200 sites and $1 per day each? Does this really work?

200 sites is little overkill, try with 2 quality sites instead.

 

ih with hostmonster you can host Host UNLIMITED Domains for UNLIMITED Hosting Space UNLIMITED Site Bandwidth

for Domains you can take for free form www.co.cc or 1.99 $ from yahoo

 

If you have 200 websites, you will have 200 websites to do on-site and offsite optimization. Did I mention that this is an ongoing process? You can achieve the same results with 1-5 websites as you could with 200. The only difference is that you'll have less work with the former. Concentrate on quality.

 

I agree, so what really is the risk of setting up lots of sites and not touching them for months? Most people report no change in traffic? So whats the problem?

Would that be a shared IP for all domains? Would that cause in issue, especially if you wanted to link the sites together?

 

Zat is very very easy if you are focussed and are willingz to invest time and money...

take a hint.

200 is a big number.. you can try 50 for starters..

Select one good niche with decent search volume.
Create 50 different sites all related to that niche..

have about 5 sites each on one C Class..

all 49 sites need to have at least 100 pages, unique...

Submit them all in directories.. about 500 directories...
in a staggered manner.

Submit EACH PAGE in social bookmarks.. about 10 social bookmarks for each page...

Don't interlink wildly but do it randomly... link into inner pages...

Wait till some of your sites get page rank..

Go for link exchange with external sites..
Offer to link from Site A and get a link to Site B.. repeat for all 50 sites...


These can be replicated several times ...

You just need to automate certain aspects..
And you should know when to move on...

But it needs a lot of sweat.. But just Sweat..
To create ONE BIG site and making it sucessfull needs a lot more stuff then Sweat...
Something called Luck and Skills

Not everyone has skills
Not every one is lucky

But EVERYONE sure can be haardworking.

This is the hard way but a sure shot way...

Don't ask me for niche.. There are thousands...

Automate the social bookmarking and outsource directory submissions.
Get cheap contents written.. You don't need 10 Dollars pages.. just unique decent pages...

And buy lots and lots of links....
if you want to earn 200 hundred a day, prepare to spend 1 k a month

 

Me I have in 1 host more of 40 and every 1 is independent and no problem
Example

http://video-movie-online.com

http://www.press-reviews-forum.com

http://www.arabian-news.org

Is not linked together and every 1 has independent folder in my host

 

You can

But you need to have a plan and initial capital investment in place

Here is step by step what you can do:
1. Research for niches and sub niches which can create 200 domains for you
2. Register domain names with your primary keywords in it
3. Take a reseller account with a major host, i recommend hostgator
4. Have individual/separate ip's for each domain
5. Get atleast 50-80 articles written on each niche
6. Outsource the designing part or use a CMS
7. Outsource the linking part
8. Keep tweaking the website yourself, i mean, occasional, link building efforts, article submission and article writing, join related forums and participating in discussion and leaving your domain footprints there
9. If you are smart enough to mask your cross linking well then you have 199 links ready for each of your domain, but then that is b]lack/ha[t

Continue the steps 6,7,8 for 6 months relentlessly and i am quite sure you will reach 200/day with adsense, may be not exactly 1$ per site but it may vary depending on niche, but somewhere around that should happen, then hardwork pays

But then initial investment cannot be avoided, since it is a project you are planning and not pursuing a hobby

 

I think it is better to have one good site than having 200 sites.

 

yes you can do that if you can manage all your websites....regularly....

 

Hi,

I saw a post on a similiar idea here that you may be all interested in.

http://www.australianwebmaster.com/showthread.php?p=5309#post5309

 

Here is something to look at.

www.googlesiteclub.com

 

After reading all your comments above concerning the amount of time it would take to create 200+ sites and continually improving them I have to agree.

However the Google Site club seems to overcome this. If each member only looks after his/her site and continually updates it for all other members to take advantage of them really all that is left is the SEO and web site promotion part.

Imagine having 200+ sites each earning $10 a day as they would be all quality web sites wouldn't they.

Anyway the idea seems feasible to me and is up to the individual member how many sites they actually use, but would still give them the option of choosing from other members sites and not having to start from scratch so to speak.

The concept is like open source really I guess, but with web sites aimed at Google Adsense and Google Adwords.

The Google Site Club (www.googlesiteclub.com) has only just launched. Hopefully it will take off, so that we can give it a go.

 

People get addicted to the $x/day idea. It's a horrible goal because real life doesn't run like a computer program.

Make 1 website and see what happens. Keep tweaking until you make a profit. Then repeat.

That's about all there's to it, kiddies.

 

I believe this can be done. You just need a good plan before you start working. For example a domainlist of 200. And while you build the sites, make sure they all link to each other. I build websites too for myself. The first thing I do when I have a domain is making sure it will at least eran the investment back. From then on keep it running. Some people here think you need to update it every day. But that's not necessary at all. You could go through each site every three months. 3 sites updates a day. Just get some good free articles from your niche and rewrite them could get you some good content without much trouble. I am wondering what will happen with your social life though...

 

200 Sites is alot of work. And it usually take time for the SEO's to index you pages. I agree with everyone else. Dedicated your time (and money) to 1 site. Love it, Nurture it, Watch it Grow and see from there! Best of luck!

 

are you planning to use only adsense? if you are open to other methods of making money, then you should make only a handful of websites. Say 10. And work real hard on those and try to make 10-15$ a day with those to start with...
There are tons of alternatives to pay per click and you might want to explore them..

 

In your place I will make just 10-20 sites! Like this you will also have time to live this beautiful life! Not working 24/7! What your wife or girlfriend say about this?

 

Remove 1 zero from your 200.
mate start with some 15-20 websites, and make them quality one, its better to build quality 20 sites and earn $20/day from them,
rather than messing up with 200 sites, which is almost impossible, at least for me.

 

Would be even better if you had 20 sites and only really develop one and maintained the other 19.

http://www.googlesiteclub.com

 

Apparently, Jim Karter (of, believe it or not, www.JimKarter.com) has 200 or so websites that he "personally" manages, although he says that he hires people to write most of the content for them.

He wrote a blog post a while ago in which he claimed to have earned somewhere between $30,000-$40,000 in that month; this would work out to be $4.93-$6.57 per site per day, on average (or thereabouts; I'm sure it's not exactly 200 sites). However, I reckon that most of his sites must make less than that (e.g. the $1 a day mentioned as the thread topic), while most likely just a few sites bring in the big bucks.

Here's an example of one of his basic sites: eChemotherapy.com.

In any case, it looks as though he's built up this "AdSense empire" over quite a long period of time, and as I said he employs several people, so it's certainly not an easy get-rich-quick concept.

Anyway, like a lot of the posters on here, I'm against the dilution of the value of the Web, and hence I'd also err on the side of having a few, high-quality sites rather than a ton of lame ones.

PS. at the time of writing, both his main site and the example site I gave seem to be down...