5 Reasons why Barack Obama will mash up the US

Hey bro. In America we pick leaders based upon what they can do for our country. That is why we have such a heated election. There was no way that a Republican should have a shot at the White House. Not after the stunts of President Bush (which I admire some of them).

But yet American's are the most interested in the elections than they have ever been. And its not because of Obama. Its because United States is in financial crisis and if we go down you can kiss your London goodbye.

The biggest concern of American's (and the world at this point) is the economy. If America goes into a depression the whole world will follow. Obama's plans for America including charing the tax payers 700 billion to bail out the banks and loan companies will ruin our economy.

Don't get me wrong, McCain is not my guy either. In fact I have said plenty of times I would not vote for him, but if I did vote for any it would be because of Sarah Palin. Obama is a socialist at heart and that will mash up the country.

I still stand by my word. The day America falls is the beginning of the end of this world. No other country (not even China) has the ability to command the respect and wield the power that US has. Of course she will fall eventually, but so will the rest of this modern world.

 

Obama has made it clear to Russia, Afghanistan and Pakistan its not going to be business as usual.

 

Why might I ask?

 

Most Americans realize where Obama stand and his socialist views and are basing their votes on race and where he graduated from.


I am glad you would not waste your vote.

 

Eight years of bush proves your point... oh wait, no it doesn't.

 

Bush has done quite well. He handled Iraq, Afghanistan and will not take crap from Russia.

 

It's almost touching.

 

Yes instead of doing nothing after 9/11 he was proactive.

 

Proactive by dropping the ball and going after a country that had nothing to do with 9/11. Yep that was a great strategy.

 

Playing the same tune on the violin are we? Come on Grim, terrorist ally had to be stopped.

 

Well, mankind is quite resilient. America will not fall or vanish or anything, but it is quite possible that her power may wane and another country might eventually replace America on the top. Power shifts and transfers, it rarely stays at one place forever. Power is sustained by effort, creativity, planning, foresight and many such things. No country should become complacent and slothful, taking it's power for granted.

 

Saddam was not an ally of the terrorist's we are fighting Homebiz. If anything he was their enemy.

 

I will agree to that to some degree but I will not put a halo on Sadame.

 

Now people who like Iran, raise their hands up.

Iraq-Iran war

 

It is a fact, nothing to 'agree' with or 'disagree' with.

No Saddam does not wear a halo, nor do many other dictators of which we could of attacked, that would of had nothing to do with our war on terrorism.

 

That is coming from a guy who does not know what language the Afghans speak. And he wants to (or wanted to..whichever one) Pakistan to look for Bin Laden.

Does that sound like a guy who can handle foreign policies.

I would love to go into a debate with you as to why I would vote for her, but I'll let you find out when she takes office in a few months.

On of the reasons happen to be that she is more qualified on demestic and foreign issues than Obama.

I think I'll vote for Mickey Mouse. He runs in every presidential election you know

Bush was a and still is a great foreign leader. If it were not for him Saddam would have nuclear weapons. The Taliban would still be in power. North Korea would still be threatening your tiny country.

Oh and Russia would have probably incaded the who country of Georgia by now.

And in case you are blaming him for the crisis that the economy is in, let me assure you that that crap belongs to the beloved democrats in Congress.

 

Not a fact young misguided one.

A lot of ignorant people are throwing their vote away by writing in candidates.

 

So in other words you know absolutely nothing on the subject other than what the right parrots? She has no qualifications on 'foreign' issues, like a member said on here before 'he can see the moon from his bedroom, that does not make him a fucking astronaut'. Most of what she's built on is a lie. Hell she is so horrible at interviews and the like they might as well keep her in a bomb shelter.

It is a fact that Saddam was not an ally of the terrorists we are fighting, no matter how hard you want it to be the other way around it does not make it so.

Wow nice jab at me since I'm about the only one on here who continues to say I will write in. Again Homebiz if I'm 'ignorant' what does that make you?

Mr who still thinks Saddam and Al Qaeda were allies?

I forgot however selling out ones own principles for 'more of the same', to continue our nation on the path of 2 parties with no option is the smart thing to do. Perhaps if more people got the balls to put their vote into who they actually supported we would get out of this mess, unfortunately too many people think like you.

I see we have another totally biased poster here. Saddam would have nukes, what do you base this on? Taliban would be in power? I doubt after 9/11 any president would of allowed the Taliban to be in power. North Korea, sure he made such progress there.

Russia would have 'incasded the who country of Georgia by now. Extremely doubtful.

The 'Democrats' who barely hold a majority in congress and just recently go it are to blame hey? You base this on what facts exactly? It appears to me that facts are something that eludes you.

 

I phrased wrong. I meant to say I am not interested in going into a debate with you as to why I would vote for her.

Anyways about Saddam's weapons. He did have them. He just moved them to Syria when he sensed Bush was coming. And of course I have proof. Here are some articles you might want to read.

http://www.nysun.com/foreign/saddams-wmd-moved-to-syria-an-israeli-says/24480/
http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/1/26/115712.shtml
http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2005/3/2/230625.shtml
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2004/aug/16/20040816-011235-4438r/

 

Ha, I got a good chuckle out of this post. Let me giev a little response to that:

Oh really? I get a good laugh about how people critisize obama for being inexperienced when McCain appointed a VP who has less experience than Obama, is a total idiot, and thinks that humans and dinosaurs coexisted 4,000 years ago... Plus, when McCain dies SHE'LL be the one that takes over the presidency!!!

1. He made a mistake, he corrected himself RIGHT AFTER. Come on...

2. 'Cause McCain has never ever lied about ANYTHING...

3. Wow... I doubt you could become a US senater if you thought there were 57 states in the US. Also, that was a slip up, he meant to say 47 because he said he had one more to go to besides Hawaii and Alaska.

4. All politicians do that. It's the way it works.

5. *Sigh* Obama wants to LOWER TAXES FOR 95% OF AMERICANS AND RAISE TAXES ON THE OBSCENELY RICH ASSHOLES MCCAIN WANTS TO gIVE LOWER TAKES TO TO KEEP THEM OBSCENELY RICH.