a new 3 way link building

This is the same way how Google calculate PageRank. To make sure you are savy enough to understan math. Here's PageRank math model.

PR(A) = (1-d) + d (PR(P1)/N(P1) + ... + PR(Pi)/N(Pi) ... + PR(Pn)/N(Pn))

PR(A) - the PageRank of a page A.
d - a damping factor between 0 and 1, usually set to 0.85.
PR(Pi) - the PageRank of a incoming page Pi.
N(Pi) - the number of outgoing links from the page Pi

If you can prove why the true total PageRank value (not the toolbar PR) equals the total number of pages in the index database, then you're ready to understand the math.

The math for calculating node distance, simple enough, but much more complex than PageRank.

 

I wouldn't count on that being the case for forever.

 

I've seen all that before, dejaone... nothing at all new there... and nothing at all that says reciprocal linking is anything like a bad idea.

 

One way links are definately a boost. I have seen that. But many web masters r using now a days dirty techniques. Like nofollow or creating link anchortext and hyperlink using javascript. So that, searchengines an not figure out. And that page dont get searched.

 

Everyone seems to believe their own myth here lol

 

I don't think they penalize them, I think they just nullify each other.

 

But guy's some sites doesn't apporove such type of listing. They say that they need link on the same domain.
But I like this new trend. You can make lot of links by this!

 

I am favour in three way link building because you know it is very profitable for website. and now every one want link back for his/her website if you want link then you can use recriprocal way or three way. I want to ask every one which way select you for getting link.

It is my opinion.

Thanks,
Pssolanki86

 

It really doesn't matter. The critical factor is whether the link is relevant to your page, NOT whether it is reciprocal, one-way, three-way, or twelve-way.

 

I totally agree here with minstrel! It really doesn't matter if its a one-way or reciprocal, as long as you are doing it natually and is based on your site's theme.

Relevancy is the key.

 

Myth or not myth i have no opinion but a fact is reciprocal links seems less natural than one way link.
So we can think one way link have higher value than recips.

And i think a read something from Matts Cutts stating it's really easy for google and their computing power to detect triangular links strategies.

 

This is simply not true. As I have said repeatedly, organic linking frequently results in reciprocal linking - it's just not artifical or irrelvant reciprocal linking.

As one example, authority sites frequently link to one another - precisely because they ARE authority sites.

 

Ofcourse they link to authority sites too, but as long you link on a quality and related links there is no problem with that... iether its not an authorithy site.

 

Exactly, I am tired of ppl saying without any proof that google penalizes reciprocal link exchanges. The worst they will do is to devalue(null) that link if they find it is irrelevant and is done purely to gain ranking.

Penalizing is a double edged sword and good sites too can suffer from it and I am sure that people who design the algos understand this. I think this is where Outlink to quality sites factor comes in. If you are reciprocating with site which is "good" in search engines eyes than it should be taken as +ve(even if the sites are not relevant).

 

In my opinion one way link is still the most convenient,reliable and fastest way to get links.

 

3 Way is Very acceptable, but now all the companies are creating new websites for only this purpose and they are showing a pagerank for those sites by using the black-hat techniques. So, when u do the 3 way: U mast check the site URL in different ways....