100% Width vs. Fixed Pixel Width?

Discussion in 'HTML & Website Design' started by LiftBigEatBig, Oct 27, 2009.

  1. #1
    Hey guys,

    I'm just working on a new article directory and am having a hard time deciding which style to go with. 100% width like ezinearticles.com and buzzle.com or fixed pixel width like goarticles.com?

    I've noticed the more authority article directories are 100% width. But why? I also have to take into account Adsense click through rates as well, I wonder which style they are higher on?

    Any insight is greatly appreciated. Thanks!
     
    LiftBigEatBig, Oct 27, 2009 IP
  2. stuart.letterman

    stuart.letterman Guest

    Messages:
    143
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    Go with fixed pixel width, some people have massively wide montiors (1920 pixels) and would see the sentences on your site as drawn out and un-structured. Cater for everyone with your site even the 800px wide monitors, perhaps stick the main content in the 770px limit and the adverts right of that.

    good luck,
     
    stuart.letterman, Oct 27, 2009 IP
  3. Kayarc

    Kayarc Peon

    Messages:
    47
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    agreed. Fixed pixel width is really the only way to go unless you are getting creative with your design. There are too many people with smaller resolution monitors out there which you need to think about.
     
    Kayarc, Oct 28, 2009 IP
  4. Om ji Kesharwani

    Om ji Kesharwani Peon

    Messages:
    211
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    in my opinion use px
     
    Om ji Kesharwani, Oct 28, 2009 IP
  5. adwebtiser

    adwebtiser Peon

    Messages:
    95
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    well it depends on how you have coded the content of the site and what the content is, if it is article site then the chances are that its mostly text so the page will still look good on a 1920pixel width monitor cause text just wraps itself nicely on other hand if the website uses alot of images and has columns then I would recommend the fixed pixel but again for that you can use a script that will calculate user's screen size & resolution and based on that populates the right amount of columns that option is abit tricky

    And in the end it is up to you and what kind of look you wanna go for, if you are thinking about the fact that space sells and want to make the most of your space then best to go with 100% option but if you want a site that looks simple and not too busy then go for fixed pixel.

    Hope this has been helpful to you =)
     
    adwebtiser, Oct 28, 2009 IP
  6. eamong

    eamong Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    108
    #6
    as mentioned above use px, and so every user will get same experience with your site.
    or add a js option to switch if its that difficult to decide
     
    eamong, Oct 28, 2009 IP
  7. CannonLogin

    CannonLogin Peon

    Messages:
    311
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    Personally I have never done a layout in % simply because you never know how big the monitor is. I've got one pc pluged into a 32inch tv, and some percent based websites are really disappointing looking.
     
    CannonLogin, Oct 28, 2009 IP
  8. Huskie

    Huskie Peon

    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #8
    This thread is pretty useful, I've never been too sure which method is favourable.

    What is a decent fixed width to use given majority screen resolutions of 1024x768? Roughly 1000 wide and auto height?
     
    Huskie, Nov 3, 2009 IP
  9. LiftBigEatBig

    LiftBigEatBig Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    302
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    123
    #9
    Thanks for all the tips guys. What I eventually decided to go with was a combination of both. I set a 100% fluid width but did a max width of 1260px and a minimum width of 980px. This way it fills the screen on lower resolutions, and only goes to a maximum of 1260px wide on higher resolutions.

    Let me know what you guys think!

    www.boostarticles.com
    Code (markup):
     
    LiftBigEatBig, Nov 5, 2009 IP
  10. Chocolate Lime

    Chocolate Lime Active Member

    Messages:
    399
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    58
    #10
    I think Fixed Width is best for todays resolutions. 100% on some monitors is just too spread. 960-1100px works well and can provide a nice border from the main content for those on resolutions 1024 and above.
     
    Chocolate Lime, Nov 5, 2009 IP
  11. Pwnography

    Pwnography Member

    Messages:
    58
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    43
    #11
    When I code clients websites I use a base element of 800-900px.

    Then I make sure its expandable, and include a Javascript handler that allows people to stretch it by 50-100px.

    Clicking the arrow makes it smaller or larger, everyone uses different resolutions, and sometimes even zoom in on text which makes the site annoying and large.

    That or you can do Resolution checks and do if 800x(variable) then show Layout1, if 1024x(variable) show Layout2 etc etc
     
    Pwnography, Nov 5, 2009 IP