I am asking you because I do care to hear what you have to say You see, there are people… lets call them special forces on a ground who are calling attacks and then laser-hide the bombs at targets. Without them I can promise you there would be 7,000 or more and not just 700 dead Al Queda collaborators. You should be thankful to them for keeping numbers down instead of bitching about how many lives they saved. Yeah really lets talk about the Law. Under what Law Al Queda is operating when killing thousands of innocent people and terrorizing millions around the World? I would love you to point me to that Law. fastreplies
I understand we should be just thankful that how less people you kill, of-course you can always kill even more I didn't know that alqaeda is the standard that you have to follow!
Of course we can and you know that. If “we†really want to go after your Muslim population, "we" can level your lands within 24 hours and fill it with Indian Ocean all the way down to Russia and you know that too. Joe Public around the world doesn’t want to destroy every Mohamed Muslim but only those who are conspiring to kill us and you know that too. All your howling about innocent people being killed is not because you give a fukk about them it just you don’t want Al Queda being killed and will do and say anything if that may help to keep them alive. Well, I have news for you “broâ€, sooner or later they are going to be dead and you know that too. LOL, your statement would be funny if it wasn't so stupid fastreplies
no you can't because that would be politically incorrect in the current scenario if you could, you would have done that a long time ago and it is not about what Joe Public wants, its all about the goals of zionists and neocons and I am yet to see that how are you assuming that there were terrorists at all places where drones bombed? it wasn't me, you yourself wanted to fall to that standard
Politically incorrect? Now you’re contradicting yourself. Starting war in Iraq was politically incorrect but that doesn’t stopped G. Busch from starting one. Political correctness is not an issue in here but compassion for innocent Muslim people taking hostage by terrorists is. Well then "Bro", apparently Zionists and neocons don’t want to destroy Muslim nations according to your statement. Thank God you recognize that. All killed in bombing had red dots left by laser bin on their foreheads. Oh boy, when I thought you couldn’t post any dumber statements than you had posted, you came up with even dumber one. What’s wrong with you man? Don’t you know how to maintain debate format and that you need brains and facts and not your second hand emotions if you want to have your opponents to take you seriously? fastreplies
innocent Muslims? is there any such thing? as you just mentioned all killed by drones had red dots. so after-all whoever you kill no longer remains 'Innocent' yeah, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran, Yeman, Palestine, Sudan ... no they don't want to destroy Muslims and all the sources provided in beginning of this thread contradict that, mind you 700 innocents were killed while chasing some superficial targets and just because someone gets killed by usa drones does not mean that he is a 'terrorist' so why don't you tell us that under what laws US operates when it bombs targets in Pakistan?
New, why do you keep asking the same stupid questions over and over again, when you are never satisfied with the answers? You realize asking the question again won't yeild a different answer right? If you weren't happy with the answer the first time, you probably are not going to be happy the second time either. As stated many previous times. This happens with the expressed permission and cooperation of the Pakistani government. I suppose you could say it is the same law that allows the Pakistanis the right to conduct military operations against the Taliban in the swat valley. If you like, I can print this answer out 20 more times here so you will have it at your finger tips to cut and paste it in on my behalf the next 20 times you ask the same question. Uh, no. Your source was the ONLY source that made that ridiculous claim. Every other source and common sense rejected it. This answer too I would be willing to repeat at least 20 times so you can have it at the ready. Conversely, it only stands to reason that just because someone gets killed by a drone does not mean he is NOT a terrorist, and yet that is what you are selling. Full of contradiction, aren't you.
permission ? http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/asiapcf/01/28/davos.pakistan.pm/ they are crying every other day that US should stop the attacks not me David Kilcullen and he told that to House Armed Services Committee yeah, just like whoever the isreali terrorist forces kill is a terrorist, whoever you kill also becomes a terrorist ... how convenient... just keep killing, everyone transforms to a terrorist after you kill him what I am telling you is that, just like isreal commits excesses against civilians, SO is USA doing the same ... after-all you have lot in 'common'
From your article: In other words, we would prefer you send us money. What you have is US claiming there is cooperation and permission, and Pakistan claiming their isn't. The reasons for this should be obvious. The truth of the matter can easily be obtained by the fact the US and Pakistan continue to have a good working relationship. Were we to do missile strikes in any nation without permission, it would be an international incident and a cause for war as you well know. That should tell you a lot about the missile strikes going on in Yemen as well. Once again, this has all been explained to you. Feel free to cut and paste from here, or any of the other 20 times this has been explained to you. Already explained to you. Once again asking the same question. So your justification of your position that every person killed by a missile strike is not a terrorist is... "Look at Israel"? Really? Really? Its not even related to trying to justify your position. It isn't even a logical argument. I was under the impression you had to be at least 18 to post in P&R.
What are you having some freaking blindness disease? Why don't you shut your mouth for a second and open your eyes so you can read what people are saying in their posts instead of asking stupid questions again and again. 1 Billion of them, that you and your friends terrorists would rather to sacrifice so you can blame others for your own stupidity. fastreplies
the truth of the matter is that US is the world goon, Pakistan can't afford a war with it, so it has to live with it However, the leader do openly condemn and ask US to stop the attacks on Pakistani territory But of-course. the goon won't listen, he can attack any place of its liking since HE is the GOON and does not have to follow any law. yes, I agree saying that 'common sense' does not agree with it is a nice explanation this justification was provided by your buddy fast replies you kill and they become terrorist innocent as long as you don't decide to kill them. after that they would transform to ugly terrorists, this is as per the logic provided by you
The world police would be more accurate. I can see the opposition, if you are a criminal or support them(New). Once again you have demonstrated dissatisfaction with the answers, no matter how obvious they may be. It is a symptom of a flawed value system.
the police follows the law, while the Goon forces it way through (Like US is doing in Pakistan) or do you think that US is a law unto itself ? check the link http://pakalert.wordpress.com/2010/01/09/the-worlds-worst-terrorists-based-in-washington/
When you were in school, how many times did your teacher have to explain addition to you?(I'm assuming they taught addition in your school). I'm not going to waste my time restating the obvious truth of the relationship between the US and Pakistan in the war against Al Queda, Taliban, and radical Islam. The fact you post opinion links as if they have any merit whatsoever does not speak well for you. Next you will be quoting yourself as an authority.