I wonder what they are negotiating about so long. Isn't it obvious? *. China and Russia won't accept any sanction or strike on mullahs and they have one million reasons for this. *. US and just recently Europe find it stupid just begging mullas to stop their atomic development and not showing them some real prospect of punishment. (US has one million and Europe 1 reason for punishing Iran) I don't see why a matter so simple needs so many days negotiation. OK I admit I don't have a doctorate in politics but I don't think I need to be an engineer to realize that the bulb is burnt. .
Just to have broken international agreements can be enough to declare various areas off-limits. The longer it takes to come to a conclusion through the Un-security council the more painful it will be for the local people of the countries in question and that would bother me eventually. Enough evidence came out of the mouth of this bastard, trying to speak now with angel tongues, and some of his fellows. The only way to solve this problem is that this country has to stop its ambitions. They rejected long before the "russian bridge" an offer from Europe richest countries, jammed with econmical packages with all advantages, so no one can say that the leadership in this country is interested in building up the nation and help the poor and needy. That's the truth
Roman Abramowitch has very good relations with Putin and is a jew. So why would he accept the nuclear affair from the beginning?
I wonder if this is ironic or not. No plitician in the world wants mullahs to gain atomic bomb - except Costro perhaps - but every body knows that the most beneficial of a sanction would be US and the most loser would be China. China and Russia would perfer Iran to stop their atomic ambitions peacefully but if they are going to choose they would choose an atomic Iran rather than losing a big market - for Russia - and loosing both a market and a source of oil - for China-. .
the problem is not that once Iran has the bomb, they'll use it, probably not, but once Iran has nuclear weapons, other Muslim countries will want to develop it either, which may still not be that bad (ok, it's pretty bad, but can be worse yet), but eventually it'll be in the hands of terrorists, which is pretty much the worst..
Yes, Syria next, then Saudi Arabia, then Afghanistan an so on.. the only thing that can stop this circus is disturbation or by pushing Israel down to the sea(you know what I mean). Seriously, if we fail to prevent Iran from getting nuclear warheads, we might consider a resettling of every Israeli citizen for security reasons. This will cost probably hundred times more than an invasion of Iran, but it will left 6 million broken hearts.
Thats true, they wouldn't use it but they would do things much worse. If they use their bomb it will justify the free world using the same and clearing the problem but this is what they would do: 1. They would send thousands of millishia to fight agains Isreal, what would the world do, or better can do? they have to start negotiating with mullahs. The least that mullahs would want is that Isreal withdraw to it's border 40 years ago. Imaging the support they would gain among islamic fundamentalists. 2. They would demand a new human right convention, they already have it ready, it is called "Islamic human right convention". Do you want to know some of its topics? This is one of them for example: "Nobody is allowed to prevent a muslim from being a muslim.", they don't have the same for other religions. It means that France and Germany have to withdraw their new law preventing girls from wearing Hijab at schools. 3. They would send teams of terror to everywhere they want to quiet unhappy politicians. Be afraid. This is far worse than communist idealogy. Dont be surprised if I change my tone when they manage to make an atomic bomb, you would have to watch your language as well. What a full they are who are trying to persuade mullahs with more carrots and negotiation. .
I've heard many say that it is their right to have nukes. I therefore assume that there are also politicians with that opinions. Lets not forget that Russia provided Iran with the uran from the beginning. I don't know the reason why, it could be for supporting Iran for long-term economical gains but it could also be for short-term economical gains. Mayby it was for disturbing US, especially since the relations have been very rocky lately. The time is running out. Either it's running out for the mullahs or it's running out for the west. Iran could probably win this time if they get too much time(which they have had too much of), I guess. We have to resettle Israel, make patriot acts all over Europe and build a defence missile system. But Europe will be humaliated in the end. We are stamping on the same place, while rest of the world develops and takes over. Freedom will soon be out of date as a result of this.
Most of them refer to the right of atomic energy and not atomic bomb although we know that a politician must be fool to think that Iran wouldn't try for atomic bomb. By the way, why are they so worried about Iranians right to have atomic energy, why aren't they worried about Iranians right to live in democracy? Some reason that because Israel does have atomic bombs so mullahs have the right to make that as well. I want to ask these people why don't mullahs try Isreal democracy and technology for the start? .
There will be no "end" as such, there will be more disgrace to the human race. Wait to see that Google bows to Mullahs regulations the same as they were forced to bow to China's. Wait to see the free world has to set new laws and new court of justice for muslems. - or simply face a sanction from islamic countries, of course China and Russia would be exempted for a while. - Ok, laugh now but don't say nobody told us. .
The weakness in the wests mentallity is that it can't offer a little to save themselfs. Now we have to do such thing. The more we wait, the more we have to offer. The time is killing us.
This will all continue until the Islamists do something to force Western civilization to grow a backbone. They will threaten us with nuclear blackmail and we will bend and grovel and beg and whimper. One day, they will use a bomb and we will snap and then they will simply disappear.
But everyone will blame Bush for first bombing the west in order to make a parkinglot in Middle East.
Luckily, G.W.B. will be happily retired by then. The Islamists will be starting a war with Hillary Clinton. And they have no idea what hell is in store for them when they mess with that bitch.
Sure, Hillary hates America. But when she's in charge and they attack America, she will see it as a personal attack on her. Bill Congreve was right when he said "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned." Emotionally, Hillary will have to prove that she's more of a man that G.W.B., and the only way for her to do that is to push hard and fast against the enemies of this nation. I would not want to be them.
The UN Security Council can't pass a resolution unless the Super 6 all agree. That's why negotiation takes place.
The only resolution that China and Russia would agree is "keep begging mullas to leave their atomic ambitions". They wouldn't say what if mullas don't. Anybody who claims mullahs will withdraw by mere negotiation is either a liar or a fool - most probably a liar -. There are only 2 ways to tackle mullahs, either by overthrowing them or a massive air strike so that they lose not only their nuclear facilities but their full resources in particular oil industries which will prevent them from further atomic developemnt and feeding terrorists. There is a third option, they must be convinced that USA would choose one of the above if they don't cooporate. Mullahs need atomic bomb and they are going to get it. They don't care about poverty. They know the world would bow before them after they get what they want. .