Hi all, I just saw the two hour presentation by Richard Gage in San Francisco called "9/11 Blueprint for Truth". He is the head of the organization "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth" (http://www.ae911truth.org) that now has over 600 members, including dozens of structural engineers, who are calling for a new independent investigation into 9/11. Gage's presentation uses science, logic, facts, and common sense to explain step by step why the official theory of how the WTC and Building 7 collapsed is scientifically and logistically IMPOSSIBLE and defies basic laws of physics and conservation. He explains step by step why all the evidence and facts about the collapse points toward the explosives theory of the collapse, not the fire theory of the official version. It's very compelling and irrefutable and does not whitewash the facts like many debunking of 9/11 truth are. He deals with every fact head on. And he cites around a dozen Structural Engineers (contrary to Popular Mechanics claim that no real structural engineer believes in the 9/11 Truth movement). Anyhow, if you're open minded and willing to hear all the facts about the WTC collapse, this is a must see presentation. Here is the link to Part 1 of 13: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b74naeawdCs You can also watch it on google video: http://video.google.com/videoplay?d...SeTKI4vAwgPNr-G0Bw&q=9+11+blueprint+for+truth BTW, he also shows a comical clip where the director of NIST, which was appointed by the government to provide the final word on the collapse of all 3 steel WTC buildings at free fall speed, does not even have basic knowledge of the issues being debated. He shows a clip where the NIST director, a guy with a Ph D in Physics, says that he knows of no eyewitnesses who saw molten steel that was red hot for weeks in the WTC rubble, and then shows clips of many firefighters and clean up crew who saw just that. Obviously the NIST director is not even very well versed in the 9/11 truth debate. Likewise, in David Chandler's (Physics teacher) videos on YouTube debunking NIST, he shows the two NIST directors looking very shaky and not confident at all in their answers to his critical questions in the press conference, as if they were ashamed and feel guilty about lying and covering up the truth, which is written all over their face. Have a look: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0GHVEKrhng (NIST finally admits freefall) Anyway, if you support a new independent investigation into 9/11 and agree that those who were behind it should be criminally prosecuted, sign the petition at http://www.ae9/11truth.org
After all, the idea that 3 steel structured skypscrapers collapsing at FREE FALL speed (proven on film) due to fire all on the same day with no resistance simply defies not only common sense, but the laws of physics and conservation as well, especially since one of the three buildings was not even hit by a plane! To believe that, you'd have to be the most gullible person on earth. Fire destroys buildings slowly and gradually, not at free fall speed. This was NOT a natural collapse. All attempts to explain the official theory seem merely to obfuscate the issue, which still defies common sense.
Flight 93: Why no debris? Shocking! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-59kouBgO_s 10 reasons why the 9/11 hijackers story is fake The clincher at the end is gripping and riveting! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFqYf-ID5oY Listen to Davin from Popular Mechanics evading tough questions on the air about 9/11! When he claims that "pull it" is not a demolition term, a phone call to a demolition company is featured, showing that they lied. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WULRQCgvsdE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jub8tQvrFxY And check out what happened when Pilots for 9/11 Truth called the NTSB! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPF4Lo4wkJ4