I forgot to mention that AGS didn't answer the stuff he had to, he just came up with something new.. It was designed to survive the impact of a Boeing 707 seeking to land, travelling at 180 mph. Not a Boeing 767 traveling at 470 mph or 590 mph. Argue for yourself instead of letting videos doing the job for you, I don't have time to watch those. He certainly is, it takes a dumbass to fake the biggest terrorist attack in modern history in front of the whole world But you haven't answered the questions I gaved you.. were was it from(if it was from some other place)? Where did the Flight 93 go. It was traced to Shanksville and crashed, if the plane would go anywhere else, you have to prove it. What about all people that worked with collecting the remain of the plane? What about all the eyewitnesses that saw flight 93 crash? Bull? How do you know? You just think it's odd without going in on details, that's all. Flight 93 crashed at a speed of 580 mph. Furthermore, answer my questions in my previous post! Assumptions.. do you think that the buildings should fall directly or a few seconds after the plane have hit it in the same direction? The towers collapsed from the fire. The construction of the building made it fall as it did. If that wasn't the case, it would be easy to disprove. The explosions were probably from stuff inside such as generators or it could just be collapsing floors. Hearing explosions when a building burns isn't as unusual as you think. Ask any fireman about that. You've had more than a half year to prove it. Yet, you havn't been able to bring up anything that wasn't easy to debunk. It's sad to see the news more frequently reporting about troother theories which have no basis in fact. Think about all kids growing up with this bullshit.
Lol get real, main stream media tell the witnesses what they saw? are you deluded. Eye witnesses saw the actual events play out in front of them in New York, how do you answer this MSM? The media even played live footage straight to the eyes of millions watching live on TV...
Dude I'm not an MIT engineer .... look at the video and do your math. by the way the wtc was made to be able to handle two planes. What happened this day with the jews ??? Take some time to find the answer , or you can just reply to this message by something "You suck, I know it's the truth because my mom say so" .. Also do some researches and check the 3 building assurance. You will find surprising stuff or again you can reply "I dont care" see you.
So, now its 2 planes? Next, we'll hear that the WTC was designed to handle a nuclear impact, why did the flights (at this point they'll be crop dusters) make them fall? You actually believe the myth that the jews were prewarned don't you? It is a myth, with no basis in reality. You realize this right?
The WTC buildings were designed to survive impacts from much smaller aircraft. Construction on the WTC began in 1966. The Boeing 767's that took down the towers entered service in 1982. The idea that the WTC's were designed to withstand the impact of a Boeing 767 is clearly ridiculous. It's amazing the type of lies that people will make up to support their prejudices -- especially after their religious bretheren have already admitted their guilt in the attack. Actually, it's beyond amazing -- its dishonest.
There are far more engineers that agree with the official story than disagreeing. By not agreeing, you get some attention. Also, being an engineer is not always the same thing as being intelligent. Bring up the claims on the table, I've watched too many 9/11 videos already. Don't want to watch another. The world is full of liars and idiots, you need the capability to think for yourself. You mean four planes totally for WTC1 and WTC2? Each of these buildings were designed to handle a Boeing 707 flying in 180 mph. Planes that were seeking to land. The Boeing 767 planes flew 470 mph and 590 mph. If you have a metal ball that weights 2 pounds and throw it on a window, the window can handle the ball if the speed is slow enough. If you throw it harder, the window can brake. Got it? What jews? Where? I don't know what you mean.. and by the way, yes.. you suck So you're surprised that Larry Silverstein had insurance on wtc7. Is that what your trying to say? What about if someone gets insurance on his/hers car. Does it mean that he/she stole it from him/her-self? Ahh.. you mean that Larry made a profit on WTC7? Well, you're wrong again, kid. He is likely to get maximum $4.6 billion in insurance. Rebuilding costs him $6.3 billion.
Amazing, if your building has a lease by Silverstein it collapses, if it isn't then it remains standing. Forget 1 and 2, 7 is the real giveaway.
Did you read what I wrote? Silverstein is going to get a maximum of $4.6b in insurance. Rebuilding costs him $6.3 billion. 4.6 - 6.3 = -1.7 Larry will loose $1.7b or more on the affair.
If 7 is the real give away, why would the government make it so obvious? If you've already hit the WTC and the pentagon with a plane, why would you use explosives on 7? Did they miscount the number of buildings that they wanted to take down? No point, Latehorn. AGS has already admitted his whole 9/11 belief is bullshit anyways with the sad "respect my beliefs" line.
I believe as the theory goes WTC is where all the secret documents were kept of the whole 9/11 operation. Guess bringing down the building is easier than burning the papers and destroying the hard drives.
Yeah. I would have fedexed them over to wtc 1 or 2 on 9/10. Seems like that's the easiest solution to me.
But then they would have had to "PULL" the fedex guy Just wondering how effective bringing down a building is at destroying all the evidence. When the towers fell there was paper work flying all over the city.
When did he increase to 4.6b insurance ? That is the question .... And trust me he will not loose a 1$. Pretty sure that he have some good friends.
Can you imagine someone having a piece of paper called "the great 9/11 conspiracy" hit them in the head while running out of wtc 1 or 2?
if the building collapsed by fire then why did you see people looking out from the hole where the plane crashed? and they say that the fire melted (if it reached melting point) the metal....bull if it did you wouldn't see people looking out of the hole where the plane hit...b/c they will BURN to death and not be looking out shocked to see what happened how about the cameras that caught the plane that crashed into the pentagon...why did the FBI confiscate the tape that caught everything? How can an unskilled pilot fly a plane 15-30 off the ground at 500 miles per hour without touching the ground? How can an unskilled pilot guide the plane at a perfect angle at 500 miles per hour with no hassle?
What makes you think the angle was perfect? Was it 90 degrees to the wall? What makes you think it was no hassle as well? Did you see the guy nudging into the wall with his knee or something? He wasn't unskilled. They were taking flying lessons. Have you forgotten? Standard procedure right? FBI, the cops always collect all the evidence and don't make it public until they have to. Do you think the cops show every piece of evidence they have when a murder is committed? Show me a time when fire engulfs 100% of everything. It doesn't. Most of the fuel went down the elevator shafts and ignited. Just because the hole is at the edge of the building, does not indicate it is the hottest point or where the explosions would be. Who says melted? Steel loses about 50% of its integrity at about 1/3 of its melting point - which is about where it reached. Do you think the building was meant to stay standing when its 50% weaker than designed? Are you actually denying a plane hit the WTC now? Visual evidence contradicts this whole statement. Anything else?
Of all the buildings that were miraculously hit by people that couldn't even fly Cessnas the main building that needed to be destroyed was WTC7. It housed so much evidence that it had to come down. And it did.
So why didn't the government hijaak another plane and ram it into wtc7? Wouldn't keeping the same thieme make a lot more sense? These were evil geniuses after all. Plane Plane Plane Plane Demolition Doesnt 1 kinda stand out for ya?
Plane 1 miraculously hits WTC1 even though the "alledged" pilots couldn't even fly little Cessnas. Plane 2 miraculously hits WTC2 even though the "alledged" pilots couldn't even fly little Cessnas. Plane 3 miraculously hits the ground floor of the Pentagon (making it even more miraculous) even though the "alledged" pilots couldn't even fly little Cessnas. Plane 4 crashes in the middle of nowhere leaving very little debris. Demolition of WTC7, the first modern steel framed building to collapse into its own footprint without even being hit by a plane.