4 Names to appraise please

Discussion in 'Appraisals' started by Tekntoant, Apr 5, 2006.

  1. #1
    pingroll.com (I was thinking Blog ping site)
    crunkblog.com
    wwwlifehacker.com (typo that gets about 40+ type-ins a month)
    hotxxxreview.com


    so what do you think?
     
    Tekntoant, Apr 5, 2006 IP
  2. mcfox

    mcfox Wind Maker

    Messages:
    7,526
    Likes Received:
    716
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    360
    #2
    To be perfectly honest, I don't believe any of the domains is worth anything. Sorry.
    The only caveat I'd add to that is pingroll.com may be worth holding onto on the off-chance that it becomes a buzzword.
     
    mcfox, Apr 6, 2006 IP
  3. mike_d

    mike_d Peon

    Messages:
    73
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    Hi Tekntoant,

    I'm afraid I have to agree with McFox. Reg fee at best.

    Of course, I'll add the usual caveat that if you develop, you could add value. The hotxxxreview would be an obvious pron reviews site, for instance. Lots of potential users, it's just that no-one admits it...

    Mike.
     
    mike_d, Apr 6, 2006 IP
  4. americanguy

    americanguy Peon

    Messages:
    62
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    hotxxxreview.com sounds good - But content would not be acceptable by most advertisers
     
    americanguy, Apr 6, 2006 IP
  5. thewindmaster

    thewindmaster The Man with the Plan

    Messages:
    845
    Likes Received:
    20
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    hotxxxreview.com Might bring in low to mid $xx to the right buyer but all other reg fee at best
     
    thewindmaster, Apr 6, 2006 IP
  6. EGS

    EGS Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,078
    Likes Received:
    438
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    290
    #6
    HotXXXReview.com is the most valueable one you have. Right now it can be mid to low-high $xx range. Develop it, get ad revenue, and it'll be worth a lot more.
     
    EGS, Apr 9, 2006 IP