9-11 Myths Debunked by Popular Mechanics

I figure since there is a 9-11 myth video up, I'll counter and post a link to where the myths are debunked by using a little thing called science and truth.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html

 

This so called Debunking raises more questions than gives us answers.Straight from the article:
"NIST investigators believe a combination of intense fire and severe structural damage contributed to the collapse, though assigning the exact proportion requires more research. But NIST's analysis suggests the fall of WTC 7 was an example of "progressive collapse," a process in which the failure of parts of a structure ultimately creates strains that cause the entire building to come down. Videos of the fall of WTC 7 show cracks, or "kinks," in the building's facade just before the two penthouses disappeared into the structure, one after the other. The entire building fell in on itself, with the slumping east side of the structure pulling down the west side in a diagonal collapse."

How come the smoke and dust is not being reflected on building 7?


They say they believe, they have no fucking proof! This whole article is nothing but speculation.

 

Popular Mechanics was debunked a long long time ago mate, get with the times man!

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/august2006/100806popularmechanics.htm

 

What about the other side of the building the side actually closest to the falling towers?

 

Check this post of mine from the middle of last year exposing the Popular Mechanics for the idiots that they are.

http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=451786

They should stick to tractors and such things.

 

Thanks AGS. I wish you would have posted like 10 minutes earlier it would've saved me 5 minutes of my time replying to this stupid thread.

 

Sorry mate.

This dude soniqhost is about 18 months behind everybody else!

 

Your serious right? Popular Mechanics scientific evidence is wrong because their foreword to their book is written by John McCain.

and because

They support guns and John MCCain supports them that explains everything.

 

Comment from Youtube user:
"I really wonna slap this guy in the face with my c**k"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLx5GATh_z0

 

Listen to the two YouTube clips in that thread I posted dude.

The Popular Mechanics fool was totally Pwned by Charles Goyette.

The fact that Insane McCain writes a foreword in their lame book should also set alarm bells ringing too.

We were discussing this nearly one year ago on this very forum, go and read some old posts because you are a long way behind us all here. I got a hint of Groundhog Day when I read your OP.