Thanks for the entry simplyg123: Like the idea but I don't like that font. Also I want the DNL to clearly be uppercase and the rest lowercase
Thanks for all the entries everyone. tickey: I don't really like the big N thing above it, I don't really see what that has to do with the name. sarsh11: I don't want a tagline such as you have "Domains for Sale". I just want the name of the site. Also, I feel like the mouse icons and the squares is a little to much of a "corporate" look for this logo if that makes sense. simplyg123: I like this one better (there's an extra L in there though). I'm not crazy about the font though, I would prefer a thicker font. watari: I like this logo, except I don't really like the box that keeps repeating DNListings over and over
simplyg123: The font is better on this one. Still seems a little too plain though... tickey: This one a little better than the first but I'm still not sure what that graphic has to do with the site. I like the version with it on the left though more than above. Thanks for all the entries so far everyone. Looking forward to some more
As your website will list domains and also it will have a search facility for users to find the right domain(s), I decided to draw two hands like shape (although not the actual hands) which symbolize bringing/giving/your website found 'something' for them and the big circle in between symbolizing that 'something' or the desired domain. Sorry for my English, but I think I described the thinking behind the design. Thanks again for your kind feedback.
watari: I like this version better, but I still don't like the DNL part. I get what you were trying to do in the original one by showing a "list" of things, which I like, but I don't want any other text besides the name of the site. Perhaps some other graphic that implies a list but does not contain actual text would be better. tsoft: I like this entry, I'm not sure about the effect on the font although I guess that is "web 2.0" and it would be very plain with out it. simplyg123: This version is a little bit better but still not really doing it for me.