sustainable Development Policy Institute
LMAO...ROFL...LOL...Do such idiots still exist in the world? So, India can also say now that they rules Pakistan before it's birth, LOL.
I haven't seen pakistan text books so I can't comment on that part, but yes there are morons who do believe pakistan ruled India for 700 years, it was posted on MSN as article : http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=1865721 highlighting the following text by the commenter : Or this from Ahmed Quraishi: "(Indians) forget that they people have by and large been the slaves of Pakistanis' ancestors who ruled the region for almost ten centuries, plus the almost two centuries that they spent under the British. Pakistan is a historical continuation and is no one's gift. But for the sake of argument, there would not be India today if not for the British, who made it possible by ending the reign of Muslim India, or Greater Pakistan. In contrast, Pakistan would still have existed, in some shape or form, as a continuation of a long history."