Also, for some individual pages it's showing "516 pages in url" for yahoo - which I bet is yahoo returning pages in url for the domain.
Although I am not beta testing - the above tutorial did not work for me. [Problem] Using FireFox and MS IE browsers gives different results with Excel 2000 v9 The Cut/Paste and Unicode appear in different columns Also I never got the 'Disable' text eventhough I have javascript enabled etc. [Workaround / Requests] A possible request would be to allow a limited .csv export and .csv import to populate just the keyword and the domain. One other request is to have a one button delete to remove all the keywords/phrases but only if Shawn thinks this is necessary. I personally do not mind clicking delete for each row. In the help text of the keyword box it almost seems you can put more than one keyword matched to a domain - Is displays --- You can copy/paste your keyword/URL combos... data should be in the form of: keywords1|URL keywords2|URL keywords3|URL etc... ---- I guess keywords1 = one key phrase and not a bunch of keywords which if I did put a bunch of keywords I would have to blame myself because the ranking would not make any sense anyway
The tutorial is placed in this thread called " A Couple Testers Wanted... ". Like you say yourself, it won't work. That's because you're not a beta tester. So there's no point in trying the tutorial. You don't have the disable text because you're not using the same software. The whole tutorial is actually pointless for the old KWT because you can't copy it anywhere but to Google again (where the phrases are already being tracked).
Looks like it might be data center flux... I didn't change anything, and I got 39 when I entered it. Then I deleted it and added it again and it was 4,230.
I keep getting this error trying to get on the new page Parse error: parse error, unexpected ')' in /home/.sites/28/site1/web/****/****/functions.php on line 121
'Bulk' bulk addition seems to work a lot better than on the old KWT. Just added 170 x 2 (Y+M) in one go and only the last 9 got missed. Before that I added about 80 x 2 and they all went through perfect in one go.
The lookups are going to be faster because the requests are coming from your server, instead of millions per day coming from my server. So it offloads the main bottleneck on my end (just a massive amount of queries per second).
Noooooo, I think it should only be used by the few that tested it (oh and the guy that set it up!) Yes, unleash it..
I would say yes. I haven't seen any problems. And to think, I almost bought webceo, but then I saw you mention you were working on this.
Yeah, the errors I was seeing have been fixed... tried to break it again, but no go... Looks like it's production ready.