Karinna - Thanks for the new versions. I really do like them but I think I'm after a more web 2.0 look maybe? I think you should be able to get the feel of what I want by the examples mentioned at first and the 2 I have expressed the most favorable reviews for so far. pat3ck - Thanks for your submission as well but I think the logo needs a bit more polish? Too basic maybe?
ZakCooper - Nice work. I'm not too sure what else to say. I will have to think about your entries. This is getting a bit harder now. tsoft - both your entries are awesome. I think I'd like to see the url in there. (don't forget the dash please). Joshyn - lol Thanks for the comic relief. Pixel Dynamics - excellent work - as previously mentioned I'm having a bit harder time with my feedback now as it is coming down to preference on many of these (competition is heating up). The easiest critique is the lack of color and I'm not too sure about the height of the design. I will have to think further about your design. bdp_designer - I like the idea. It needs a bit more work though. More color maybe. Play with a few different versions of it maybe?
Heres an updated entry: All colors and text can be changed easily. Any further comments would be great. Thanks! - Nick
Hi Ive gone for the approach of compact font like you said and kept with black and white for clear understanding of the text. If its color you want just ask. Feed back mostly appreciated.
Hi Ive gone for a more compact logo as you requested. Kept with a black and white font for clear and easy readable. If you want color let us no and I will see what I can do.